- Posts: 8163
Misogynism
RyuJin wrote: let's make a law forcing them to hire unqualified people to meet a quota based on gender or skin color...basically fighting discrimination with reversed discrimination....that's not true equality nor implied equality...
Affirmative Action is not meant as a quota system to force equality, that would be blunt and ineffective. It is meant as a tool to break the proverbial glass ceiling by achieving penetration in an otherwise closed environment to allow cultural habits to change enough to passively resolve discriminatory practices through exposure to working with those minorities. It would fail if kept too long, or if those minority workers were not qualified or effective. AA is meant as a chance for those minorities to show there stuff in an otherwise unreachable environment due to discriminatory culture. Those people who worked in difficult discriminatory workplaces for their minorities suffered a TON of discrimination which was most often oblivious to those perpetuating it, and because things like gender discrimination were so pervasive it required its own 'ism'. Remembering it was not that long ago that women were not even allowed to vote.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Have you ever worn woman clothing? if not then how can you say that their clothes are constructed worse. it is the persons choice in what they wear. i have been wearing the same clothes for 5 years now and not a problem from it.Abhaya Budhil wrote: Men's clothing is definitely constructed better. It is sturdier and more functional.
You can say it's a woman's choice to use makeup, but that isn't completely true. Some women can choose not to wear makeup and still be successful, but most are pushed to wear makeup even when they don't want to, are expected to put on makeup for jobs and job interviews, are required to completely shave their legs and armpits or face ridicule, often have to paint their nails to be socially acceptable, are pushed to learn to accessorize with jewelry, etc.
As far as hobbies and interests, what someone actually likes depends on the person. What they have to act like they like is determined by social rules. Men are expected to like sports, cars, drinking, tools, etc. Women are expected to like dresses, flowers, arts and crafts, cooking, etc. Women can usually do "male things" without too much ridicule, even if it isn't encouraged. Men usually face ridicule and even violence for doing "female things." This is because masculinity is desirable and femininity isn't.
Women are exposed to more sexism right from the start. Women are less likely to get hired in the first place, or even called in for job interviews. They are also harassed for what they are wearing. Either it is deemed to be too revealing, and they are opening themselves up for criticism, or it is deemed to be too prudish, and they should feel lucky someone is paying attention to them. They are also pushed not to report harassment. When men don't report harassment because they have to be "manly" what would you call that? A product of a society that believes men have to be strong? That is exactly what I have already said, and it is what feminism fights against (as I have also said).
We are not forced to wear make up except for that the past generations have made it seem like we do. I for one do not wear makeup because i find no reason to and it actually ruins your skin. WE also wear makeup to make ourselves look better but don't guys do the same? Guys wear better clothing, comb their hair or do whatever. yeah woman have more stuff to do because we can do more stuff.
For hobbies. IT id not based off of social rules at all and if you believe so then that is because you have been around people that do not want to be different. Men are not expected to like any of that stuff you said. it may be assumed but it is not expected and the same goes for women.
Just a lot of what you say is not true at all.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I was teased all the time in high school because I wore my hair pulled back every day, never wore makeup, and wore jeans and t-shirts instead of more feminine clothing. Now people don't assume that I don't know how to dress just because I wear jeans and sweatshirts to school. I put a bit of water on my hair and comb it in the morning, but I'm not expected to style it. Before, people always told me I should get it cut nice or straighten it or curl it or do anything except keep it out of my face. I'm also no longer expected to put makeup on my face if I'm breaking out.
I'm not big on sports, cars, or physical work. Everyone expects that I should go to the gym, but I just don't like the gym. I like painting, crafting, making friendship bracelets, reading, writing, crying over TV shows. These are all used against me as reasons I'm not "male enough." I have no male friends, no matter how many guys I try to talk to, no matter how much I want to just do whatever others are doing because I don't mind doing the "masculine things" that the guys grew up learning to do. They just don't come naturally to me. But I'm just not seen as one of the guys. I'm "too feminine." Because society does put these expectations on men, and they do suffer for it. And feminism fights that.
What I say is true, both statistically and in my own experience of seeing the drastic change in how I am treated and what is expected of me now compared to how I was treated and what was expected of me as a female. And that's why I stand behind my feminism so strongly. I see how the world really is, I see where that comes from, and I see that feminism is fighting against it.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- steamboat28
-
- Offline
- Banned
-
- Si vis pacem, para bellum.
Abhaya Budhil wrote: Men's clothing tends to be constructed better and more functional for the same price. Men aren't expected to use as many grooming products and there is more of a range of acceptable grooming practices for professional wear... Women tend to face sexism and sexual harassment more. They are also often blamed when they are sexually assaulted and are taught ways not to be assaulted, but we spend very little time focusing on teaching anyone about what counts as consent.
And this is the part where I'm walking away from this thread, because literally everything you said is incorrect in numerous ways, and it is making me very, very frustrated.
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
ren wrote: Abhaya you are completely out of touch with reality.
I wouldn't say that so much as he is chasing rainbows at this point. Clutching at straws and not touching solid ground. For the sake of common ground, it's safe to say that we all want acceptance for who we are and not what society thinks we should be. Am I wrong?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Alexandre Orion
-
- Offline
- Master
-
- Council Member
-
- Senior Ordained Clergy Person
-
- om mani padme hum
- Posts: 7095
Luthien wrote:
ren wrote: Abhaya you are completely out of touch with reality.
I wouldn't say that so much as he is chasing rainbows at this point. Clutching at straws and not touching solid ground. For the sake of common ground, it's safe to say that we all want acceptance for who we are and not what society thinks we should be. Am I wrong?
We're all 'out-of-touch' with reality to some extent, ren ... Reality is sort of slippery for a species such as ours that has memories to deform and aspirations to a 'better' future.
And you're most certainly not wrong, Luthien. We don't accept ourselves the way we are already, which is what leads us to try filling in that hole with the acceptance of others ; living in the difference between what "is" and what "should be" is a pretty hostile terrain.
Please Log in to join the conversation.