- Posts: 913
The Topic of Censorship and Banning
Previous discussion:
It's difficult to generalise about such subjects in such a small community, as even if we talk about it in incredibly vague hypotheticals, its still pretty clear who and what we're talking about
Zenchi's Avatar Zenchi - 1 minute ago
Let's not drive the cart over the cliff while we're at it Ros, nobody's bad mouthing anyone here
Zenchi's Avatar Zenchi - 2 minutes ago
It's a part of how people communicate clearly
Zenchi's Avatar Zenchi - 2 minutes ago
Well that is just silly,
Rosalyn J's Avatar Rosalyn J - 2 minutes ago
Discussing anyone in public is pretty poor taste
Rosalyn J's Avatar Rosalyn J - 4 minutes ago
Lets not name names here. I'm happy to discuss what makes an attack personal or any other hypothetical, but I would prefer no names
Zenchi's Avatar Zenchi - 4 minutes ago
But that's no reason to shut the chat going on down Athena, try seeing it from both sides
Manu's Avatar Manu - 4 minutes ago
Top o'the morning Temple!
Nakis's Avatar Nakis - 4 minutes ago
Ros, could I get a clarification? That discussing other people line: Does it mean that you shouldn't discuss someone's case without them present?
Athena_Undomiel's Avatar Athena_Undomiel - 5 minutes ago
Agreed
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Athena_Undomiel - 6 minutes ago
Agreed
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 6 minutes ago
And we can have a civilized discussion, it just means we need to rise above our emotions and not make arguments personal, which obi and Kyrin have both done.
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Athena_Undomiel - 6 minutes ago
Concerned is fine, but OB1s behavior has been on the radar for a couple years now....
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 8 minutes ago
Bricks just concerned Athena
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 8 minutes ago
Let's not rub salt in people's eyes
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 8 minutes ago
I'm sure I'll contact one of you at some point Rosa. That doesn't mean that we can have a civilised discussion amongst the membership though
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 8 minutes ago
Easy peasy lemon squeezy,
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Athena_Undomiel - 9 minutes ago
See...talk to the Council
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Rosalyn J - 9 minutes ago
The proper way to appeal anything is to go to Council. There are 12 of us. I am one.
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Arisaig - 9 minutes ago
You can do so in pm with a councillor.
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Athena_Undomiel - 10 minutes ago
Complain all you want. The council has made their decision...
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 11 minutes ago
All that rule does is prevent people from complaining when someone gets banned. Thats a genuinely terrifying concept
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 12 minutes ago
If it furthers the topic of debate or is relevant to the topic. Then how can we talk about someone else?
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 12 minutes ago
First time I've agreed with the council in like, years lol
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Arisaig - 12 minutes ago
That'll be on you then. Godspeed in that case. ;p
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 13 minutes ago
Can't complain if you don't try....
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 13 minutes ago
and I won't be conforming to that rule
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 13 minutes ago
Well that is ridiculous Ari
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 14 minutes ago
No, because if it gets locked too I'll flip my lid just like OB1 did. So I'm being censored right now by fear of banning

COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Arisaig - 14 minutes ago
New rule is to not discuss people that are not there...
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 14 minutes ago
I don't think they'll ban you Brick for doing so lol
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 15 minutes ago
And I'm not interested in the new rules Ari, as I've never been found guilty of breaking any rules previously. Though if I am in breach of them, please let me know
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 15 minutes ago
So start another?
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 15 minutes ago
The conversation DID start in the Forum. but the thread was locked. That's literally the basis of my entire argument lol
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 16 minutes ago
No Ari. Hence Why I'm asking for some kind of information on it. As i can't find anything in the threads
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 16 minutes ago
Start the discussion in the forums where it belongs?
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Arisaig - 17 minutes ago
I would also point towards the updated Behaviour Unbecoming thread. May want to get acquainted with the new rules...
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Arisaig - 18 minutes ago
Where you there to witness's the banning event, brick?
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 18 minutes ago
For every person I can name here that supports the banning, I can a person here that thinks it ridiculous. So It's a conversation worth having
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 20 minutes ago
Exactly Zenchi. Which is why the Kyrin thread shouldn't have been locked, because people were still discussing it in the forum
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 20 minutes ago
That's what polls and forums are for Brick

COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 21 minutes ago
given that most of these debates only involve the same 5 people, its pretty difficult to tell who else thinks what. We can only speak for ourselves
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 23 minutes ago
Indeed

COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 23 minutes ago
Anyway this has been nice, real life is calling lol
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Nakis - 23 minutes ago
I'm not arguing on the OB1 issue, I wasn't there. Arguing from an organizational stance.
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 23 minutes ago
You don't, but I'd wager quite a few actually disagree with you brick
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 23 minutes ago
how many warnings was he given?
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 24 minutes ago
I still don't think his behaviour was THAT bad
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 24 minutes ago
He didn't get banned for no reason
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 24 minutes ago
What behaviour Zenchi ? In the forum ?
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 25 minutes ago
That doesn't excuse his behavior brick
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 26 minutes ago
It certainly can
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 26 minutes ago
OB1 wasn't being extremely rude or disruptive. And if he was, he didn't start until his thread was locked - which censored the discussion
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 26 minutes ago
When opnions are seen as rude the line gets very thin
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Nakis - 27 minutes ago
Censoring is to remove someone for their opinions. It does not mean removing someone who's being extremely rude or disruptive.
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 27 minutes ago
yup
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 28 minutes ago
That is exactly what censoring means Nakis loll
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 28 minutes ago
Their not banning everyone, that's a stretch
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 28 minutes ago
What did OB1 do that was so bad?
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Nakis - 28 minutes ago
It's not a matter of censoring, it's a matter of telling people their behavior does not contribute to the positive developmental atmosphere and removing them if they don't modify it
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 28 minutes ago
Not if they ban everyone Brick , nice and peaceful indeed
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 29 minutes ago
It just festers until its explodes
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 30 minutes ago
true, but there are also a few people noticing it that are arguing against it lol. The problem is that censoring people may quiet the place down, but it doesn't solve the issue.
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 31 minutes ago
Low ram lol keyboards done
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 32 minutes ago
Merely the concept of banning
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 32 minutes ago
arguing agagainst it
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 32 minutes ago
Oh yes, but recently it's grown a little more peaceful here, and quite a few people are noticing it and not aeg
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 32 minutes ago
And just to be clear, u am not attacking anyone either
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 33 minutes ago
The atmosphere has been under pressure a lot longer than a few months
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 33 minutes ago
To clarify, I'm not having a go at you Zenchi

COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 35 minutes ago
I'm under scrutiny as well
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 35 minutes ago
the last few months? So you're saying that 2 months before we banned anyone, things were already quiet?
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 35 minutes ago
The arbitrairy use of the ban hammer eats away at the credibility of this Temple
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 35 minutes ago
Not everyone is going to agree, understandable
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 36 minutes ago
We know absolutely nothing about their lives offline Zenchi. Let's not assume things about them, lest people assume things about us
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 36 minutes ago
The atmosphere here lately in the last few months, for starters. Quite a few people have noticed it...
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 37 minutes ago
Give one example where banning gave the wished result, namely bring peace to this Temple
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 37 minutes ago
Are they committed, or merely logged on picking at posts because they do not have strong life's offline?
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 38 minutes ago
And that is not working
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 39 minutes ago
Really?
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 39 minutes ago
All we seem to be doing at the moment is kicking out people who are, and have been, established and committed members of the Temple for years
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 40 minutes ago
I am not in the habit of casting blame, i question the effectivity of banning people
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Brick - 40 minutes ago
Where was OB1 breaking the rules? If it was in the shoutbox, fairplay as I haven't checked. But I can't find anything in the threads
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Nakis - 43 minutes ago
If they were willing to change their behavior, they wouldn't have been suspension. If they refuse to change their behavior after a suspension, who's fault is that?

COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Serenity - 3 hours ago
So Obi is banned again, because banning works so well ...
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Zenchi - 10 hours ago
Glad to see people putting there foot down finally! And yes, I know fully I am not exempt...
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Luthien - 10 hours ago
Oh. Damn. Okay. He was warned so that's his own doing.
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Nakis - 11 hours ago
As per MadHatter: After being asked to stop and after consulting with our security offiers, Ob1 is banned for continuing to attack people in a thread once reminded of the rules.
COM_KUNENA_LIB_AVATAR_TITLE Luthien - 11 hours ago
Whoa. What happened to OB?
please can I remind everyone of the terms of use laid out in Behaviour Unbecoming, link at the top of the page.
And, in line with that, can we avoid the use on names, unless absolutely necessary to the topic of discussion.
- Knight Senan'The only contest any of us should be engaged in is with ourselves, to be better than yesterday'
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Athena_Undomiel wrote: Zenchi is right, my concern is the council-bashing and assumed "censorship by fear of banning" on the about box. I agree the conversation should be moved to the forum
Also, for the record, I wasn't bashing the council. I was voicing my concern at current council policy. I have no problem with the council as individuals or as a group.
- Knight Senan'The only contest any of us should be engaged in is with ourselves, to be better than yesterday'
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Carlos.Martinez3
-
- Offline
- Master
-
- Council Member
-
- Senior Ordained Clergy Person
-
- Posts: 7985
Pastor of Temple of the Jedi Order
pastor@templeofthejediorder.org
Build, not tear down.
Nosce te ipsum / Cerca trova
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Carlos.Martinez3 wrote: Due to privacy issues and such - you are not gunna be able to know about every ban and every reason why...
Thats fair enough. But given that most of the bannings happen due to things that occur in the public forum, its seems daft that they those public occurances should then be 'soft deleted'.
For example, OB1's current ban. I'm only kicking up a fuss because I can't see why he was banned, despite everything he did being in the public forum. If I could see it, I might think 'yeah, fair enough, he was being a dick'. But I can't. So now I have no clue why he was banned. Which makes things look really fishy
- Knight Senan'The only contest any of us should be engaged in is with ourselves, to be better than yesterday'
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Carlos.Martinez3
-
- Offline
- Master
-
- Council Member
-
- Senior Ordained Clergy Person
-
- Posts: 7985
Pastor of Temple of the Jedi Order
pastor@templeofthejediorder.org
Build, not tear down.
Nosce te ipsum / Cerca trova
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Carlos.Martinez3 wrote: Feel free to ask for a list or something like that - ask - that’s what you CAN do
That's what I AM doing :laugh:

- Knight Senan'The only contest any of us should be engaged in is with ourselves, to be better than yesterday'
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Rosalyn J wrote: I'd be interested to see what you guys come up with. If you all can come up with a solid proposal, just send the fruit to me or any Council member in a PM. We will read the proposal and voice our consents. 7 consents are needed to pass any proposal
How about a locked thread that only council can comment on with the inciting event, warnings, and final event posted in spoilers? That way its still up for people to go check on, but it can be removed from the threads so to get the thread back on track? Anything further from that really should just be done by private request in PMs.
EDIT: Screenshots of the event, not just a written report.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Carlos.Martinez3
-
- Offline
- Master
-
- Council Member
-
- Senior Ordained Clergy Person
-
- Posts: 7985
Brick wrote:
Carlos.Martinez3 wrote: Due to privacy issues and such - you are not gunna be able to know about every ban and every reason why...
Thats fair enough. But given that most of the bannings happen due to things that occur in the public forum, its seems daft that they those public occurances should then be 'soft deleted'.
For example, OB1's current ban. I'm only kicking up a fuss because I can't see why he was banned, despite everything he did being in the public forum. If I could see it, I might think 'yeah, fair enough, he was being a dick'. But I can't. So now I have no clue why he was banned. Which makes things look really fishy
Suggestion :
Directly contact officers or mods or council member - ask- directly for a direct answer. No amount of information is hidden here. It won’t be public. You may have to kindly ask privately .
Pastor of Temple of the Jedi Order
pastor@templeofthejediorder.org
Build, not tear down.
Nosce te ipsum / Cerca trova
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Carlos.Martinez3 wrote: Due to privacy issues and such - you are not gunna be able to know about every ban and every reason why...
OK, I have one suggestion on this topic. A thread was locked because certain pronouns were used towards a certain member, never was it made public which pronouns should be used or would have been preferred. This, cannot continue...
If threads like that are going to be locked for such reasons, that information needs to be made public as to who wants to be called what pronouns, otherwise we're avoiding clarification which could help avoid further confusion....
Please Log in to join the conversation.