- Posts: 8163
Word battle: Temple VS church
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Such reliance on Christian words when there are Jedi words already seems to me an attempt to legitimise what we do here, almost guiltily clinging to stuff we know rather than embracing that which is uniquely Jedi. As you know I'm keen to remove the ultra Christian clerical titles, because a "Jedi Bishop" is just ludicrous. It is pompous in a way which is totally unbecoming of the core values of Jediism, it has connotations which are actively damaging to just how Jedi we can be. As does the word "church".
We are Jedi. We should be proud of that. We have a Temple in which we come together - not a church, because there is no crucifix hanging here. Ironically given the defensive comments made last year, we now seem to be letting the jackasses at Jedi Church influence how we define ourselves here, a place which is the antithesis of what they do. That is a very worrying trend.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Br. John wrote: For US tax purposes we are considered a ministry, not a church or a temple. For US First Amendment issues we are considered a church which includes the terms cathedral, temple, tabernacle and so on.
But 'temple' has the highest visibility and self identification through the title because it is generally more in line with the Jedi theme I guess.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I agree virtually noone here would ever use that word for what we are. Hence the debate this has stirred up.
Even if in the US Constitution we are considered a church... internationally we wouldn't be, so that US-centric definition seems particularly daft directly alongside the word "International".
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Any ideas what to put instead??
Best Jedi Community in the Universe

Please Log in to join the conversation.
A better use for it would be to advertise upcoming sermons, community events etc like the similar line on the old site.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Adder wrote: I don't think we see the term 'church' too much here, and so reckon it is used for legal reasons, rather then historical or for self identification;
Br. John wrote: For US tax purposes we are considered a ministry, not a church or a temple. For US First Amendment issues we are considered a church which includes the terms cathedral, temple, tabernacle and so on.
But 'temple' has the highest visibility and self identification through the title because it is generally more in line with the Jedi theme I guess.
Despite what the US First Amendment says, if we really are international (which is how this whole argument started) we need to consider the implications outside of the USA of the words we use.
It won't let me have a blank signature ...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
tzb wrote: How about "International Temple of Jediism" or "International Jedi Community" if we need to have that line at all? We never have before now...
A better use for it would be to advertise upcoming sermons, community events etc like the similar line on the old site.
Or just "Temple of Jediism."
No church
No International
Just say it as it is. A Temple for people who practice Jediism.
As for the Christian bit. Until this temple gets rid of the other christian terms....Sermon, Pastor, Decon, Clergy..... Church is the least of christian concern.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.

And also your earlier post said ""International Temple of Jediism" I was saying to drop "International"
Please Log in to join the conversation.