Profiles - Gender

ren wrote: I know sex and gender are different. Sex is real, gender is BS. I am well aware of that, hence why I made the change. Your need for "gender" to be there is silly.

And again. You don't get to make that decision for someone else. That's not a right you have. No one has the right to go to another person and tell them part of their identity is "silly". Gender is part of peoples' identities, part of who they are. No one has the right to tell someone else that that's wrong or silly... Not when it's so integral to who a person is and how they relate to the world.

We don't need to know someone's sex on a website. Know their gender is part of knowing their identity and being respectful to them. A point you seem to keep ignoring.

And if you've been paying attention, almost everyone who's spoken on the matter has said gender is more appropriate than sex for what we use it for on site.

But by all means, do whatever it is you want since that's all that matters to you and there's nothing the rest of us can do on the matter and you've admittedly done so anyway.

Gender is real, if not just because its now recognized in the broader society which we participate and live within.

Personally... I think they are psychological energetic circuits, relating quite distinctly with the spinal alignment, neuromuscular activiation, balance and movement - being that the male tends to a crouched manner ready to spring while the feminine is more a balanced coiled upright arrangement, ready to unwind... all crouched tiger and hidden dragon like
:lol:
But that these only got associated to sex because of the anatomical peculiarities of posture and therefore movement - being its trickier for a male to stand balanced with his package downstairs hanging out front and shoulders larger then hips, plus sitting upright is difficult with the package in the way - while female anatomy with the wider hips and smaller shoulders and balance between larger butt out back and breasts out front provide a more balanced upright posture, additionally allowing upright sitting. Creating these two distinct setups, but setups otherwise not limited to sex, beyond that social norm and anatomical disposition. Just my opinion from reading too much Asian spiritual stuff and being too open minded.
:silly:
The rest of gender then is just cultural I guess, but how people define themselves is important to relating to them.

frankly I'm tired of seeing so much debate for something like this. are five discussion pages in less than an hour. why not post on their training this so intensely. and something else, the person who started this topic is really worried about this subject or simply made for lack of anything better to do? so I ask myself and honestly, we have more important things to do

Okay, this got carried away.

I have not read the 4 PAGES of what I am sure is brilliant debate on this -


I don't believe the question was about Gender in a broad sense, so much as "Can we have a Third option on the drop down list that is not M or F" - Seems like more a technical "site set up capability" question than a "How do you feel about non-binary genders" question.

That was done, so I would think the problem was solved?


But, I'm never one to deprive someone of an opportunity to jam their agendas into any given conversation

MrBruno wrote: frankly I'm tired of seeing so much debate for something like this. are five discussion pages in less than an hour. why not post on their training this so intensely.

Because this is an important matter to many in our Temple.

and something else, the person who started this topic is really worried about this subject or simply made for lack of anything better to do?

Knowing the OP as I do, I don't believe that Edan would start this topic to start trouble, but only out of genuine concern.

so I ask myself and honestly, we have more important things to do

No.
We do not have better things to do than care of our members.
Ever.

The initial suggestion of this thread was to consider adding additional gender options, with even "other" being better than just the traditional binary choices. It wasn't to argue sex vs gender, though the necessity of that argument was born out of asinine comments.

Which.... Is essentially what was done but because "gender is BS" it was changed to sex and neither....

Which. Is. Wrong.

Again you don't get to make that choice for other people.

No.
We do not have better things to do than care of our members.
Ever.

Caring for members is one thing. I'm all for it. Support were support is due.

Self indulgent semantic stance-taking, finger pointing, and inane debate is not so much "caring for members" as the pseudo-social awareness version of jacking it.

Especially on an international forum, where getting distressed about nuances in synonyms in one language looks fairly ridiculous.

it was changed to sex

My passport says "Sex/Sexe"

As a word - if it's good enough for passports, it's good enough for here.

JamesSand wrote: Caring for members is one thing. I'm all for it. Support were support is due.

Self indulgent semantic stance-taking, finger pointing, and inane debate is not so much "caring for members" as the pseudo-social awareness version of jacking it.

Especially on an international forum, where getting distressed about nuances in synonyms in one language looks fairly ridiculous.

The difference between "gender" and "sex" is not a "nuance in synonyms." We have plenty of members on this international forum who might be personally affected by these decisions.

How so?

...because it forces them to choose between their identity and a metric that they don't feel identifies them at all?