Basic Art of the Sword and Light saber Combat

http://www.sword-buyers-guide.com/support-files/jsa-ebook.pdf
http://www.sword-buyers-guide.com/sword-fighting-schools.html
https://sites.google.com/site/terraprimelightsaberacademy/
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- steamboat28
-
- Offline
- Banned
-
- Si vis pacem, para bellum.
baru wrote: check out Cold Steel. Look at their plastic training swords. I use them all the time. I highly recommend them.
I'll second this, but they aren't typical plastic. They're some kind of seriously hardcore synthetic. You can scratch it, but breaking it is ridiculously difficult. They have give and bend, which makes them really useful. I have one of their walking canes made out of the same stuff (the blackthorn reproduction), and it is legitimately useful as a weapon if necessary, due to the way it transmits force.
As for the OP, I was a fencer in college and have dabbled in many weapon styles, but never settled on learning one very in-depth. I can use any blade presented to me as a tool, but as a coherent system of martial training, I'm lacking.
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in to join the conversation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jian
Please Log in to join the conversation.

Please Log in to join the conversation.
Form III - Spherical Coordinate System (defensive circle). This is the ideal defensive technique for multiple opponents/objectives and open spaces.
Form IV - Polar Coordinate System (offensive projection). Suited to a single opponent/objective and open spaces or when speed of movement is required.
Form V - Cartesian Coordinate System (specialized offensive). This Form can be used defensively or offensively but is best suited to confined spaces or who are otherwise limited in movement, or have added strength in direct strikes. It's weakness is multiple opponents/objectives but this is assumed to be a reduced likelihood in confined spaces.
Form VI - Cylindrical Coordinate System (specialized defensive). It is a reduced version of Soresu, designed for confined spaces. This Form suited dual wielding and multiple opponents/objectives because its tighter movements ensuring greater control and its speed and flow.
Form's I and II for me are training forms with specific approaches that then translate to having some utility in dueling, but do not provide the possibilities of the dedicated Form Styles. These two are close to being set kata, but only because they are limited approaches.
A few years ago I went through Episode III and tried to summarize who was doing what according to that model of Form. It might have a few mistakes, particularly the opening stances. Perhaps try it yourself before comparing it to mine and let me know where I'm wrong!!;
0.09:00 - f3 or f5, offensive
0.12:10 - anakin f3 offense, kenobi f4 offense to outflank
0.12:26 - kenobi f5 offense, anakin f3 offense
0.12:34 - anakin attempts a f3/f6 strike before f5 defense up the stair case
0.12:45 - kenobi f3 offense the droid
0.12:48 - kenobi f5 attack
0.13:06 - anakin aggresive f3 attack
0.19:00 - kenodi f4, anakin f3
0.19:45 - kenobi f5 then f6 kills
Grevious standoff - anakin f2 opening stance, kenobi f3 opening stance
0.55:00 - kenobi f3 opening stance, f3 kill
0.55:45 - kenobi f3 opening stance, f4 attack, f6 then f3
0.56:34 - f3 into f5
1.08:38 - mace f6
1.09:38 - mace f5 attack, moves f6
1.09:42 - mace f3 attack
1.10:00 - mace f5 defence
1.18:28 - jedi f5/f3 defense
1.20:30 - yoda f6 attack
1.22:00 - jedi f3 attack then f5 defence
1.31:50 - vader f4
1.32:14 - vader f6
1.32:21 - vader f3
1.43:34 - kenobi variation f3 stance, vader initaite f3 (or f4,f5 attack!?) before f3 dual
1.44:42 - vader f3 offense and kenobi f5 defense
1.44:52 - vader presses f3 attack then f5 dual
1.46:20 - yoda f2 flourish into f4 stance
1.46:26 - sith f5 stance
1.46:29 - yoda f4 attack, sith f5 defence
1.46:36 - sith f3 attack yoda f5 defence
1.47:08 - f5 dual
1.47:12 - sith f3, yoda's leaping f6
1.47:46 - f3 (or f5?) dual
1.48:04 - vader f4 attack, kenobi fail (should have done Sun djem or Cho mai)
1.48:20 - vader f5 offense, kenobi f3/f5 defense
1.51:38 - anakin f4, kenobi f3
1.54:20 - f3 dual
1.55:20 - f5 dual
1.55:50 - vader leap into kenobi f3 defense blade, or was it an f5 strike obi wan?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Breeze el Tierno
-
- Offline
- User
-
- Posts: 3208
If you are interested in studying the sword, I also reccomend Kali. Filipino martial arts schools can be tough to find, but it is worth the sweat and bruises.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Adder wrote: A few years ago I went through Episode III and tried to summarize who was doing what according to that model of Form. It might have a few mistakes, particularly the opening stances. Perhaps try it yourself before comparing it to mine and let me know where I'm wrong!!;
I must be dense, I hadn't thought of the lightsabre in metaphorical terms... Makes sense.
I have not closely analyzed these movies, but presume the lightsabre work is theatrically-based sets... (the assumption might yet make an a**.. of me...)?
Theatrical sword-work is typically about attacking the other weapon as opposed to attacking the opponent...
For "realistic" study of swordplay, I find HEMA practitioners are very interesting. People like John Clements have worked quite hard at "reclaiming" the Blade:
The ARMA organization
Reclaiming the Blade
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Cabur Senaar wrote: I studied the jian for several years. It is a lovely and valuable art.
If you are interested in studying the sword, I also reccomend Kali. Filipino martial arts schools can be tough to find, but it is worth the sweat and bruises.
I just touched the surface of the Jian. I learned 1 form but none of the 2 person sets. It is such a nuanced weapon, the scholar's blade...
Kali was always of interest but I haven't so far had the time to indulge...
Please Log in to join the conversation.