Jedi Philosophy

  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
3 years 7 months ago - 3 years 7 months ago #350938 by
Jedi Philosophy was created by
Why is it that if the Jedi believe in justice but they also say that killers and rapists shouldn’t be killed? You guys really need to reassess your philosophy before I consider joining the order. May the force be with you all and God bless America and the Jedi Order.
Last edit: 3 years 7 months ago by . Reason: Needed revision.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 7 months ago - 3 years 7 months ago #350939 by Gisteron
Replied by Gisteron on topic Jedi Philosophy
I'm sure you've had all the time in the world to judge our philosophy based on all of the conversations you've had with us during the past hour or so since your registration, and came to the conclusion that "us guys" need to reconsider things.

That being said, I have some questions, too:
First of all, where did you read that Jedi believe in justice? The doctrine mentions it once, namely as one of the 21 Maxims. The flavour text to that maxim makes no statement about the death penalty one way or the other. The one line in the entire doctrine that says anything about the death penalty is the second of the "Jedi Believe" section, a section that says nothing about justice.
Secondly, what about the death penalty is so obviously just that anyone who believes in justice must automatically be in favour of it also? Who exactly declared that this punishment was appropriate for killing or rape, what was their reasoning, and how is their opinion obligatory to share in everyone else's conception of justice?
Thirdly, even if one were to grant that there is an inconsistency here - something you have yet to demonstrate - where exactly do you gather that a moral framework must be entirely self-consistent? Most people have a general sense of fairness, and many also generally value life or bodily autonomy (two ideals that are themselves in conflict often enough). Obviously in some cases these two can conflict, like when we consider how to treat those among us who do not respect such things. What is not obvious is that this conflict must be resolved in exactly one way and not the other, even in any one individual case. Why, assuming that killing a murderer is the just thing to do, does that justness matter more in that moment than the murderer's life? For that matter, why would their life be more valuable than justice?

I think it is a bit rash to dismiss an entire discussion and to pretend like the answer is clear and yours is clearly the right answer. People much smarter than either of us have been debating questions like this for millennia by now. To expect a simple answer to such a complicated question I think is at best unwarranted, and at worst - exploitable. Neither the Jedi of this Temple, nor more broadly, are perfect, either individually or collectively, not by any means. If what you seek is the "correct" philosophy, you won't be finding it here. If you are looking for a place that broadly agrees with yours, then, too, this is probably not it. The most I can say to encourage you is that we tend here to not take ourselves so much seriously as to dismiss the other. I find that one should never be quite that sure of oneself, that one wouldn't listen in the hopes of learning more. Nobody will expel you for believing in the death penalty, and maybe through a well-constructed argument some will even come to agree with you, or appreciate your position for the thought that went into forming it, if any did. Likewise, you too may learn why some people think the way you do, or a different way, by making an effort to find out.
Welcome to TOTJO.
Last edit: 3 years 7 months ago by Gisteron.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Eleven, rugadd, Brick, Rex

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
3 years 7 months ago #350941 by
Replied by on topic Jedi Philosophy
I believe that rapists and murderers should be killed. Sex offenders especially ruin the lives of their victims. Murderers end lives. I know the statement you found regarding the death penalty, that the organization doesn’t believe in the death penalty but members are not expected to believe in everything the organization does. However, if this is not correct please let me know and I’ll leave.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 7 months ago #350944 by rugadd
Replied by rugadd on topic Jedi Philosophy
I think anytime we consider killing someone "a hard and fast rule" is foolish. Here is an example why: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Stinney. I personally lose respect for the character of people who think the right time to end another life is so easy to decide.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Carlos.Martinez3, Brick

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 7 months ago #350947 by Kohadre
Replied by Kohadre on topic Jedi Philosophy

rugadd wrote: I think anytime we consider killing someone "a hard and fast rule" is foolish. Here is an example why: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Stinney. I personally lose respect for the character of people who think the right time to end another life is so easy to decide.


At the risk of lost respect, I only agree with your option partly.

I agree, that a "hard and fast" decision to execute offenders in the legal system denies both the offender and victim true; lasting justice. I feel that our current legal system is far too emotionally invested in the cases presented to it, and as such that emotional influence does a disservice to all parties involved.

However, where it concerns matters of combat/battle I have to disagree. A split second of hesitation on regards of moral dilemma can result in serious injury or death. In cases such as the above, "shoot first & ask questions later" is a preferred ideology simply out of an imperative to continue living.
The following user(s) said Thank You: rugadd, Carlos.Martinez3, Brick

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 7 months ago - 3 years 7 months ago #350949 by rugadd
Replied by rugadd on topic Jedi Philosophy
I don't differentiate between my own need to continue living and others, so perhaps I am the wrong one too make that point too. Then again, I have zero life threatening combat experiences to reference. I like to think there is always an option, but I am also not foolish enough to think people won't kill each other. We do it all the time, for some pretty dumb reasons. But that is not really what we are discussing. I thought we were talking about the death penalty, not killing each other in general.

EDIT: I thought I might add that I recently retired from tournament fighting and have had my fair share of street level scraps. I understand from personal experience the feelings that are involved in combat. I never once felt i needed to kill the other person, even when i was jumped in an alley. It didn't come to it, but the worse thing i was going to do was kick his knee in so i could get away.
Last edit: 3 years 7 months ago by rugadd.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Carlos.Martinez3, Brick

Please Log in to join the conversation.