Sith Realist Resources

Ambert The Traveller wrote: You might not be aware that the craving for 'what is worth suffering for', is the cause of your suffering.
You seem to accept this, because it seems to allow you to achieve the goal of the craving.
You might not be aware that achieving the goal of the craving will not release you from suffering.
But by promoting the craving to achieve success at all cost, you will likely increase the suffering.
As the success is impermanent, it will only lead to more craving and more suffering.
This path will most certainly not lead you to freedom from suffering, but to it's increase.

This is where the Buddha and I part ways. Buddhism stipulates that we can achieve cessation of suffering. I claim that this is only true for those things that do not truly matter to us. Even after deconstructing all the attachments we build by virtue of our upbringing, experiences, and mismanaged thoughts and emotions, there remains a small but ever-present spark, tucked away in the darkest corners of our being, unquenchable.

You are correct in stating that suffering will increase, but life is short, and suffering for what you truly value is actually a beautiful thing. At least it feels that way for me. I am passionate about my family, and long work hours, huge sacrifices, little sleep, and giving them all my attention even when I feel I can no longer keep on going, is something I would not trade for a hundred lifetimes of "peace". I invite this kind of suffering.

Is there something in your life worth your suffering?

Ambert The Traveller wrote: There are plenty of ways to be successful without lighting fires.

I don't understand. Please clarify.

So as I have read through this I have seen some awesome discussion here and I want to ask, why do we as a general group see these as 2 sides of a coin?

Perhaps, if I may, present it as such. Would you consider these 2 philosophical/spiritual codes to be not sides of the coin but the edge? The faces being the conclusions we choose to draw from them?

just some philosophic rambling

Much Love, respect and Peace,
Kobos

Kobos,

Some would argue that they are not related at all. Not even on the same coin. Lol

It's bad form in debate to misrepresent a quote or anything like that to make it falsely support your argument. If the full information or context contradicts your argument, then you should think better of including it.

That could be very true, touche. But isn't it kind of an underlying theme of the ever present force and one's ability to connect to it a major component of both creeds? I would say this at minimum places us in the same cash drawer

Much Love, Respect and Peace,
Kobos

I see them as both distinct and onto themselves. See it how you like. I only ask if it is working for you to do so. Results do not lie.

Wise words Khaos, for the record I love the discussions and cordiality you carry yourself with. I see them as separate but the same in a way just different mind sets. Tends to work for me. There are times I wonder if others notice where each one bleed into another? Both are forms of self cultivation.

For example I work on my physical conditioning in pursuit of martial arts, this makes me more capable to do more sophisticated moves. Does this not apply to both codes in a way?

I am adding physical power to myself and to be honest it has brought me victory in tournaments (that's not my goal of learning though as the practice brings me peace). Like your interpretation you put above as I progress I do have something to build. I would love to be a teacher of martial arts and so I must cultivate that and build it. Now, here's where I think people see a divide is that I see the over all goal of trying to teach it as some what less self serving (but is it really?) than if I was strictly in it for the competitive aspect or for accolades. Funny, thing is I have never really seen that many real/true Sith realist don't really differ in action that much from Jediist (I have yet to see any Sith Realist trying to establish an empire through murder and betrayal as the mythology is presented). That said I personally have my view of the force and yours is just as valid even should the be contradictory. Genuinely, I believe it does make us stronger particularly when we open out mind to it, how we apply it can be said in ideals through creeds but the reality is always different than the ideals; Just my take on it.


Much Love, Respect and Peace
Kobos

I think you can, given you have the care, and the time, bleed any path into another.

As I said, I am primarily concerned about results.

Meaning cannot be overlooked though.

So for me, the Sith path speaks to me. Words have power, and it has its own distinct culture, flavor, and resonance. Some may like to mix and match such things, and some do not. I do not. It would not give my path more value to do so.

Granted, there is also the matter of immersion. I think were one to spend a significant amount of time, and dedication to just one, or the other, you would see more differences than similarities. There is depth to such things. Take each path and spend at least 10 years on it and each one would be much deeper, and singular.

Its hard to see the depth of each without the given practice and time.

I think that is really where threads like this matter. You can see the depth of the practice, the path, if one is willing, of course.

Manu wrote: This is where the Buddha and I part ways. Buddhism stipulates that we can achieve cessation of suffering. I claim that this is only true for those things that do not truly matter to us.

If that would be so, it would mean that it is not possible to enjoy anything that truly matters without suffering.

Wouldn't it be an extremely sad and depressing existence to continue this line of thought?

Even after deconstructing all the attachments we build by virtue of our upbringing, experiences, and mismanaged thoughts and emotions, there remains a small but ever-present spark, tucked away in the darkest corners of our being, unquenchable.

I could not agree more about a spark remaining after the deconstruction of all the attachments. But it appears to me that this spark is lightful and clear, behind an unknowing cloud of matter, black and white, good and bad, sad and happy, suffering or not.
I understand you are saying that the spark appears to you as still being full of suffering that can not be deconstructed further? If you tried to detach from it, wouldn't there be a remaining clear spark, full of potential for both, suffering and not suffering?

You are correct in stating that suffering will increase, but life is short, and suffering for what you truly value is actually a beautiful thing.

I tend to disagree that suffering is generaIIy a beautiful thing, and that it has to come with, or is the basis of everything that one can truly value. This is IMHO a rather depressed world view.

Reducing or getting rid of suffering does not mean to get rid of what you truly value. Unless you value your own and other peoples suffering as a value of its own.

I am passionate about my family, and long work hours, huge sacrifices, little sleep, and giving them all my attention even when I feel I can no longer keep on going, is something I would not trade for a hundred lifetimes of "peace". I invite this kind of suffering.

Are you sure it is not love you are talking about?

Is there something in your life worth your suffering?

Yes. Much of what helps me to reduce suffering. My family, my sleep, the attention I give to my work and my environment, etc. included. They shouldn't have to suffer or die for me to proof their value. Neither should I. The result here should be a quality of love and peace, not so much of suffering.

It is how you look at it I guess. But we do have a choice to put the cessation and reduction of suffering over suffering and it's increase. And it seems to me to be a natural one.

Ambert The Traveller wrote: There are plenty of ways to be successful without lighting fires.
I don't understand. Please clarify.

I was trying to say that there is no need to use force to be (with) the force. Results can be achieved without attachment to passion and suffering.

Now you can reply: But didn't you use force on your keyboard to tell me about this? Aren't you discussing this passionately? True, so I should better smile and let it go

Ambert The Traveller wrote: I could not agree more about a spark remaining after the deconstruction of all the attachments. But it appears to me that this spark is lightful and clear, behind an unknowing cloud of matter, black and white, good and bad, sad and happy, suffering or not.
I understand you are saying that the spark appears to you as still being full of suffering that can not be deconstructed further? If you tried to detach from it, wouldn't there be a remaining clear spark, full of potential for both, suffering and not suffering?

If you have been able to experience this, then awesome. I have not.

Just to clarify, I do not fetishize suffering. I don't take a lit cigarette against my skin and scream "yessssss". All I am saying is that it is the nature of things, that anything you want (and already do not have), will require sacrifice. Sacrifice is painful. But the rewards are worth it. IF those rewards truly reflect what you want. Otherwise the "high" of achieving anything wears off soon.

I consider love and passion synonyms, if we are talking about proper love, that is. I'm not sure if your relationships involve gazing into that non-dualistic spark of deconstructed what-have-you, but for me, deep relationships have involved working through a great deal of discomfort, pain, and conflict.

Again, I don't want pain for the sake of pain. I simply accept that some pain (not all pain is healthy) is inevitable, and an essential aspect of the nature of getting what I want.