This Should Be Christian Not Abrahamic (Yes / No)

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
25 Apr 2012 18:10 #57792 by

Darren wrote: We'd need to have a forum for each. Like 7-Eleven...they're not always doing business, but they're always open. ;)


very well put :D

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
26 Apr 2012 09:07 #57855 by
Problem is, we'd have to make separate SIGs for Western religions: buddhism, thaoism, shintoism and so on, which would be helpful, but the entire section will only get messier.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
26 Apr 2012 13:28 #57871 by
Another idea is that we can eliminate the special interest groups altogether. How can we stand as a united front, when we so willingly categorize and seperate ourselves. We should spend less time focusing on what makes us uniquie, and more time on what brings us together!

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
26 Apr 2012 13:32 #57874 by
I still don't fully understand the reason of the SIGs

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
26 Apr 2012 13:35 #57876 by
I would imagine they were originally created to be a more specific resource for people of other faiths. What i have trouble seeing is why people feel the need to narrow their resources in such a way. Would not a multitude of opinions, and a wider array of backgrounds, lead to a more concise and useful answer to a question?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
26 Apr 2012 15:38 #57894 by

csmith wrote: Another idea is that we can eliminate the special interest groups altogether. How can we stand as a united front, when we so willingly categorize and seperate ourselves. We should spend less time focusing on what makes us uniquie, and more time on what brings us together!


I understand what you're saying, but why then should we even call this religion 'Jediism'?

Why not call it 'Humanism' since we're all humans...

Don't get me wrong I understand the negative aspects of classification, and I understand why they are ultimately meaningless. But as long as you understand that there is no reason to be against them for organisational purposes

If I want to find what views Christian/Islamic/Jewish etc... Jedi have on Jediism then it is useful to have a place that I can go to to find those views easily

Imagine not having any differentiation... everything would be in a part of the forum called 'Jediism' and we wouldn't be able to find a thing because it would be one massive mess of completely different posts and ideas...

Extreme example of course, but it illustrates my point that I think it is important to have separate forums for separate ideas

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
26 Apr 2012 15:52 #57899 by
I can see your point on this. I honestly don't have an idea that would maintain the organizational level. I also do not think that dividing the SIGs further is a wise decision either. Think of all the "religions" out there and how many empty tabs it would generate. You could also take it one step further and you will have people who want sections for their specific denomination, i.e. catholic, baptist, sunni, theraveda, etc. This could lead to feelings of isolation, which may cause individuals to leave, or feel unwanted.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
26 Apr 2012 19:12 #57934 by

csmith wrote: I can see your point on this. I honestly don't have an idea that would maintain the organizational level. I also do not think that dividing the SIGs further is a wise decision either. Think of all the "religions" out there and how many empty tabs it would generate. You could also take it one step further and you will have people who want sections for their specific denomination, i.e. catholic, baptist, sunni, theraveda, etc. This could lead to feelings of isolation, which may cause individuals to leave, or feel unwanted.


I agree with that completely

We have no need to divide them further. Maybe one day we will... but at the moment I think the way we have them is fine

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
02 May 2012 07:28 #58659 by
It seems rather common for families of origin to refuse to change. Like in The Last Samurai. It could be exactly like Christianity and those people would refuse to define themselves differently from what their ancestors were.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
02 May 2012 07:33 #58660 by
in addition, I just realized what you've been talking about on the separation issues. I have to say that, in my opinion, it's overdoing things dividing religions into so many denominations as it is. Christianity itself is broken down into hundreds of "slightly different religions." Political people have even spoken of trying to cut out a lot of the extra nonsense religions. It's gonna get to the point to where there's even a denomimation separating because they believe Jesus had SHORT hair. People nitpick at things like this, and with religion, everyone believes they're 100% right.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Moderators: ZerokevlarVerheilenChaotishRabeRiniTaviKhwang