www.templeofthejediorder.com

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
14 Aug 2007 20:05 #5842 by
Replied by on topic Re:www.templeofthejediorder.com
So perhaps a little unity of the masses would not go amiss...after all, there is strength in numbers.

Let the voice of the people be heard...We don't want this!
The topic has been locked.
  • Jon
  • Offline
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • May the Dark Side of the Force serve you well!
More
14 Aug 2007 20:08 #5843 by Jon
Replied by Jon on topic Re:www.templeofthejediorder.com
So lets stop. And talk to the apropriate persons over the PM system. Please!

The author of the TOTJO simple and solemn oath, the liturgy book, holy days, the FAQ and the Canon Law. Ordinant of GM Mark and Master Jestor.
The topic has been locked.
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
14 Aug 2007 20:18 #5844 by
Replied by on topic Re:www.templeofthejediorder.com
Slight problem with that...mine still don't work.

And not all issues need to be privatized. Sometimes people need to speak out and let the \"admin\" know that things are out of line, otherwise, the observing public is led to think that you are in agreement with things as they are.

We tried to keep this privatized, but apparently while we do that, the truth continually gets distorted. So, I ask you, what other options have we?

We tried live and let live, and WOULD AGAIN, if JHP's incessant assaults on us would JUST STOP. Talk to your \"leader\" and tell him that this is how you feel.

Otherwise, I challenge you to look at things from our perspective. We didn't ask for this, and we didn't start it. But we are not backing down until we are left alone. This is not between us, but we keep getting stuck in the middle of it. JHP's behavior is not professional or appropriate, and as his appointed representatives, you all bear responsibility in how this plays out, As do we all.

What we are asking for, is to be allowed to exist in peace with no further disruption. That's it.
The topic has been locked.
  • Jon
  • Offline
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • May the Dark Side of the Force serve you well!
More
14 Aug 2007 20:53 #5845 by Jon
Replied by Jon on topic Re:www.templeofthejediorder.com
“Too great a preoccupation with motives (especially one's own motive) is liable to lead to too little concern for consequences.”

Katherine Whitehorn

The author of the TOTJO simple and solemn oath, the liturgy book, holy days, the FAQ and the Canon Law. Ordinant of GM Mark and Master Jestor.
The topic has been locked.
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
14 Aug 2007 21:23 #5848 by
Replied by on topic Re:www.templeofthejediorder.com
Ok... I'm not angry, so please don't take it as such, but my post was meant as a message of peace. For the membership of both orders, who have both lost members over this issue, to put it behind us and be able to share our brotherhood in the Force together. Why is that so hard to understand? I wasn't dredging it up, I was responding with a message of peace, from one Jedi to other Jedi. Why must there be conflict? If what I posted, word for word, had come from one of the members here, would the message have still been lost in translation? Look to the message within the post, not just the name of the person, in this case me, who posted it. Please? And then see for yourself the meaning. You basically re-itterated one of the basic points I was trying to make in my post, but in a different manner, instead casting a negative light on my posting it. We are Jedi, my friend... let's share that brotherhood, that's all I ask.

~Master Kyp
The topic has been locked.
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
14 Aug 2007 21:46 #5849 by
Replied by on topic Re:www.templeofthejediorder.com
KFC,
How is it that your PM still does not work and yet you PMed me the other day?
The topic has been locked.
  • Jon
  • Offline
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • May the Dark Side of the Force serve you well!
More
14 Aug 2007 22:06 #5850 by Jon
Replied by Jon on topic Re:www.templeofthejediorder.com
I appreciate your words. Thank you. The last thing I also want is a conflict. But many, including myself, suffered. As I already said some left. This shouldn`t happen again. I appologise if there was any misunderstanding (which has nothing to do with your name) on my part. MTFBWY.

The author of the TOTJO simple and solemn oath, the liturgy book, holy days, the FAQ and the Canon Law. Ordinant of GM Mark and Master Jestor.
The topic has been locked.
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
15 Aug 2007 01:10 #5859 by
Replied by on topic Re:www.templeofthejediorder.com
I can only reiterate why we are so insistant through Master Dunn's words:

It is very important for a company or organization to own the dot.com of it's registered name.

Even though they may be non-profit it is important to retain ownership of the highest level which the dot.com signifies.

The .org .net .com package should all be retained as net for intranet and backoffice organization, .com on the profit side or as a pointer to .org if the org is nonprofit. These matter and it is perceived that the owner of the .com actually is the originator of said name.
The topic has been locked.
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
15 Aug 2007 02:03 #5860 by
Replied by on topic Re:www.templeofthejediorder.com
Well, as I said... that's a Todd and John thing. The TOTJF has absolutely no control or bearing on that URL. Though I trust you will also be pressing a lawsuit on KC Avalon for www.TOTJO.com as well? It is, after all, a .com of the TOTJO's registered name.
The topic has been locked.
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
15 Aug 2007 02:25 #5861 by
Replied by on topic Re:www.templeofthejediorder.com
Ordo wrote:

Well, as I said... that's a Todd and John thing. The TOTJF has absolutely no control or bearing on that URL. Though I trust you will also be pressing a lawsuit on KC Avalon for www.TOTJO.com as well? It is, after all, a .com of the TOTJO's registered name.


Don't be coy or sarcastic Kyp...I am merely explaining why we are so insistant with Todd about getting that URL. I know TOTJF doesn't own it and has no control over that but it would be great if we could get their support in asking Todd to sell it to us. Any chance of seeing that support?
The topic has been locked.
Moderators: MorkanoWrenPhoenixThe CoyoteRiniTaviKhwang