light sabers and martale arts

Moderators: Desolous, Reliah

light sabers and martale arts 03 Mar 2011 19:51 #37013

  • spaceace
  • spaceace's Avatar
in my room i have quite the lightsbaer collection as i use that term looseley for they are on toys and one prop replica. i also own one sword but i want to know if their is anyone in ontario canada u can tell me were their might be a kendo school. so that i can get more in touch with that part of my self. i will be buying my own kendo stick soon its just the armour is going take me some time to find. and as for the opened hand im loking at takeing kung fu as my opend hand martial arts.

Re:light sabers and martale arts 08 Mar 2011 06:46 #37107

Just for information ;)

In Kendo there are no sticks, if you take up the art you will be using Bamboo Shinai With a Tsuba or a Bokken you may also need a Keokogi and Hakama .

Also if you are going to be practicing Kendo why not look into a Japanese open handed Martial Art i.e. Tai Jutsu as you may find it will go hand in hand with your Kendo.

I wish you luck in your training and hope you find a Sensei that will guide you on your pathway.


Re:light sabers and martale arts 09 Mar 2011 07:59 #37137

  • Jestor
  • Jestor's Avatar
  • Councillor
  • Bishop
  • ID: 3682
As Keith (I was going to say Master Mewes as a sign if respect in Martial Arts, but as you are not yet a Master here st TOTJO, I did not want to confuse other members, but know I do have great respect.... ;)....) was suggesting, make sure you check all martial arts available to you in your area...

Some may fit better, than others... I would follow Keith's advice... I have limited knowledge in other styles... I am just a TKD practioner....

Investigate all you can before making a decision...

Good Luck ...
Rite: PureLand
Master: Master Jasper_Ward
Graduated Apprentices: Knight Learn_To_Know, Edan, Knight Brenna, Senior Knight Firewolf
Apprentices: Viskhard, DanWerts, Elizabeth, Llama Su, Trisskar

Life is just a party, and parties weren't made to last..." ~1999 by Prince~

"Questions and answers, sometimes there are no answers and sometimes the answer is yet more questions." ~Elizabeth~

"I don't have any answers, only more questions..." ~me~

Re:light sabers and martale arts 27 Mar 2011 01:17 #37628

  • Natalia
  • Natalia's Avatar
Well spaceace, i dont know of any schools in ontario but i happen to live in alberta and have 11 years experiance in various hand weaopons such as swords but more in staffs. Perhaps in the summer i can visit or we can just set up webcam?

Re:light sabers and martale arts 27 Mar 2011 02:01 #37630

Greetings Each

Well Keith Renshi is my Master as such but not here..and I am confused..all the time lol.

Totally agree with Keith Renshi and Master Jester. All I would add is, Please try to find a club that has traditional ethics and etiquette.

Yours in the spirit of Budo

Yours in the Spirit of Budo


I am everything, nothing and all that is in between, I am, KI :)

Re:light sabers and martale arts 30 Mar 2011 04:18 #37719

Jestor wrote:
As Keith (I was going to say Master Mewes as a sign if respect in Martial Arts, but as you are not yet a Master here st TOTJO, I did not want to confuse other members, but know I do have great respect.... ;)....) was suggesting, make sure you check all martial arts available to you in your area...

Master Jester,

Thank you for your kind and respectful words.

You have my full respect as a Master and Martial Artist.

I look forward to talking with you again soon .

Latest Posts Comments Articles
    • [Science] - Orcas are first non-humans whose evolu... (Last post by Gisteron)
    • Not sure about the first, but certainly not the only ones. Chimps and Orangutans, too, develop recognizable behavioural differences that can most easily be described as cultural.
    • Jedi Parenting (Last post by thomaswfaulkner)
    • Side story before I get to the main point: I was raised in a devout Christian family for a large portion of my life. It wasn't until after I enlisted in the military when I began to grow skeptical of my family's religiosity and sought the answers to philosophical questions outside of the faith. There was a small part of my teenage life where I questioned the existence of a higher power, but I came out to my parents at a time where I was not ready to fully accept being different. As an adult, they still have their doubts of my choices concerning religion and often make it a subject of taboo when I am around. It literally gets to the point where they feel uncomfortable talking about their volunteerism at the church and the conversation begins to teeter off when I begin to chime in: even though I mention I love how active they are and openly support their right to their beliefs. They feel as if it is offensive for me to hear it. (Like I will literally catch on fire at the sound of the word church.) Now the point I was going to make: When I stepped into the role of a parent (and might I add, I wanted to start at a younger age insomuch that I retained some of my vitality in my children's adolescence) I was just exploring my position as an atheist. Looking back, I saw myself as a bit of an antagonist and sought to ruffle the feather to people whose views differed from mine by wearing standoffish clothes that displayed my viewpoints. The biggest reality check for me was when my oldest daughter (who is now six) told me that she wanted to go to church with my parents. At first, I immediately thought to myself, "Well, crap! No...She is too young to make such a large decision like that and it is my job as her parent to shield her from that contagious dogma." It took me several weeks to come to that "Aha!" moment and realize that I was kind of being a jerk to her. I forgot that she is growing up and I failed to support her in that decision. Religion wasn't ever the forefront of conversation within our household. My wife is an open Christian and we decided early in our marriage that we would avoid teaching our children about religion until there were old enough to understand it's principles. And there's me...standing in the way of my own fear of isolation and disallowing her to pursue what she felt was right. She built up the confidence to ask me about something in which she found interesting and I shot it down. Ever since that moment, I have made a conscious effort to allow my children to identify with who they are and focus our parenting on skills in which I would only hope they would mirror (of course, I would hope they would scrutinize my wife and I's failures and do what works for them). I want my children to grow up with a sense of empowerment. Once they get a little older, I know they will begin to ask questions about their spiritual needs and their sense of religious belonging. I hope that they look to my wife and I as guides who will assist them as they find out who they are, and not totally rely on us to answer that question for them. TL;DR: I was an atheist who didn't allow my child to explore religion. I had a revelation and now I focus on letting them make more life choices about who they are and who they want to be.
    • Sinful delight (Last post by Adi)
    • Quote: I also think that in Europe, all that stuff was still considered sinful, but they really didn't give a shit and partied anyhow. Good old Europe... ;) Alcohol, at least, was one of those things that was considered fine in moderation, and that feeling even made its way over to America with the Puritans. The fantastically-named Puritan minister Increase Mather wrote in 1673, "Drink is in itself a good creature of God, and to be received with thankfulness, but the abuse of drink is from Satan; the wine is from God, but the drunkard is from the Devil." Obviously, if you were a priest or other sort of clergy, you were expected to abstain entirely, but you were also expected to abstain from "fun" things like sex and marriage (unless you were a Puritan like Mather, who had a famous son named Cotton.) As for the ordinary folk, it's not much of a surprise that taverns were and still are so common across Europe and even in colonial New England with all its Puritanical sensibilities. Temperance/abstention is a fairly modern concept even though it does have its roots with the Puritans of old. After the American Revolution, a lot of the social upheaval of the time (more to do with urbanization and less to do with booze) was blamed on alcohol, hence the temperance movement that endured into the 20th century. Until then, the idea of drinking in moderation was the historic stance of the Church both before and after the Reformation - dating back to the early medieval period, at least. Plus, properly brewed beer was a hell of a lot safer than just drinking water. An amusing fact I learned studying pre-Revolution America is that people who could afford it even had it with breakfast, especially in England and the Colonies.
    • A cashless society and chip Implants (Last post by Trisskar)
    • Quote: Whats really interesting is when people get older, many here, will need pacemakers, or some kind of replacement surgery(kness and hips are big as one ages), and will probably do so without a second thought. I most certianly will give such implanted aides a second, third, fourth and fifth thought if at all sanely possible. Simply put. I don't like implanting things into my body (I don't even have any piercings or tattoos) . Pretty simple and personal. No other political/social/egotistical baggage required.
    • The Grateful Thread (Last post by Edan)
    • I am grateful to have found a way to cope with it, even if it does look a little like denial :/
    • Donald Trump - Noam Chomsky discusses (Last post by Alethea Thompson)
    • Quote: “So every time Trump makes a nasty comment about whoever, his popularity goes up. Because it’s based on hate, you know, hate and fear” Chomsky argued. “And it’s unfortunately kind of reminiscent of something unpleasant: Germany, not many years ago.” Quote: “He’s a clown — literally, he could be in the circus,” Chomsky said. “He’s getting huge support from people who are angry at everything. Mostly white males. Working-class, middle-class, poor white males. And their wives and traditional families. They are furious about everything.” Correlation is not causation. Has Noam actually sat down and done a study on why people are voting for Trump vs. no other candidate? Can he prove that it is not because there is hate on the other side (all those protests that are sparked because of perceived hate from Trump)? Can Noam prove that it’s not simply a matter of the voters preferring Trump not being a career politician? Or that it’s because they simply like his policies? See him as a good leader? Etc? Or is it all speculation based on what Noam believes he is seeing? I suspect it is the latter. He’s not provided us with anything which proves he performed Quantitative and/or Qualitative Research to back his claims. He’s spitting out the same information that everyone else is spitting out. Which makes his voice no less important than anyone else’s voice. Not exactly a bad thing, but it’s also why people will not decide their vote based on what he or anyone else like him has to say. It needs to be something completely new, a different approach. The problems: Bernie Sanders – Many of the people that are voting for him seem to be in the younger demographic. The older the democratic voters are the more likely they are to vote for Clinton. This suggests that the older generations are completely disillusioned by the concept of socialism because they see what it has led to in other countries that implemented it. Yes, even in Scandinavian countries. This also might suggest why you cannot find a whole lot of Clinton supporters online, the older generations are not getting into the social media scene the same way that younger generations are. Hillary Clinton – E-mails and Benghazi, need I say more? That seems to be the largest issue people have with Clinton. To be fair to her, I’m still deciding on whether or not Benghazi was merely her fault. I’d need to have more information about the role that Obama played in that one before I condemn her on the issue. The e-mails though? That one is all on her. Many believe that she shouldn’t even be running because she’s under this investigation. Trump – He’s a jerk. That’s the short of it. He also doesn’t have the foreign policy background that is necessary for handling issues abroad. What he does have, that –might- make up for it, is negotiation capability. But there is no telling that that would be enough to overcome the foreign policy issue. And that is rather major to our infrastructure. They all have their good points too, and all of them share the same goal: All of them want to see America’s future improve. They all have different approaches, different ideas on how that works. You might not see it that way with Trump, but consider this- what is good for Trump’s business is good for America in the long run. In office he would be able to control things in America in a way he can’t control abroad. If he can make it more profitable to do business in America than to do it in another country, that brings jobs back here, and he gets more gains in his own finances. As for the democrats, I don’t think I have to explain to you how they see themselves as making America better. Seems to me that most of you are democrats already- and therefore should already know. :D Anyways, it’s also something to note that just because Trump is being equated to Hitler doesn’t mean that he will be Hitler. People equate Sanders to Hitler as well. Clinton, however, hasn’t….but she’s Clinton….soooooo… BUT guess what!!!! President Obama has also been compared to Hitler. Originally posted in 2010, a holocaust survivor speaks on how Obama is just…like….Hitler! Yet in all of his time in the Oval office- Obama hasn’t become the genocidal maniac Hitler was.
    • Question of the Day (Last post by MadHatter)
    • If you could wake up tomorrow having gained one ability or quality what would it be? Please answer in your own journal.
    • ADD HEALING REQUESTS HERE!! (Last post by peace)
    • Warm hopes and wishes to everyone dearly. I'm sorry to hear what all of you are and have been going through. It's not easy and I understand that. As an apprentice, I too have experienced some traumatic events and looked to all of you for guidance. These types of threads are what brings our community together to become one and allows us to get to know others more on a deeper level. As my lasting words in this post, I just want to say, don't be afraid to let yourself be heard and don't hold back your deepest feelings about anything. These things hold us back from progressing in our paths. MTFBWY all.
    • Who are the Jedi? (Last post by Joda Sett)
    • That's where I feel the sermon was going, but the definition of sin as a violation of a religious or moral law (Webster's) makes me think more of it.
    • Love vs Attachment (Last post by rugadd)
    • Love, for me, is to appreciate something(or someone) for what it is. In the case of life, it should be nurtured and allowed to grow. Attachment is a liar. It tells you something in your mind that is often quite different from what is happening. The Jedi path is a very personal one. I cannot speak to what would be best for the community.

There are 121 visitors, one guest and 19 members online (one in chat): Firewolf, Proteus, Alexandre Orion, Kit, Avalonslight, tzb, Arkayik, FTPC, Atticus509, Adi, Tellahane, Hyrum Tigerprice, MadHatter, Kyrin Wyldstar, Snowy Aftermath, FAT, x57z12, Walsh635211, thomaswfaulkner, CableSteele.

Follow Us