SITH?

  • User
  • User
More
01 Mar 2013 22:12 #96331 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
I will admit that it might seem like my allegience could seem like Bias

but this is all fact, nothing is assumption.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
01 Mar 2013 22:55 #96339 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
lets not get into the whole 'even fact is perception' thing, then.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • ren
  • Offline
  • Member
  • Member
  • Council Member
  • Council Member
  • Not anywhere near the back of the bus
More
02 Mar 2013 01:31 #96352 by ren
Replied by ren on topic Re: SITH?
Let's get into the "known fact is perception of actual fact" thing instead then :D :whistle:

Convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jestor

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
02 Mar 2013 09:05 #96368 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
Oh Sorry, i really couldnt help myself uploading this comical profile picture. Yes i made it to 'pass?' the first official 'sithism' test, then wrote to the creator and withdrew my subscription when i really approached the word ,.. endarkenment.

I hate it. I like Chi Gung, i have a site chigung3.blogspot.com, and a heap of experiences with it. But this term endarkenment is strange when chi gung is generally an enlighenment subject.

Although, if u think about it, endarkenment is just a cleaver perspective, but a very bad term. It acknowledges that our current science also stems from many centuries in the past. Stuff like occult, runes, hebrew, enouchian, starwars, certainly was perhaps a long long time ago if in this universe. So, yes endarkenment is correct, but i really hate that term, so i quit before i joined. Plus im more jedi, if i wanted to believe in it.

Its very interesting that its creator had an apparition from another galaxy. It seems they also feel they on earth are the only remaining sith left in the galaxy, i think i read. I find that a bit hard to believe. The galaxy would be rather infinitely big, perhaps.

I just commented, that they are really into their stuff at sith academy, and they all talk on the forums, yes master, oh master where art thou, i just thought it was all a bit serious. I just liked the movies, played for yrs online as master goo, fps games, and have a deep belief in i chi gung.

I think theres a youtube video of an old taoist who moves bricks, pushes a pale of water, and breaks a glass with chi. Very easy to find, he also sharpens knives on his chest. Just one of those things those crazy buddhist monks are capable of. Isnt that the same as the force.

Every martial art is supposedly started from the 13th century shien shang dynasty or so said in the classic harmonising the tiger and dragon classic. But isnt that a bit arrogent, isnt star wars before the 13th century.

Oh well, i read a lot of essays on clairvoyant readings from the long lost sith people in the galaxy, and one guy said it all got downloaded into his head, and hes gradually remembering more. perhaps this does push the bounds of are u insane ? But similiaily i have a an elderly ladys clarivoyant book, cosmic prophercies, and she talks of the ashtar command, and goes into details that we are surrounded. I guess they could be both right, or probably both very wrong. But i even have family relatives that have the ability to go into trance addresses at clairvoyant churches, flower readings etc, and they do healing via the phone, simply using visualisation of blue light. At one stage she could feel me move the chi around her body, and could easily tell what pens i had on my table from her house.

It really makes me think, did the sith creator really just invent a new sith character to delusinally listen to, or is it that we in this reality dont know of this character, yet.

Also, i just made this short comical view of chi gung...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uYI8HAx-_o

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
02 Mar 2013 12:51 #96371 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
Tl, dr. I take it your a sith, tho? There are several off you already here. Big whoop.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
02 Mar 2013 13:01 #96372 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
No, i tried to just say that, the profile pic was just comical.

I really thought about changing to sith recently, mainly cause they asked u to try to relate your life to anakins, and i found so many dark bits in my life.

In the end, its best not to focus on them, and just move on.

100 percent jedi, with the jediism blogspot.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
02 Mar 2013 13:11 #96373 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
Cool, welcome then, brother. But I got my eye on you, just in case ;)

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
02 Mar 2013 16:03 #96384 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?

Super Goo wrote: Every martial art is supposedly started from the 13th century shien shang dynasty or so said in the classic harmonising the tiger and dragon classic.


That and we have historical evidence of martial arts in the east and west that predate that as well.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
02 Mar 2013 17:50 #96388 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
All human beings are commingled out of good and evil. Robert Louis Stevenson

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
03 Mar 2013 02:10 #96442 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?

Bastian wrote: A good night's sleep gave me some new thoughts on that topic I'd lik to share:

For years I spend time in several forums of Jediism and Sithism. I don't wanna be disrespectful, insulting or talk down the opinion of anyone, but let's talk straight a moment. Honesty is the first virtue of a Jedi. This is only my opinion.

"Sith" is (like hate or love or Jedi) a word that loses weight and meaning the more often and casually you use it.
Don't get fooled by some of the Star Wars media. Lots of it is intended to simply entertain and to be sold to all-age audiences as part of a huge merchandise machine. So yes, we all love Darth Maul's bodyart and we all like Revan. We love watching Ian McDiramid playing the role of Palpatine and Anakins is still the romantic hero though he slays younglings...
But we are not fictional characters. Things are real out here.

A Sith is someone who thinks that he himself has a right above all others to prevail and gain power and that all others who do not join their cause are lesser beings. Lesser beings. Go out there and tell somebody of your choice in the face that he or she is a lesser being, worth only to serve like a slave to a cause they would not even unterstand in the first place because it is way above their savage heads...
And I'm convinced the majority of people here would not walk their dark talks in earnest, because in their hearts they know it's neither right nor does it make any sense.

Seriously guys, a lot of "Dark Siders" dont know what their talking about. I'm from Germany. My country's history crawls with people who thought in Ubermensch terms and strove for power over all others. These people are not devils or demons either, but just really bad human beings. But nonetheless they play in a whole different league than most of the black-clad adolescent Dark Siders that exist on the internet.

I got to know a lot of Dark Siders and most of them are just good guys with a good heart but who wrap themselves in rough outsides.
Unfortunately there are a lot of one-sided views on the Light Side out there, that drive young men and women to the thought they must be Dark Side. But there is no reason a Jedi can't hold strength, or be a gruffy character or be self-assured and straight to the point with a no-bullsh*t attitude (see Mace Windu, Tholme, Quinlan Vos or Kyp Durron). Light Side means plurality and tolerance. Jedi also improve themselves - they SEEK to improve themselves through knowledge and training. But not solely themselves.

I am a man who likes martial arts. I played in a metal band. I'm very self-assured about my values and opinions. I don't wear beige robes. I dont't like all-is-flowers worldviews and am very critical about the moral wordviews the majority of people have worldwide. But I am not a Dark Sider. I like working for the Light - for what is good and right and just. The Light Side is plurality - the Dark Side is not. It is egoistic and centralized.

Not sharing the need for a common wellbeing but only sticking to one's own business, does not make you Sith. It just makes you a loner. So whoever partakes in this forum, discussing in a nice civilized fashion and has friends amongst all other "Sides" is not Sith. The Sith are a very aggressive community that holds no tolerance, no compassion and no "proper behavior". That Triple Moon Lady who got banned recently may not have shined with wisdom, but she definetley had the darker attitude. Don't fool yourself by romantic views of the hard-hearted black knight. "Absolute power" is not compatible with friendship and virtues like honor or dignity.

In my opinion a lot of Dark Siders fall victim to roleplay, pretending their are something they are not. On one hand, that is good. Nobody needs Sith. On the other hand it is sad, because no one should waste his precious time with building castles in the air. Nobody knows that better then someone who follows the idea of becoming a real Jedi. ;)


Without me being mad, I would like to say that to my eyes, this looks incredibly condescending, and when you make these sweeping generalizations without explanation, even when you pad your statements with 'I know this guy who', it makes you sound like you have no idea what you're talking about.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
11 Mar 2013 06:28 #97339 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?

Super Goo wrote: Every martial art is supposedly started from the 13th century shien shang dynasty or so said in the classic harmonising the tiger and dragon classic.


wrong, what about Khridoli?

that was established before the birth of christ and it is still taught today

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
11 Mar 2013 06:46 #97340 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
The first book that contained information about I Chi Gung was written sometime during early 700 B.C. The book was called the Yellow Emporer's Classic of Internal Medicine. The Jade Pendant Inscriptions were recorded on an artifact around 380 B.C, and about 150 years after that Hua Tuo, 'The Father of Chinese Medicine,' created the 'Five Play Animal'. More than 600 years later, sometime during A.D 500, a Buddhist monk from India named Da Mo, travelled to China and developed a series of exercises to make monks stronger and healthier. He then wrote the famouse Bone Marrow Washing Classic. Chi Gung was further developed during the Tang Dynasty in the fifth century A.D, when Sun Si Miao created the six healing sounds after noticing their therapeutic effects on the body." ,... like the beginnings of chi, the body is an evolving pattern of vibrational energy, and can be stimulated and healed through the use of sound.

I think i was refering to this text.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
11 Mar 2013 10:20 #97355 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?

Super Goo wrote: The first book that contained information about I Chi Gung was written sometime during early 700 B.C. The book was called the Yellow Emporer's Classic of Internal Medicine. The Jade Pendant Inscriptions were recorded on an artifact around 380 B.C, and about 150 years after that Hua Tuo, 'The Father of Chinese Medicine,' created the 'Five Play Animal'. More than 600 years later, sometime during A.D 500, a Buddhist monk from India named Da Mo, travelled to China and developed a series of exercises to make monks stronger and healthier. He then wrote the famouse Bone Marrow Washing Classic. Chi Gung was further developed during the Tang Dynasty in the fifth century A.D, when Sun Si Miao created the six healing sounds after noticing their therapeutic effects on the body." ,... like the beginnings of chi, the body is an evolving pattern of vibrational energy, and can be stimulated and healed through the use of sound.

I think i was refering to this text.


my issue was that you claimed that all martial art stems from the shieng shang dynasty, and that simply isn't true

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
11 Mar 2013 11:51 #97366 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?

ferreire580 wrote: All human beings are commingled out of good and evil. Robert Louis Stevenson


Yin Yang baby, Yin Yang.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
13 Mar 2013 11:35 #97675 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?

triplemoon wrote: everyone lies and war have been started my weak parasites hahahahahahahaha


wait, wait, wait....
we are weak parasites?
but our conflict is big enough to be deemed a war?

I know you got banned but seriously guys, this is just hilarious!

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
13 Mar 2013 11:39 #97676 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?

suliskveteba wrote:

Xon-Tay Lor wrote: Well it seems pretty obvious to me that the Abrahamic religions are bent on obtaining power, so I'm not sure why you would forgive them.


I am eastern orthodox, which is abrahamic

and it has nothing to do with obtaining power

and this proves you know nothing about orthodoxy

and don't you dare say that orthodoxy is a minority

it is the second highest subscription of christianity

and you just misinterpreted every single orthodox christian's beliefs



I am sorry if I sound angry, but let me make my point

western christianity is responsible for hypocritical views and horrible violence

both of which have no connection to orthodoxy

but since orthodoxy is christianity

it gets enveloped in judgement

ironically, atheists call christianity out for being judgemental

yet as an orthodox christian, I have been judged for being christian

I guess you could say I am dissapointed, I just hoped that nobody in TOTJO was this freaking ignorant and plain stupid


ergh! wow I sounded like a tantrumy child, I am not trying to bring myself down

I can laugh at myself, this is funny

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
13 Mar 2013 12:07 - 13 Mar 2013 12:10 #97678 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
When one loses the ability to laugh at themselves, then one must be asked 'why art thou so solemn?'
Last edit: 13 Mar 2013 12:10 by . Reason: serious to solemn

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 Mar 2013 12:23 #97679 by Jestor
Replied by Jestor on topic Re: SITH?

Super Goo wrote: The first book that contained information about I Chi Gung was written sometime during early 700 B.C. The book was called the Yellow Emporer's Classic of Internal Medicine. The Jade Pendant Inscriptions were recorded on an artifact around 380 B.C, and about 150 years after that Hua Tuo, 'The Father of Chinese Medicine,' created the 'Five Play Animal'. More than 600 years later, sometime during A.D 500, a Buddhist monk from India named Da Mo, travelled to China and developed a series of exercises to make monks stronger and healthier. He then wrote the famouse Bone Marrow Washing Classic. Chi Gung was further developed during the Tang Dynasty in the fifth century A.D, when Sun Si Miao created the six healing sounds after noticing their therapeutic effects on the body." ,... like the beginnings of chi, the body is an evolving pattern of vibrational energy, and can be stimulated and healed through the use of sound.

I think i was refering to this text.

From wiki, with the wiki sources cited, Wiki wrote: Qigong history

Origins and ancient history

Archeological evidence suggests that the first forms of qigong can be linked to ancient shamanic meditative practice and gymnastic exercises.[2] For example, a nearly 7000 year old Neolithic vessel depicts a priest-shaman (wu xi 巫覡) in the essential posture of meditative practice and gymnastic exercise of early qigong. Shamanic rituals and ideas eventually evolved and formalized into Taoist beliefs and were incorporated into the field of traditional Chinese medicine.[3][4]


3. Unschuld, Paul U (1985). Medicine in China: a History of Ideas. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-05023-1.
4. Porkert, Manfred (1974). The Theoretical Foundations of Chinese Medicine: Systems of Correspondence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-16058-7.


May I ask your source?

triplemoon wrote: everyone lies and war have been started my weak parasites hahahahahahahaha


wait, wait, wait....
we are weak parasites?
but our conflict is big enough to be deemed a war?

I know you got banned but seriously guys, this is just hilarious!


Just a Troll.. Possibly from a Sith site, that just finds themselves entertaining...

Desolous wrote: When one loses the ability to laugh at themselves, then one must be asked 'why art thou so solemn?'


Wow, insightful...

Where ever did you read that?
;)

On walk-about...

Sith ain't Evil...
Jedi ain't Saints....


"Bake or bake not. There is no fry" - Sean Ching


Rite: PureLand
Former Memeber of the TOTJO Council
Master: Jasper_Ward
Current Apprentices: Viskhard, DanWerts, Llama Su, Trisskar
Former Apprentices: Knight Learn_To_Know, Knight Edan, Knight Brenna, Knight Madhatter
The following user(s) said Thank You: Adder,

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
03 Apr 2013 06:00 #101172 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
what you have said doesn't make any sense, you talk like they should be taken seriously yet upload a comical photo satiring them? I do agree that perhaps Imperius is well spoken and at times, but that doesn't mean they include detail in what they say, their blogs are repetitive and they use like a thousand words when two would suffice.

Super Goo wrote: I think theres a website called sith academy.

They are extremely knowledgeable there, and very strong in their side of the force. I found their forum, although small as it hasnt been around for a long time, very detailed, with some very well spoken individuals.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
03 Apr 2013 07:08 #101175 by
Replied by on topic Re: SITH?
Yes u are correct, u put it very well, 1000's words when 2 would suffice. Which is why i said impressed. Imperious is well spoken is also true. I didnt stumble on the word repetitive, as i didnt spend long readingm and skimmed over it. I dont take anyone seriously that accepts a faith to such an extent they choose to follow it. Star wars, is a sci fi movie. But dreams inspire directors who write films. The very idea of star wars is possibly from the sub conscious. The sub conscious is a reflection of the conscious, so perhaps a star wars universe might be out there, but that said, so is a riddick universe, a matrix universe, and a starship troopers universe, and possibly a neronomincan world. Just saying the akastic records could be from the infinite reality M theory bubble pair universe, where perhaps these directors get their ideas during sleep.

I dont really think a 7000 year old picture of a priest in his number 2 position over the toilet, could be described as an early form of chigung. Same as those incan pictures people go at great length to say are really tablets of ufos from 4000 years ago. Really, i cant recall which book amongst mine i got my info from, why so defensive in our belief system, that any word, requires endless references to support its anti-floccinaucinihilipilification.

I think that was one of my best photos this decade, and now that ive mastered the art of extracting cinibar and loadstone out of my belly button, just gotta sort out what is fluff and what is not, i really doubt that my picture will change much over the next few hundred years.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Moderators: MorkanoWrenPhoenixThe CoyoteRiniTaviKhwang