Meeting of the Clergy 23 April 2016 18:00 UTC

  • User
  • User
More
25 Apr 2016 17:53 - 25 Apr 2016 17:55 #239116 by

Trisskar wrote: I was asked to explain my reasoning behind the Leveled Preiets ranks. Thought id share it here....

I just looked up the Latin Name for each color XD And then used the common colors seen in druidry and other pagan circles.

Deacon ---> Lvl I - Brunis (Brown) Priest/Priestess
Priest ---> Lvl II - Viride (Green) Priest/Priestess
Bishop ---> Lvl III Album (White) Priest/Priestess


Brown being the Earth and Soil in which seeds grow from

Green being the foliage and growth of plants and life

White being the usual "Purity" symbolism it usually holds
Which, Depending on who you talk to ---- Is just another level of beginner :-p In other words one went from one level of begginer to another level. In which case the White will eventually return to brown with the hardship of training ((White Belt Japanese theory))


I enjoy latin, and I like the way how you use changing trades of a living organism inside ranks! It also reminds me of the Maiar in the Tolkien series. If there was only a blue rank in it.. :)
Last edit: 25 Apr 2016 17:55 by .

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Apr 2016 18:02 #239118 by Avalon
I do like that Triss :)

[Hr]

I just wanted to clarify that I (and I'm sure others who have spoken out in regards to this change) am not against it changing. I simply just want whatever the change is to be relateable to the outside world. I happen to really like some of the suggestions which have come through and like that quite a few of them are far more spiritually significant than the currently suggested "guide". Change is good, just make it the right change, for the right reason, and something that can be meaningful to everyone, not just a few in our organization.

Not all those who wander are lost
Studies Journal | Personal Journal
The following user(s) said Thank You:

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
25 Apr 2016 18:03 #239119 by

Aqua wrote:

Trisskar wrote: I was asked to explain my reasoning behind the Leveled Preiets ranks. Thought id share it here....

I just looked up the Latin Name for each color XD And then used the common colors seen in druidry and other pagan circles.

Deacon ---> Lvl I - Brunis (Brown) Priest/Priestess
Priest ---> Lvl II - Viride (Green) Priest/Priestess
Bishop ---> Lvl III Album (White) Priest/Priestess


Brown being the Earth and Soil in which seeds grow from

Green being the foliage and growth of plants and life

White being the usual "Purity" symbolism it usually holds
Which, Depending on who you talk to ---- Is just another level of beginner :-p In other words one went from one level of begginer to another level. In which case the White will eventually return to brown with the hardship of training ((White Belt Japanese theory))


I enjoy latin, and I like the way how you use changing trades of a living organism inside ranks! It also reminds me of the Maiar in the Tolkien series. If there was only a blue rank in it.. :)


haha! It also reminds me of the wheel of time series XD they use colors as rank. It is influential to my own groups rank system (IE: Green Magi, Blue Magi, Red Magi....) But thats my group. I thought Priest fit this temple better with the basic "Earth/life" colors to match.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
25 Apr 2016 18:07 #239120 by

Trisskar wrote: I was asked to explain my reasoning behind the Leveled Preiets ranks. Thought id share it here....

I just looked up the Latin Name for each color XD And then used the common colors seen in druidry and other pagan circles.

Deacon ---> Lvl I - Brunis (Brown) Priest/Priestess
Priest ---> Lvl II - Viride (Green) Priest/Priestess
Bishop ---> Lvl III Album (White) Priest/Priestess


Brown being the Earth and Soil in which seeds grow from

Green being the foliage and growth of plants and life

White being the usual "Purity" symbolism it usually holds
Which, Depending on who you talk to ---- Is just another level of beginner :-p In other words one went from one level of begginer to another level. In which case the White will eventually return to brown with the hardship of training ((White Belt Japanese theory))


For what its worth, this totally has my vote.
Nice Job!

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Apr 2016 18:14 #239125 by void

Trisskar wrote:

Deacon ---> Lvl I - Brunis (Brown) Priest/Priestess
Priest ---> Lvl II - Viride (Green) Priest/Priestess
Bishop ---> Lvl III Album (White) Priest/Priestess


"White priest" has its own connotations that, ironically, are Christian in nature.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
25 Apr 2016 18:29 #239126 by

steamboat28 wrote:

Trisskar wrote:

Deacon ---> Lvl I - Brunis (Brown) Priest/Priestess
Priest ---> Lvl II - Viride (Green) Priest/Priestess
Bishop ---> Lvl III Album (White) Priest/Priestess


"White priest" has its own connotations that, ironically, are Christian in nature.


As you yourself have so often pointed out for other subjects.

White Priest has many historical backgrounds. Including religions Before Christianity.

Don't like White. Make it blue then. *Shrugs*

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Br. John
  • Offline
  • Master
  • Master
  • Council Member
  • Council Member
  • Senior Ordained Clergy Person
  • Senior Ordained Clergy Person
  • Founder of The Order
More
25 Apr 2016 19:26 - 25 Apr 2016 19:28 #239139 by Br. John
Let's look at religions that don't have clergy. Let's look at some of the new thought religions. Please keep in mind that when we decide these terms for our purposes when our clergy is registering for hospital visits, to conduct marriages and prison ministry - for example - we can still use the term minister since it's commonly understood so that's not a problem.

We could also have only one level of clergy but have certifications and continuing education certificates. So all Ministers would become Guides (still Ministers for legal purposes) but they'd be:

Certified Marriage Celebrant
Certified Funeral Celebrant
Certified Spiritual Counselor

Doctor Most common: Doctor of Divinity (D.o.D.) or Doctor of Metaphysics (D.o.M.)
Counselor
Life coach
Healing practitioner
Religious Science Practitioner

Let's be creative.

And I urge the use of Chaplain for the highest trained and well versed clergy. The armed forces uses the term irrespective of the religion of the Chaplain. It's very generic and there are even Humanist Chaplains and Charlie Chaplains.

Founder of The Order
Last edit: 25 Apr 2016 19:28 by Br. John.
The following user(s) said Thank You: void

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
25 Apr 2016 20:18 - 25 Apr 2016 20:47 #239157 by

Br. John wrote: Let's look at religions that don't have clergy. Let's look at some of the new thought religions. Please keep in mind that when we decide these terms for our purposes when our clergy is registering for hospital visits, to conduct marriages and prison ministry - for example - we can still use the term minister since it's commonly understood so that's not a problem.


I still hate the word "guide", but as long as I can call myself a minister here and in meatspace, I'd concede for the sake of sanity. This isn't worth killing each other over. I just want to be able to say why I'm in a place (hospital, wedding chapel) without having to annoy a busy hospital receptionist/secretary who doesn't care about our beliefs and just wants to get things done. They shouldn't have to "be curious" to get the point.

We could also have only one level of clergy but have certifications and continuing education certificates. So all Ministers would become Guides (still Ministers for legal purposes) but they'd be:

Certified Marriage Celebrant
Certified Funeral Celebrant
Certified Spiritual Counselor

Doctor Most common: Doctor of Divinity (D.o.D.) or Doctor of Metaphysics (D.o.M.)
Counselor
Life coach
Healing practitioner
Religious Science Practitioner


And the system mentioned here actually feels good. I wonder how much extra work it would be for the folks in charge to keep a handle on all of those gnarly certifications and things though. The number of them seems like it can get a little hairy. Where's Edan with the spreadsheet? :woohoo: :whistle: (I might actually volunteer... on the distant chance we decide to do something so different from what we're already doing.)

And I urge the use of Chaplain for the highest trained and well versed clergy. The armed forces uses the term irrespective of the religion of the Chaplain. It's very generic and there are even Humanist Chaplains and Charlie Chaplains.


I can get on board with that B)
Last edit: 25 Apr 2016 20:47 by .

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Apr 2016 20:35 - 25 Apr 2016 20:36 #239162 by Kit

Br. John wrote: ...It's very generic and there are even Humanist Chaplains ...


There are no military Humanist Chaplains. :angry: (something I'm upset about)

Is Chaplain used outside the military though?
Last edit: 25 Apr 2016 20:36 by Kit.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Apr 2016 21:13 #239175 by Breeze el Tierno
Chaplains serve in hospitals as well.

I don't hate Chaplain.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Kit,

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
25 Apr 2016 22:18 #239192 by
Talking to some members of the temple, I came to the conclusion that we should not get terms of other religions; then either we have to choose very general terms or create others. I believe that there are already enough people thinking about it and I'm already a lot of work, without much time to think about it. So as soon as I have any idea I post here. Still I would like to make another observation.
I think the new names should not have things like colors, white monk, white priest, white mage etc. (I know many would like white or gray wizard XD); this can cause confusion, causing people to think we just have a good side. We know this is not true.
Another thing, we avoid grandiose terms, in great pomp. We have to be humble people, nothing to be looking for honors and glories, would be a very stupid move in my opinion. Not that anyone has done it, but only advice.
I have an idea here that such:

Lissensed Minister => Minister
Deacon => Mentor
Priest => Monk
Bishop => Senior monk
"I monk a neutral term"

If they do not like it, fine, but just came to mind.
Another idea would be to create an ending to identify degrees, but without titles, as in Japanese for pronouns: Sam, Sempai, Sama etc. May only appear as a minister and just make markings to identify the degrees.
I say this because I think that within a religion, people seek titles for self glorification. It would be great if we could dodge it, it's just a change of names, not functions and structures, so in my opinion is a matter of small weight and I could abolish all titles in the end it only serve to know the function each and study time.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
25 Apr 2016 23:11 #239197 by

Br. John wrote: Here's a scheme I've been thinking about.

Licensed Minister - Licensed Minister
Deacon - Ordained Minister
Priest - Senior Minister
Bishop - Chaplain


I'm not in the clergy but am hoping to be someday. I Br. John's above suggestion the best of those that have been made so far.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
26 Apr 2016 00:45 #239209 by Manu
If the idea is to get rid of the connotations of the current clerical ranks without applying new negative connotations to new clerical ranks, why not get rid of the ranks altogether?

You could have:

Seminarian ---> Seminarian
Licensed Minister ---> Licensed Minister

And then simply list on the left bar under the user's picture whether they hold a "A. Div", "B. Div", etc.

No need to overcomplicate things.

The pessimist complains about the wind;
The optimist expects it to change;
The realist adjusts the sails.
- William Arthur Ward

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
26 Apr 2016 00:48 #239210 by

Manu wrote:
And then simply list on the left bar under the user's picture whether they hold a "A. Div", "B. Div", etc.


I'm sensing a theme of confusion on this point. The degree scheme is separate from the Clergy, almost entirely.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
26 Apr 2016 00:57 #239212 by Manu

Jamie Stick wrote:

Manu wrote:
And then simply list on the left bar under the user's picture whether they hold a "A. Div", "B. Div", etc.


I'm sensing a theme of confusion on this point. The degree scheme is separate from the Clergy, almost entirely.


You are probably right :)

I'll shut up now.

The pessimist complains about the wind;
The optimist expects it to change;
The realist adjusts the sails.
- William Arthur Ward

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
26 Apr 2016 02:05 #239222 by

Br. John wrote: Here's a scheme I've been thinking about.

Licensed Minister - Licensed Minister
Deacon - Ordained Minister
Priest - Senior Minister
Bishop - Chaplain

There are also the excellent generic terms Celebrant and Officiant (which are easily combined or interchanged with Minister whenever needed to avoid confusion).

All are still 'Ministers' and would state as such for any government license etc.

Pastor - President of the Clergy
Vice Pastor - Vice President of the Clergy

And yes organizations can have more than one President. For some time I've thought Jestor should be President of Member Affairs, The Pastor should be President of Clerical Affairs and I'd change from President to President of Governmental and Legal Affairs. That's another subject of course - but we can have co-presidents.


If this was a voting thing, I would vote for this

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
26 Apr 2016 02:19 #239223 by MadHatter

Rick D wrote:

Br. John wrote: Here's a scheme I've been thinking about.

Licensed Minister - Licensed Minister
Deacon - Ordained Minister
Priest - Senior Minister
Bishop - Chaplain

There are also the excellent generic terms Celebrant and Officiant (which are easily combined or interchanged with Minister whenever needed to avoid confusion).

All are still 'Ministers' and would state as such for any government license etc.

Pastor - President of the Clergy
Vice Pastor - Vice President of the Clergy

And yes organizations can have more than one President. For some time I've thought Jestor should be President of Member Affairs, The Pastor should be President of Clerical Affairs and I'd change from President to President of Governmental and Legal Affairs. That's another subject of course - but we can have co-presidents.


If this was a voting thing, I would vote for this


I second that for sure.

Knight of the Order
Training Master: Jestor
Apprentices: Lama Su, Leah
Just a pop culture Jedi doing what I can
The following user(s) said Thank You:

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
26 Apr 2016 03:12 #239226 by
I third John's suggestion.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • User
  • User
More
26 Apr 2016 07:30 - 26 Apr 2016 07:30 #239246 by

MadHatter wrote:

Rick D wrote:

Br. John wrote: Here's a scheme I've been thinking about.

Licensed Minister - Licensed Minister
Deacon - Ordained Minister
Priest - Senior Minister
Bishop - Chaplain

There are also the excellent generic terms Celebrant and Officiant (which are easily combined or interchanged with Minister whenever needed to avoid confusion).

All are still 'Ministers' and would state as such for any government license etc.

Pastor - President of the Clergy
Vice Pastor - Vice President of the Clergy

And yes organizations can have more than one President. For some time I've thought Jestor should be President of Member Affairs, The Pastor should be President of Clerical Affairs and I'd change from President to President of Governmental and Legal Affairs. That's another subject of course - but we can have co-presidents.


If this was a voting thing, I would vote for this


I second that for sure.


Me too ..or is it fourth :laugh:
Last edit: 26 Apr 2016 07:30 by .

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
26 Apr 2016 08:46 #239251 by Loudzoo
As very much a 'lay' member of the Temple I appreciate the opportunity to witness this discussion. Br. John's suggestion is probably the least provocative and I would have no problem if that became the new format. At the same time it is also a little too functional . . . 'dry' if you like . . . for my tastes, at least.

It makes sense to have 'Licensed Minister' remain the basic clergy rank for all the reasons already stated: legal, and outside TOTJO recognition. Could we not have a little more fun with the more senior titles though? All senior titles would by definition also be Licensed Ministers for legal purposes.

It's not my place to say but here are some alternative titles to throw into the ring:

Licensed Minister - Licensed Minister
Cleric - Ordained Minister / Deacon
Prior - Senior Minister / Priest
Paladin - Bishop
Vice-Chaplain - Vice-Pastor
Chaplain - Pastor

Love the sound of Paladin ;)

The Librarian
Knight of TOTJO: Initiate Journal , Apprentice Journal , Knight Journal , Loudzoo's Scrapbook
TM: Proteus
Knighted Apprentices: Tellahane , Skryym
Apprentices: Squint , REBender
Master's Thesis: The Jedi Book of Life
If peace cannot be maintained with honour, it is no longer peace . . .
The following user(s) said Thank You:

Please Log in to join the conversation.