- Posts: 4559
FAQ and Article Updates
http://www.templeofthejediorder.org/faq
The majority of updates are grammatical and spelling errors and formatting has been done to the majority of the document. This is in addition to some new questions that have been added and some questions already in the FAQ have been expanded upon
If you have any questions regarding specific changes then please ask your questions here
My work on the FAQ is an on going project and as such the FAQ is subject to update without prior notice. However an announcement will be made as a reply to this thread if there are any further changes
A full changelog is available from me via request (email)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
If you have any questions (or suggestions) please either post here or PM myself
As I have said before any further changes will be implemented without prior notification however an announcement will be made should there be any updates
Aside from grammatical, formatting and spelling fixes the following content based changes have been implemented and are effective as of now:
Added the phrase:
We do not allow members under the age of 13 to formally join the Order. This means that a Simple Oath and Jedi Application by people who are under the age of 13 will count as being invalid
To FAQ 3, 4 and 5
There is no appeal system called Br.John except in the most rare of occasions.
Br.John is outside of the Council for legal reasons - he is neither answerable to the Council, nor is he 'boss' over the Council. The Senior Temple Security Officer is a part of The Council - but is unbiased in all cases.
If the complaint is against a member of The Council or the Senior Temple Officer - then Br.John takes their place on The Council for the duration of the investigation etc of the case.
This was removed because it was incorrect. Br John is not above the council and is answerable to the council (out-dated from long time ago)
Added that only Knights and higher can take apprentices on FAQ 9
The FAQ I added was a new number 7 (7. I've filled out the Simple Oath and Jedi Application. Why hasn't my rank changed?)
All references to 'teaching Master' have been replaced with 'Training Master'
Added 'Back to top' button
Changed numbering from roman numerals to standard (English language) numbers
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
(link won't work for most people)
That is my new version of FAQ 3
If you can think of any changes that you want made then please do suggest them

Can you point out specifics of what is missing to be sure I don't miss anything
I will be submitting a newer-new update soon (few weeks) which should revamp (clarify and make longer

I'm always open for suggestions
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Posts: 14625
Lol, I just typed this up two days ago...
*3. I am under 18 years of age, can I still become a member?*
We do not allow members under the age of 13 to formally join the Order. This means that a Simple Oath and Jedi Application by people who are under the age of 13 will count as being invalid and the application will be deleted.
However, you may become a youth Member of the Order if you are between the ages of 13 and 18. Being a youth Member is no different in any regards from being an adult Member. We just have a different way of having you join.
Please contact the Youth Officer(s) as listed in the F.A.Q., as listed in section #18, for further instructions. In some cases we may ask to double check with your parent(s) or guardian(s), so that they are aware, and happy, with your membership of our Order.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
http://www.templeofthejediorder.org/faq
The changes are... many...
There may still be some inconsistencies which might include but not limited to: wrong reference numbers (i.e. it says see FaQ 13 when it should be 14 etc), incorrect hyperlinks, spelling and grammatical errors etc
If you have any questions or propose changes then please PM me to keep this thread clear
EDIT: In addition to these changes links that use to link in will no longer be functioning. Old references to FaQs may also be incorrect as some new FaQs have been added and 'shifted' some of them up or down
Please report and instances of this to myself
Please Log in to join the conversation.