A Problem.
-
- User
-
Adder wrote:
... sure I get what your saying, but who says what is right and wrong? Why would people feel unable or ashamed to talk about their Jedi values in public, or at a Jedi Temple!!!!!??? Simply don't judge the other person and then its up to them if they think it needs to be improved or not. If questioning leads to conflict, then I'd suggest it's being done wrong.
I think that's part of the point. We're trying to get away from that. If I don't like something you said or did, I'll tell you and I'll tell you why. This allows you and others to engage in a dialogue.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
-
- User
-
That doesn't seem very Jedi?
The ? makes a big difference. It makes it an question not an attack. Granted a provocative question to stimulating discussion . Any follow up would be an opportunity for both to learn more and maybe understand each other better.
Perhaps it should be read as a question and given the intention of curiosity.... that doesnt seem very Jedi <curious question>? From that we could assert that the concept of Jedi is the individual view of the person asking, and not necessarily a judgmental accusation or challenge. Then the answer can be of explanatory nature about the answering persons view..... and if by chance that mindfulness reveals the answerer agrees it does not match their own view of Jedi, then its win-win; the questioner learns something about the other person and the answerer learns something about themselves.
In which case it would not longer be a logical fallacy, and the conceptualization of Jedi remains a personal idealization for self improvement etc, in an environment of shared goals and community participation.
Without the ? it's a statement of expectation when you believe someone is better than they are acting. Is that so bad?
Ya never know learning could take place.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Alethea Thompson
-
- Offline
- User
-
- Posts: 2291
I'll tell someone they aren't acting as a Jedi if they decide to blatantly violate a viable law (example- waterboarding). It tends to be in the extremes though.
Gather at the River,
Setanaoko Oceana
Please Log in to join the conversation.
-
- User
-
Rickie The Grey wrote:
Without the ? it's a statement of expectation when you believe someone is better than they are acting. Is that so bad?
The problem is not one of tone, but rather one of implicit assumptions. The statement (or question) assumes a common understanding of what it means to be a Jedi and that just isn't the case, not here nor in the fictional Star Wars universe.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Alethea Thompson wrote: Depends on the situation.
I'll tell someone they aren't acting as a Jedi if they decide to blatantly violate a viable law (example- waterboarding). It tends to be in the extremes though.
Can you, though? I mean, the Jedi community IRL has generally decided that society's laws are the ones we should follow, but we're also a very individualistic group. And in the fiction, the Jedi made their own laws and answered to nobody but themsleves and the Council. So, in an event where a thousand, a hundred thousand, a million, a billion lives could be saved by violating a law like that, isn't that still kind of a Jedi thing to do?
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Jamie Stick wrote: The problem is not one of tone, but rather one of implicit assumptions. The statement (or question) assumes a common understanding of what it means to be a Jedi ....
I could ask that since no common understanding exists (as you point out), then it would be erroneous to make that particular assumption to begin with? So what other options are there, because lets be honest - not every question needs to be answered!!
:lol:
Some questions should be outright ignored LOL
But some questions can be interpreted in slightly different ways to avoid taking offense, and instead see it as useful/opportunity. That is what I was getting at earlier anyway.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Alethea Thompson
-
- Offline
- User
-
- Posts: 2291
What I've seen of abusive interrogation techniques, on the other hand, produces ill information. You tend to get misinformation because people just want things to stop- so they'll say anything, even just what you want to hear.
So yeah, I can say it, and I will- based on experience with those specific types of laws.
Gather at the River,
Setanaoko Oceana
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Alethea Thompson wrote: So yeah, I can say it, and I will- based on experience with those specific types of laws.
And I will continue to disagree with you for my own, personal reasons.
You're free to say anybody you want is "unJedi." But don't expect everyone to agree with your statements, and understand that they undermine the very "Jedi" nature (by their very existence) that you're trying to get people to strive for.
In comparing someone to a ruler that doesn't exist, we are doing the opposite of what is taught here. We are actively harming the community by passing judgement in what should be a judgement-free space. And no amount of sugar-coating is going to make it alright.
A.Div
IP | Apprentice | Seminary | Degree
AMA | Vlog | Meditation
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- SilverWolf
-
- Offline
- Banned
-
- Posts: 140
Now with that being said, the original issue from what I understand, was someone questioned what someone had said or done and questioned if it was "not very jedi-like". That made me ask the Question: What does it mean to act like a jedi? We all have different opinions and beliefs of what being a Jedi means to us. Some of us agree with our opinions and beliefs, and some of us disagree entirely, or only agree on "certain points". This made me look up "The Jedi code" as it relates to the fictional Star Wars Universe in the Books, this is what I found: Grand Master Luke Skywalker modified this code slightly upon reestablishing the Jedi Order in the Galaxy:
Jedi are the guardians of peace in the galaxy. ( Police Officers, Soldiers, and Clergy men and Women of different faiths and beliefs do this)
Jedi use their powers to defend and to protect. ( police Officers and Soldiers do this)
Jedi respect all life, in any form. ( Clergy men and Women are usually the standard for this one)
Jedi serve others rather than ruling over them, for the good of the galaxy. ( Clergy men and Women do this, and I could be wrong, but I believe some soldiers believe that the best honor is to serve and protect)
Jedi seek to improve themselves through knowledge and training. ( This statement could be talking about Anyone, I currently am going to Ohio Christian University online for my Associates in Business Administration, aside from doing my studies here).
There were more parts of the code:
Miscellaneous tenets
Here can be read a number of miscellaneous tenets which are not mentioned in the Code, but should be known for all Jedi.
The Jedi are the guardians of civilization, yet do not allow civilization to destroy needlessly.
A Jedi uses the Force for knowledge and defense, never for aggression or personal gain.
A corollary of the Code was "A Jedi does not act for personal power."
The lightsaber is the symbol of the members of the Jedi Order.
If a Jedi ignites his lightsaber, he must be ready to take a life.[3]
Jedi do not marry (with some exceptions), in order to avoid attachment and—according to Vergere—so as not to create dynasties of those strong in the Force. However, in many periods of the Order's history, such as the era prior to Exar Kun and in Luke Skywalker's reformed Jedi Order, marriage was not forbidden. That being said, celibacy was enforced in many periods of the Order's history.
Jedi respect each other, and all other life forms.
Jedi must put the needs of the community above the needs of individuals.
A Jedi must protect the weak and defenseless from evil.
Jedi must always cooperate in battle or crisis.
Jedi must not have wants; self-reliance must be shown.
Jedi are forbidden from ruling others, although by the end of the Republic there was some debate over whether or not this was part of the actual Code.
A Jedi Master may not have more than one Padawan. This particular rule developed after the Old Sith Wars, as most ancient Masters such as Arca Jeth, Thon, Vodo-Siosk Baas and Krynda Draay did not have to abide by it. Meetra Surik also trained many apprentices at the same time due to their Force-sensitivity and the galaxy's dire need for Jedi. However, one apprentice per master seemed to be the standard around 32 BBY. But due to the lack of Masters in Luke Skywalker's Academy, several Padawans per master was necessary, as seen in Jaden Korr and Rosh Penin training under Kyle Katarn.
While the Code did not mention a maximum age for taking Padawans, Jedi Master Simikarty wrote influential interpretations of the Code that inserted such limits; over time, his interpretations of the Code became conflated with the Code itself. In Revan's era, apprentices were taken from early childhood. After the end of the New Sith Wars, it became policy to take apprentices from infancy, which proved controversial with those outside the Order. Conversely, Nomi Sunrider started her training as an adult, as did the apprentices of the Jedi Exile and many of the New Jedi Order.
A Jedi will not kill an unarmed opponent, such as the way Anakin Skywalker executed Count Dooku.
A Jedi will not take revenge, such as Anakin did against the Tusken Raiders
A Jedi does not cling to the past, such as Anakin did when he used bad memories like when Padmé was almost assassinated to keep his resolve to defeat Nute Gunray and the Confederacy of Independent Systems
The Jedi do not believe in killing their prisoners.
Following the code
"The Jedi shackle themselves in chains of obedience: obedience to the Jedi Council; obedience to their Masters; obedience to the Republic. Those who follow the light side even believe they must submit themselves to the Force. They are merely instruments of its will, slaves to a greater good."
―Darth Bane, comparing the Jedi Code to the Sith Code[src]
Self-discipline
Self-discipline was one of the key concepts of Jedi behavior, and Jedi Padawans were taught this from a very early age. The lessons started off similar to what might be taught to an ordinary student; however, as the student progressed, so did the complexity of the lessons.[4]
Conquer Arrogance
"The acceptance of others is not a guarantee. Like everyone else, a Jedi is accepted or not based on his behavior. The Jedi who believes that he is more important than others only demonstrates that his opinion is to be ignored."
―Dooku[src]
Jedi were required to learn that, although they were able to use the Force, they were no better than those who could not. Jedi were taught that they were only Jedi because some had taken the trouble to teach them, not because they were superior to others, and that a Jedi Master was only a Jedi Master because he had disregarded his own sense of self-importance and embraced the will of the Force.[4]
Conquer Overconfidence
"Overconfident thinking is flawed because the Jedi does not take all possibilities into account. He may understand the task at hand, the support of his fellows, and the ramifications of his success, and he may have even planned for unanticipated factors—but he has failed to understand his own capabilities. He has planned only for success, because he has concluded that there can be no failure. Every Jedi, in every task, should prepare for the possibility of failure."
―Vodo-Siosk Baas[src]
Many young Jedi students, while learning the ways of the Force, began to believe that they could accomplish anything. Many young Jedi died taking on tasks that were far too difficult for them, not realizing that the Force was only truly limitless to those who had limitless understanding.[4]
Conquer Defeatism
"Try not! Do, or do not. There is no try."
―Yoda — Gnome-speakernotesListen (file info)[src]
Young Jedi also learned that defeatism was just as dangerous as overconfidence. Although it might have seemed contradictory to the goals of conquering overconfidence, a Jedi would first plan for success, then for failure. Jedi who always plan for failure expected to lose, and usually only used minimal effort—enough to say that they had tried.[4]
Conquer Stubbornness
"Do not see a lightsaber duel as a choice between winning and losing. Every duel can have many, many outcomes. When you concentrate solely on winning—in lightsaber duels as in everything else—you sully your victory. Winning becomes worse than losing. It is better to lose than to win sorely. And it is always better to end a duel peacefully than to win or lose"
―Rekpa De[src]
Jedi would always have been ready to accept defeat if the cost of winning was greater than the cost of losing. Jedi were taught that it was always best to end things peacefully than to win or lose.[4]
Conquer Recklessness
"Learn to recognize when speed is not important. Race when being first is important; move at your own pace at all other times. It is not necessary to always strike the first blow, to provide the first solution, or to reach a goal before anyone else does. In fact, it is sometimes vital to strike the last blow, to give the final answer, or to arrive after everyone else."
―Wiwa[src]
Many young Jedi lacking in self-restraint were always ready to ignite their lightsabers and plunge straight into battle. They perceived a goal and rushed towards it, without any consideration for unseen dangers or other options. And so Jedi were taught that speed did not necessarily lead to success.[4]
Conquer Curiosity
"Use the Force to satisfy the will of the Force—not to satisfy your own curiosity."
―Odan-Urr[src]
Many inexperienced Force-sensitives used the Force to satisfy their curiosity, probing into the business of others. Intruding gave the clear message that the Jedi felt they were above others' privacy. Jedi were taught that although using the Force to discreetly uncover the secrets of others may have been occasionally necessary, it should never become a matter of course, as it would cause great distrust of the Jedi in general.[4]
Conquer Aggression
"A Jedi uses the Force for knowledge and defense, never for attack."
―Yoda[src]
A sizable number of Jedi, in training, confused the meanings of attack, defense and aggression. Thus Younglings were taught that it was possible for a Jedi to strike without aggression, so long as they acted without recklessness, hatred or anger. A Jedi was permitted to kill in self-defense—only if there was no other option. However, Jedi instructors taught their students that killing, no matter what the circumstances, was not to become commonplace. To conquer aggression, even in combat, a Jedi must have explored every other option, including surrender, before resorting to using lethal force. Jedi who depended on murder were close to the Dark side of the Force.[4]
Conquer External Loyalties
"A Jedi is a Jedi, first and foremost, and only. For a Jedi to divide his attention between the will of the Force and the will of others is to invite disaster."
―Hoche Trit[src]
Each Jedi was expected to remove as many external distractions from his or her life as possible. For that reason, the Order only accepted potential Padawans while they were still young children; they were too young to have already formed strong relationships and forbidden them forming attached relationships later in life. Jedi were not allowed to marry without special dispensation,[4] like in the case of Cerean Jedi Ki-Adi-Mundi, who was allowed to marry several Cerean women because of his people's low birth rate.[5] Jedi were forbidden from taking a political appointment or to accept gifts. They were taught that their loyalty was to be to the Jedi Order, and to nothing else.[4]
Conquer Materialism
"I wear my robe so that I am warm; I carry my lightsaber so that I am safe; and I keep enough credits for my next meal, so that I am not hungry. If the Force wants me to have more, it finds a way of letting me know."
―Kagoro[src]
Jedi were forbidden from keeping more than a few essential belongings. There were two reasons for this; first because they distracted a Jedi from the Force, and second because, as they emerged through the ranks, Jedi were required to leave for missions with extremely short notice, and so having many objects was a burden. It was rare for a Jedi to possess more than they could carry on their person at one time.[4]
Responsibility
Once a Jedi had mastered self-discipline, they could begin to accept responsibility for their actions. Jedi who shunned responsibility were never trained, and Jedi who embraced it were never denied training.[4]
Practice Honesty
"Let there be truth between your heart and the Force. All else is transitory."
―Surenit Kli'qiy[src]
Honesty was the first responsibility that aspiring Jedi were taught. Jedi were permitted to stretch the truth if the situation required it of them, however this was to be done as sparingly as possible. An honest Jedi was always truthful with himself, his Master, and the Council.[4]
Honor Your Promises
"Deliver more than you promise. The best way to be always certain of this is to deliver much, even when you promise nothing."
―Tho-Mes Drei[src]
Jedi were taught that if they made a promise, they should have always been prepared to keep it, or else to have made amends. Thus, a Jedi should never have make a promise he or she was not certain they could keep. Jedi were encouraged to consult their Master before making a promise.[4]
Honor Your Padawan
"Good call, my young Padawan."
―Obi-Wan Kenobi to his Padawan, Anakin Skywalker[src]
A Jedi Master was required to know that he must treat his Padawan with respect. He should never reprimand his Padawan in public, nor punish his Padawan for disagreeing with him. On the other hand, a Master should praise his Padawan, especially in the presence of others. This built the Padawan's confidence, and strengthened the bond between Master and apprentice.[4]
Honor Your Master
"I'm sorry for my behavior, Master. It’s not my place to disagree with you about the boy. And I am grateful you think I'm ready to take the trials."
―Obi-Wan Kenobi to Qui-Gon Jinn[src]
By the same token, Padawans were expected to show great respect to their Masters, especially in front of others. Padawans were taught never to disagree with their Masters to the point of argument, and that when they were in discussion with others, Padawans should only address their Masters when they had been addressed themselves. This spared the Master having to apologize for his Padawan's behavior.[4]
Honor the Jedi Council
"Now must I keep the word I made when only a Jedi Knight I was—a promotion this is not."
―Master Yoda after being invited to join the Jedi High Council[src]
Although the Jedi High Council was the ultimate authority of the Jedi Order, it was not possible for the High Councilors to be everywhere at once. Therefore, when the Council sent a Jedi on a mission, the Jedi spoke for and was a representative of the Jedi Council. The Council was forced to answer for the Jedi's words and answers, and so the Jedi would have been careful not to put the Council in a difficult position, as to do so would be to show terrible disrespect for the Council.[4]
Honor The Jedi Order
"When a Jedi behaves badly in public, an observer might think, 'If this Jedi is a representative of the whole Order, then plainly no Jedi is worth respect.' On meeting a second Jedi, who behaves better than the first, that same person might think, 'Does this say that half the Jedi are good, and half bad?' On meeting a third Jedi, who behaves as well as the second, the person thinks, 'Was the first Jedi an exception, then?' In this way, only by the good behavior of several Jedi can the public be certain that the poor behavior of one Jedi was unusual. Thus, it takes many Jedi to undo the mistakes of one."
―Odan-Urr[src]
Every action a Jedi made reflected on the Order. Good deeds boosted the Order's reputation, but poor behavior sometimes caused incurable damage. Jedi were taught to remember that each person they met might not have set eyes upon a Jedi before, and that the acts of the particular Jedi that person would influence their perception of the Jedi Order as a whole.[4]
Honor the Law
One of the most important roles of the Jedi was to protect the peace and justice of the Republic, and so no Jedi was above the law. Jedi were expected to follow the law the same as they expected others to. Jedi were permitted to break laws, but only when it was required, and only if they were willing to suffer the consequences…[4]
Honor Life
"Listen to the Force, Cade. A Jedi's first concern is to preserve life."
―Kol Skywalker[src]
Jedi were expected never to commit murder, for any reason. However, if confronted with a life-or-death struggle, a Jedi was permitted to kill to complete their mission. This act was not encouraged, as ending life strengthened the dark side; however, if the act was justified—if it saved others' lives, or if the Jedi was acting on the will of the Force—then the light side was equally strengthened. Jedi were also expected to think of those they had killed, and to think of the suffering caused by their deaths. A Jedi who did not care about his victims was on the path to the dark side.[4]
Public service
Although the Jedi existed to serve the Force, they were funded by the senate because they served the public interest. If Jedi were unable to use the Force, they would continue to serve, because that was their duty. The fact that the Force was real, and that the Jedi were its most prolific and devoted practitioners, only strengthened their resolve to use it for good.[4]
Duty To The Republic
Although the Jedi and the Republic were dissimilar, and the Jedi Order had no authority over the Republic, the Jedi served the Republic, and were expected to uphold its laws and ideals, and to protect its citizens. However, members of the Order held no rank in Republic hierarchy, and only served when asked; at all other times they stepped aside. This strange agreement between the two parties had stood for so long that no one knew how or why it had come about.[4]
Render Aid
Jedi were obliged to help those in need of aid whenever possible, and were expected to be able to prioritize quickly. Jedi were taught that while saving one life was important, saving many lives was even more so. This principle did not mean a Jedi had to abandon other goals in every circumstance, but merely that a Jedi must do his or her best to make sure that they aided those who were most in need of assistance.[4]
Defend The Weak
Similarly, a Jedi was expected to defend the weak from those who oppressed them, ranging from small-scale suffering at the hands of an individual to large-scale enslavement of entire species. However, Jedi were taught to remember that all may not have been as it seemed, and that they should respect other cultures, even if they clashed with a Jedi's moral or ethical code. Jedi were also warned not to act in areas out of their jurisdiction, and to always consider the consequences of their actions.[4]
Provide Support
At times, it was necessary for a Jedi to stand aside and let other people defend the weak, even if the Jedi felt that they could do a superior job. Jedi were taught that they should assist by word or action as required by the situation, offering advice when requested to, warning when necessary, and arguing only when reason failed. Jedi should remember that they wielded the marvelous tool of the Force, and that they should be prepared to use it only for good.[4]
The point of all that I am posting is that a lot of what I posted could be any one of us. Who is to say we AREN'T Jedi? I can only speak for myself when I say that I would do almost all of what I posted from the codes that I posted. I understand that what I posted is from a fictional book universe and we have nothing to do with the movies and or the books, but who says we can't apply some of those same values to our own lives? I'll admit to being and calling myself a jedi. I'm proud of it. Do I get angry? yes. Do I make mistakes? yes. I'm human. We all are forever making mistakes and learning as we go through life and NOBODY is perfect. Am I jedi-like? I do my very best to be, but I realize I am not perfect. I realize I will make mistakes and I will learn from them. I just do my best to live my life with Love, kindness, and honor, the best I know how. And that is all ANY jedi can do.
That's just my personal opinion on the matter. Doesn't make it right or wrong, just an opinion.
May the Force be with us All,
SilverWolf
Please Log in to join the conversation.
SilverWolf wrote: First, I want to say that I do not mean nor intend to offend ANYONE in TOTJO, I like and respect you ALL.
That's quite impossible, as you don't know everyone here, much less myself. I understand the purpose in which it was being used, as an introduction so as not to offend anyone, but starting out the gate saying that you like and respect everyone when you can't possibly do either as you don't know everyone here makes it difficult to believe you, and thus making it all the more difficult to get your point across...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- SilverWolf
-
- Offline
- Banned
-
- Posts: 140
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Alexandre Orion
-
- Offline
- Master
-
- Council Member
-
- Senior Ordained Clergy Person
-
- om mani padme hum
- Posts: 7115
steamboat28 wrote:
Someone wrote: That doesn't seem very Jedi...
This sentence holds us back. This sentence keeps us from being who we should be. And no matter how often it's true, or how overwhelmingly true it is, it is never, ever the right thing to say.
By saying this sentence, you are firstly engaging in the " No True Scotsman " fallacy, which should be enough to stop most rational thinking beings in their tracks. If you don't understand why logical fallacies are a bad thing, we'll get to that in another post at another time.
We're all Jedi here, so saying this wretched statement implies that we're not "real" Jedi or "good" Jedi, which is some arbitrary ridiculousness that we reserve for perfect beings, none of which populate this particular Temple. We are all human. We all make mistakes--some of us more often than others, granted, but none of us are immune. We're all working toward the same goal here, too, so undercutting someone's progress when they slip is, itself, not very "Jedi" if we're going to point that finger.
It also reeks of that "holier-than-thou" crap most of us cite as a contributing factor to leaving other paths behind. If someone "isn't very Jedi", and you're pointing it out, you must be SOOOO much more Jedi than them. Except for that whole humility thing. Right?
Instead of snarkily reminding someone that they aren't "being Jedi", why don't we find constructive ways to suggest that their behavior is not what they are currently striving for?
This is really good ...
Would you consider reprinting this as a sermon ?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
-
- User
-
Even so, within this Temple Order, not everything can be included in a definition of Jedi. There are limits, and the discussion of the definition of Jedi is what makes this Temple Order forum lively and interesting. Nevertheless, questioning another's definition should be asked more sensitively. The suggested syntactical variations on the question "That (whatever 'that' is) doesn't sound Jedi?" shows a somewhat unreflective attitude. The question is neither belligerent nor manipulative, but still one that shows that the questioner is unaware that she/he is projecting her/his image of Jedi onto another with the implication that the other somehow fails to live up to the questioner's standard.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
SilverWolf wrote: You Are correct, I do not know everyone here, as you said; muchless yourself. However, just because I do not know a person does not mean I cannot show them respect or respect their opinions and or beliefs. As you pointed out, I do not know you. However, I respect your opinion as you have given it, as it is your opinion and you are entitled to it. I'm not trying to get people to believe me, i'm just sharing my opinion just like everyone else. I believe that you can respect people you do not know. people do it all the time. I've walked down the street and greeted a stranger and there have been times a stranger has greeted me. even in it's smallest form a greeting is a form of kindness and respect.
I believe you're missing my point Silver, and please do not view my constructive criticism as an attack, quite a few people here can't take constructive criticism.
You stated "like and respect," and that sounds much more than common courtesy like the greeting of a stranger. Technically, I could be anyone, completely opposite from the person I seem to be online in the TOTJO, same goes for the rest of us.
Common respect is fine, but stretching it further than that, usually people who are quick to like others without getting to know them on some significant level are either insincere or gullible, I'm not calling you either BTW. I just want you to think before you post...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
-
- User
-
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- SilverWolf
-
- Offline
- Banned
-
- Posts: 140
I always think before I post. and I did not take your comments as an attack, However the sad fact in my opinion anyways, is that society as a whole has become jaded, cold, sometimes harsh, and untrusting. My beliefs may sound strange to some because the world has changed. There are few of us that still remain that believe or think as I do. The world has become cut-throat and cold. Let me clarify that I am not saying you are that way, I am saying that not many are out there who would show like and respect to a total stranger. I am one of the few who does believe that way. I am a dying breed of person, I hold no ill will to anyone...unless they attack my family...then all bets are off. Like I said in my post before yours and I really am sincere about this I try my best to live my life with Love, kindness, and honor. I strive everyday to uphold what being a jedi means to me. I strive everyday to uphold what the code of Bushido means to me, or the Knights code, or even something as simple as "Do unto others" These "codes", Lessons, whatever you wish to call them run in my blood and I truly believe in them. That may sound like I am crazy or something, but it is who I am. It is who I will be, and I am not ashamed of it. I realize how the world has changed and has become in my opinion a lot more cold and selfish as proven by our government and how they treat us and our service members ( which I will forever support). However, just because everyone else changes does not mean I have to. I will stick with my beliefs and principals and I will continue to live by them and honor them. I will continue to Like and respect everyone as a human being and respect and like them even if our opinions disagree. Zenchi, I took no offense to anything you have said, and I hope you don't take offense to anything I say. Like I said, I'm a dying breed of person, I'm different. But I'm Proud of who I am and what I believe.
Matthew 5:3
"Blessed are the poor in Spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven"
"Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted."
"Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth"
"Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled"
"Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy"
"blessed are the Pure in heart, for they will see God"
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God"
"Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kindom of heaven"
"Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.
Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they were perscuted the prophets who were before you"
Now I am by no means a prophet, I am just a man. But I like to believe that this verse is true and so I treat everyone friend or Stranger the same. I try not to take offense by anything anyone says. I just try to live life and enjoy it, at least until I "become one with the force" That is all any of us can do.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
edit: This is to clarify how I had taken Silver's initial opening.
rugadd
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- SilverWolf
-
- Offline
- Banned
-
- Posts: 140
I guess that would be a fair assessment, I do consider myself an Optimist. I see good in everyone, and I respect or at least try to respect everyones feelings and beliefs. I may or may not agree with everyone, but that doesn't make me right or someone else wrong, it just means we have different beliefs and ways of thinking, and that is ok. I recently read a post where a member was apologizing for something that was said, so I put that original opening in so I could let it be known that I do not wish to offend anyone. However, I was also being honest when I said that I like and respect you all. I do appreciate your comment about what my opening said to you. Thank you.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
-
- User
-
The question is neither belligerent nor manipulative, but still one that shows that the questioner is unaware that she/he is projecting her/his image of Jedi onto another with the implication that the other somehow fails to live up to the questioner's standard
Let me change one word....
That isn't very "nice" of you.
Does that change anything?
Is that an insentive statement or a statement resulting of the questioners sensitivity?
Does nice have to be defined?
Is it projecting my image of nice on another or is nice commonly understood?
Is that an unreflective attitude or a statement of opinion? Both?
If someone doesn't live up to my expectation of nice why shouldn't I be able to state that?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
