Editing Rights Question

I could be wrong, but I believe you've missed the point of Opie's post, John.

That is to say, it wasn't to call to attention whether or not the facts on your site were accurate or not.

Rather, the point of his post was to question the legitimacy of the moderating that was being conducted. That is to stay, instead of enforcing the rules as they're posted on the site (no external links), you instead allowed a personal bias to impact your moderation against a single link. I say personal bias because you have made, and continue to make, your opinion against Jones plainly obvious across this site.

If the issue had been with the links themselves, then the appropriate action would have been to do as MadHatter did, which is to have removed both links entirely. The fact that all you did was change one link from the actual site being referenced to a site of your own creation only enforces the impression that the moderation was done out of a personal bias rather than a legitimate enforcement of the rules of the site, which thus makes the moderation illegitimate.

Such questioning falls into line with current discussion at TOTJO, which is the moderation of posts and when it's done legitimately and illegitimately has been called to question as of late. Sure, Opie called out your action, but that's because it is just the most recent example.

So the real discussion here isn't about the site you redirected the link to, but if the redirection was a legitimate or appropriate form of moderation (it wasn't) and what TOTJO considers a legitimate and appropriate form of moderation.

Just my two cents. I could be wrong.

[hr]
On a bit of a site note, I'd caution not to take Opie's questioning personally, which it seems you have.

I also wonder... Have you considered the fact that your constant actions regarding Jones and his site only help to bring attention to him while conversely delegitimizing your position. That is to say, the more you comment negatively against Jones, the more attention people pay to him and the more you make it look like a personal vendetta. In turn, your actions in instances such as this look illegitimate because you appear to have been acting from a point of personal biases rather than actual legitimate enforcement of community rules.

I know I've commented to you about it in the past regarding other issues, but as the proclaimed president and a member of the council, you have an obligation to consider how your actions reflect upon TOTJO. Meaning, by using an official act (moderation of a post) to push that apparent personal agenda (your dislike of Jones resulting in you changing a link in a post to a site of your own creation), you make it appear as though that that is the official stance TOTJO takes towards the issue. And as has been stated in both the original thread in question, and in multiple other threads about multiple other issues, such an official stance doesn't actually exist

You could have simply said in a separate post "I don't approve of Jones, and this is why (link to your site)" and left it at that (the appropriate course of action). Instead you turned it into an official matter through the use of moderation, and thus this entire conversation began.

Leadership isn't above scrutiny... even from guests

Again, just my two cents. I could be wrong. I'll see my way out now.

It is a fact that a position of responsibility as Br. John's can take its toll with the many complaints he must address all the time. I am sure we can all find the ressources in our hearts to forgive this slip. An apology would go a long way though.

Flojade wrote: It is a fact that a position of responsibility as Br. John's can take its toll with the many complaints he must address all the time. I am sure we can all find the ressources in our hearts to forgive this slip. An apology would go a long way though.

Are you trying to tell people how they should feel (that they should forgive Br John)? Or to tell Br John that its time for an apology? You have as much right as anyone to give your opinion on what you see, but do you believe that you know this situation and these peoople well enough to be qualified to decide who should feel what, and who owes who an apology, to tell other people what they should feel and what they should to do)?

Do you even know what the hell is going on here? Lol

Dont take this personally, please. If youre going to tell people what they should do, how important is it, do you think, to really understand why theyve done what theyve done? Do you understand the history here? Are you engaging with therelevant parties personally to find out why they feel the way they feel and why they act the ways they act?

Getting people to pipe down and play nice is not the same thing as mediating conflict. So, what are you trying to accomplish? Actual resolution, that leaves all parties feelig acknowledged and reinvested in their community, or just to shut people up so they dont express any kinds of feelings that make you uncomfortable?

Br. John wrote:

Opie Macleod wrote: Is it really okay for Br. John to edit people's posts for personal issues at his whim? Is this not a problem for the organization?

I get not liking the Church of Jediism. I do. But going into people's topics and editing the link to his dedicated website of mockery seems an over-reach. Certainly doesn't seem like something a Jedi Site would support? He can claim not to be a Jedi, so having those type of sites to begin with can exist under that banner. But allowing him to edit a person's topic because of that personal distaste? Changing a link because of his own issue. Is that really the image and behavior this place wants to encourage?

To be clear - if the answer is yes, then cool deal. Or some form of yes by inactivity, then cool. I am just trying to discern what level of invasion is allowed here and how it is regulated. If that is - he is the founder so he can do what he wants. Again, cool deal. Just looking to understand what this group allows. Just seemed to me to be an over-reach and not really fall in line with behavior that might be normally encouraged.

I don't go on your site and tell people your issues or criticize the way you do things. That would be rude. Especially if it was an issue that could be resolved with a PM. That would make me an

Warning: Spoiler!

ass. A shit scabbed puckered asshole.

You could have PM'd me and asked about it. You could have PM'd member affairs about it. The only person with a right to complain is the poster. The name of the place was still there. Do you think anyone here is not capable of finding Daniel Jones' for profit business named ]The Church of Jediism? Since you've decided to try and make a public spectacle out of it please continue and really do it right. Have another drink, then kindly tell me any facts I'm wrong about on http://BecomeTheFarce.com and I'll correct them. I'd also like to know how telling the truth about something is mocking something.

Become the Farce? Seriously? This is why the Jedi community will never advance, because the leadership is too busy tearing each other apart rather than growing together.

EDIT: If you put as much work into tearing apart this book as you did training, you'd really be a Grandmaster.

Great good gods, I'm not even sure where to begin or what to say.

I didn't see the original issue, I'm gathering someone posted about another website and one of our mods edited it to link to his libel website?

This is not the kind of etiquette I want to see in this community and I do not support it. Thank you Mad for getting involved. I've put myself on a mini vacation until Tuesday, but couldn't miss seeing this when I went to share some of my crafts and some work I'd promised a while ago.

Anyone can complain about an issue they see. It's what we do to help each other and support each other. It's a part of our Knight's Code "I will defend the helpless" and I'm sure if I went into our Doctrine I could find bits there too that support that. We all have the right to question what we feel might be wrong. Sure there may have been other ways to handle it but I feel Opie did it professionally and not incorrectly.

Folks, please feel free to ask about problems and issues you see. To me, or any other Knight you feel comfortable with talking to if you don't feel comfortable posting on the forums. This is what we need to foster the kind of community I feel like we are trying to grow into. If we're not open to criticism, we won't go anywhere at all.

I would also like to point out that situations like this can be avoided and minimized by the establishment of and respect towards a clear line of duties, responsibilities, and rights to the leadership roles of the site, by all members of leadership and consequences therein...

Maybe something to consider discussing in that whole Pax Templi thing you guys are working on behind the scenes or something similar.