Editing Rights Question

Speaking of moderator abuse, Master Opie, how about the entire site you deleted with no way to recover it? Years of posts and discussions gone. I was correctly moderated here. Our system worked. I'm 57 btw.

Let me begin by saying that I am disappointed that these issues continue to pop up, and I don't think it has been handled as well as it could have been up to this point. It is my duty as a Security Officer and a Knight Adviser to weigh in and attempt to explain in the most transparent manner possible how we are addressing this issue at the Council level, so here goes...

Nakis wrote: End result:

Is the way this was handled by leadership appropriate?

There was a variety of responses and non-responses from various leadership, so I need to be specific. Br. John moderated a post and changed a URL link. This action is not explicitly defined as right or wrong in our site rules, but the various opinions from members and some leadership here show that some deemed this action inappropriate, and we need to address this with the current review of our policies. It must also be pointed out that this action was taken by our President and Founder who has full moderation privileges that he can choose to use at any time.
While the rules still certainly apply to him, it should be noted that as Moderators, we also have to police each other as fairly as possible. This takes courage, good judgment, and regretfully also some political finesse. MadHatter, as a Moderator, Councillor, and VP of Membership Affairs took said action and edited the original post again to be in line with our current policies for posting external links. Kit has expressed her opinion as a Councillor as well, and I commend her for being vocal about the issue quickly.

I am offering my personal response here and now. This is a problem that needs to be addressed. There is additional conversation that is taking place among other Councillors, but until we can address it openly as a group, we will not be able to offer a consensus or official opinion of the Council on this. It is being addressed though, and it will be taken into account as we make adjustments to our policies and create the Pax Templi document addressing acceptable behavior here. According to the way Council is run, we need to have these frank conversations and come to an agreement via vote on policy changes. These conversations can be contentious and heated, which is why we try to keep them out of the otherwise relatively peaceful environment of the Temple.

Nakis wrote: If not, how do we go about fixing it?

It will become a discussion point as we address the current website policies and procedures as well as the expected behavior of members and administration here. Everyone has their own opinions and they all need to be heard before we rush to conclusions. That includes opinions expressed by the membership in the recent poll as well as comments in threads like this one. It is a lot of information to consider.

Nakis wrote: Are there currently things in the works to address the issue already?

Yes, we were already working on revisions to the rules and regulations currently in place. The issue of appropriate moderation has been raised a lot recently, and as a Security Officer I take this issue very seriously. We want to get it right when moderating, and we're trying to create more fair and more clear guidelines for all moderators of the site.

Nakis wrote: What can be done until such things are released to advance the goals of community building?

First, discussions like this are helpful to Councillors as we attempt to address these recurring issues. I appreciate the attempts by all here to keep this conversation polite and constructive. Please continue to do so, and if you find yourself getting angry or emotional, please take a moment to collect your thoughts before responding. Together, we are all seeking a place that is engaging and challenging, but also fair and compassionate. It is a difficult tight rope to walk at times, but please know that it is always our goal to make this Temple a place people can enjoy spending their valuable time in.

As part of my responsibility to you all as guests, members, and fellow officers, I encourage any of you to PM me with your concerns or post your questions in response to any post I make in the forums. Sometimes conversations are better held in the privacy of PMs, but I also understand the need to inform everyone of what we are actually doing to address issues like this as they happen. I will always do my best to be honest and forthcoming with the information I have available to me.

At your service,
~Senan

I think threads like this show me some of my faults because I find them very entertaining. Especially how despite the best of original intent, and attempt to hold that intent, it always comes down to degrading other Jedi and a contest of who is the better Jedi and who is more "mature" or not etc etc.

It actually reminds me most of the episode of the "orville" recently where they visit an un-developed planet and everyone has these badges they wear. These badges have an up arrow and a down arrow, and anyone can click these arrows but yourself. So if you do a good deed and someone notices they can bump your arrow up and this improves your reputation. If you do something rude or mean they hit the down arrow and you loose this score. You can also get someones ID number and do it remotely over a phone app too so if something ends up in the news on TV as it did in this episode, millions of people can down vote you. Once you get to like negative 8 million or something you end up on a tv show with a chance to give your story and seek forgiveness and whatnot but if during the final vote phase you hit negative 10 million you get "reconditioned" which is something similar to shock therapy until you are not yourself anymore kinda thing.

The original issue is on the moderation itself, of which has been said multiple times in the last couple weeks in a few different threads a clear cut set of rules of conduct and also relating to moderation is being developed and the first drafts are actually done, hatter has done to my understanding an amazing job on it but also had some helpers, and it is currently under review of quite a few other members of various rank as well and when its agreed upon will get posted accordingly, until then it's not so clear cut and is still up to the interpretation of anyone who has moderation rights.

That being said EVERY moderation action CAN be reviewed, and as it has been said quite a few times as well those requests are done via formerly Private Message to any of the moderators or a Councillor. This act has NOT to my knowledge been done other then the creation of this public thread which is not the way it should have been done. Once this request is made a thread goes up in a private area of the forum with a copy paste of the requests, a link to the thread where the moderation took place any evidence of such and discussion starts then. It also usually filters over to the council chat which is connected to every council members phone so we are all very quick to be notified and begin discussing etc, which is a new improvement on things and pretty impressive. (We had a moderation request come in the other day and within about 15 minutes of that request a majority of the council was involved in discussion of it which was very impressive to me).

The request once reviewed is decided upon, in some cases reversed, in some cases reinforced, but more importantly learned from, grown from, evolved from, much like all of our experiences and lessons in our lives and our training wherever that may be. No one individual is infallible, here or anywhere else. So the whole Jedi maturity, lets loosely walk around who is holier then thou pissing contest that happens under the table and guise of a legitimate question and strive to look out for the "underdogs" and the "Jedi everywhere", or try and appear to be the "savior" can stop now...I vaguely remember a saying from someone that stated there wouldn't be any drama or problems if everyone would "Be a Jedi".

I feel like too many people worry about how their actions "look" and less on what are the appropriate actions period. A Jedi does not seek fame, does not seek glory, does not seek gratitude, does not seek to instill chaos. Your request Opie is totally legitimate, and is important to how you post I'm in full agreement, that's not even in debate. But I feel there are better ways to have done that then what has transpired. However its here, its done, lets ALL learn, grow, move forward shall we?

All that being said I will start the formal request for review on this point and we will proceed from there. In regards to the editing rights original question, the rules will be made more clear and more obvious here in the near future when those are done being revised and reviewed and made sure we have had plenty of different perspectives on it so that we have met the best interest of our community as well, and to be patient as a lot of big steps are going on at the council level and improvements to the training programs and a ton of other things that are in work and progress which like all things, takes time.

Flojade wrote: Sometimes people that have no knowledge the history can have a more objective perspective Ob1.

The objectivity that comes with being ignorant does not make up for the ignorance.

Knowing the specifics is not necessarily compulsory as all human conflicts emanate from the same patterns.

Knowing the specifics IS compulsory. In what domain of activity is it true that you can fix problems which you do not understand?

This might look reasonable to you if you are totally ignorant of the history. If you understand the history, this moment is Trump being absolutely ridiculous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTwmvi-6muA

Speaking of moderator abuse, Master Opie, how about the entire site you deleted with no way to recover it? Years of posts and discussions gone.

1.) There was a way to recover it actually. Ez-Board had a feature for Gold Boards at the time which backed-up forums and allowed you to restore everything with a click of a button. The fact that those in-charge chose not to disclose that information and instead played the 'Oh No! Everything is lost for good!!" angle is something they have to live with. So you know - Ignorance, yet Knowledge and all that. Might want to seek the whole story before assuming.
2.) In 2001 when this happened I was held accountable publicly and didn't earn back Administrator abilities for another four years. Action, Consequence. I have never hide from it. Never buried it. Never run from it. In fact it is a part of the training program at my site. So not sure your point? What that I know well the importance of Accountability of those in-charge? Indeed. I have been on all sides.

I was correctly moderated here. Our system worked.

lol Yes. After something was said. True.

strive to look out for the "underdogs" and the "Jedi everywhere"

It speaks volumes of a place that this is considered a tactic or guise. It astounds me the hypocrisy taking place in this reply alone. I had 100% forgotten the culture here. But You are absolutely right. Moving Forward. Moving On. Focus on what is important. 0123456789

OB1Shinobi wrote:

Flojade wrote: Sometimes people that have no knowledge the history can have a more objective perspective Ob1.

The objectivity that comes with being ignorant does not make up for the ignorance.

Knowing the specifics is not necessarily compulsory as all human conflicts emanate from the same patterns.

Knowing the specifics IS compulsory. In what domain of activity is it true that you can fix problems which you do not understand?

This might look reasonable to you if you are totally ignorant of the history. If you understand the history, this moment is Trump being absolutely ridiculous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTwmvi-6muA

Should his efforts be frowned upon because he's not "in the know" I don't think so, if anything it's a chance for everyone to cool heels and reflect before making a further ass out of themselves. Not only that, you having to remind him how he doesn't quite get it is derailing this thread, let's keep the topic on point peeps....