- Posts: 914
Changes to Login and User Dashboard
We are testing a change on the front page where Community Builder will start taking over the user dashboard and activity feed instead of EasySocial. EasySocial has been giving us some compatibility issues after the upgrade, so this is part of making the site more stable going forward.
Revenge
So what do you think? Is there a point where vengeance is warranted? Is vengeance different from revenge and are both different from justice? How do you think this sort of action could be justified - and do you believe that there is potential for harm because of this sort of action? I'd love to see a discussion of this topic using the article, the source for the article, and any other solid sources you feel like looking up an reviewing hat are available pout there. Opinion pieces are great, but it's always nice to see discussions forming around evidence-based inquiry as well. (i.e. let's see if we can meld our emotional world with legitimate studies into this topic).
We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile, and nothing can grow there. Too much, the best of us is washed away. -- J. Michael Straczynski, Babylon 5
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- OB1Shinobi
-
- Offline
- Banned
-
- Posts: 4394
the idea here being (as it was with moses) that there should be an authority responsible for overseeing punishment, rather than each person who feels that they have been wronged taking revenge according to their own judgement
afaik that is the standard distinction between formal justice and personal revenge
we ALSO have an abstract idea of "justice" as a sort of "standard of fairness" where we would say "the punishment should fit the crime"
and according to this abstract standard, sometimes we feel that some particular person "gets off easy", or that the system really "throws the book at them" and we can say "justice wasnt served"
but the justice system is about predetermined punishments for common crimes, and determining appropriate punishments in new situations, under the administration of official bodies, with he hope or intention of being fair, but if it ever comes to a choice between "fair" and "official" the emphasis will always go to "official"
one of the more interesting aspects of the question to me is: in the absence of a FAIR authority, when the authority is reliably partial, is personal revenge justifiable?"
this isnt just an issue of "if the judge let this one go can I kill him myself?" but rather "if most of the judges in the land let most of the criminals go, can I take justice into my own hands?"
personally, i believe YES because i believe that when the ruling system reaches a certain threshold of corruption then it can no longer be counted on at all to rule - its only going to promote further injustice
but theres also a valid argument for conforming to a corrupt system as well - as long as a system exists there is hope that it may be changed
the more you disrupt the system, even if it is corrupt, the harsher the system is going to become in its efforts to maintain order
and when a corrupt system deliberately increases the severity of its enforcement and punishment policies, it invariably increases the level of injustice
so by acting outside of the system, a claimant may likely contribute to the further deterioration of the system and thus be responsible for increasing the injustice of the land
but of course that's no consolation to the one who isnt seeing justice done in on their behalf to begin with
People are complicated.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
-
- User
-
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" and, from the end of the 2006 Punisher movie, "This is not vengeance. Vengeance is an emotional response. This is punishment." The key to that last part is that vengeance is emotional, punishment must not be. Now Frank Castle may not be the best role model when it comes to Jedi views on vengeance :laugh: but I do love that quote.
I do not believe that vengeance, the emotional response, is ever a good thing. I believe that punishment is. But that's why the victim's families don't serve on juries or make final rulings on sentencing. The legal system is supposed to be impartial.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Carlos.Martinez3
-
- Offline
- Master
-
- Council Member
-
- Senior Ordained Clergy Person
-
- Posts: 8036
You tell a apple tree by its apples
...We are often seen by our actions, and in such by controlling our intent and actions we are seen by the control and intent we display rather than the " our feelings"... The Human potential some times is the act of not acting.
Chaplain of the Temple of the Jedi Order
Build, not tear down.
Nosce te ipsum / Cerca trova
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- OB1Shinobi
-
- Offline
- Banned
-
- Posts: 4394
http://www.concordia.ca/cunews/main/releases/2011/08/09/can-blaming-others-make-people-sick.html
in general there is also a nearly endless amount of anecdotal evidence that feeding and regularly returning to a state of resentment leads to all kinds of problems in life, from direct health issues associated with elevated stress levels primarily to strained social relations at every level - its hard to be loving when youre bitter and people in general dont find it appealing to get close to someone who is down and angry all of the time
here is an article from Berkley on forgiveness
http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/the_science_of_forgiveness_an_annotated_bibliography
some highlights from each
Concordia:
Bitterness as a medical disorder?
It is one thing to suggest that bitterness may cause sickness, quite another to propose that it be recognized as a mental illness. Such is the proposal that was first made by Michael Linden, head of the psychiatric clinic at Free University of Berlin in 2003.
Linden argues that bitterness is actually a medical disorder and should be categorized as post-traumatic embitterment disorder (PTED). He estimates that between one and two per cent of the population is embittered and by giving the condition a proper name, people with PTED will receive the therapeutic attention they deserve.
The jury is still out on this proposal. Wrosch and Renaud say bitterness can be avoided, if people who experience failure can find other ways to fulfil their goals. If they can't, the researchers stress, it’s essential to disengage from the fruitless effort (e.g., to get promoted, to save a marriage) and reengage in something that’s equally meaningful (e.g., a new job or passion).
Called self-regulation processes, disengaging and reengaging can be necessary for a person to avoid bitter emotions. “Any effective therapeutic intervention,” says Renaud, “hinges on the affected individual finding ways to self-regulate.”
In some cases, overcoming bitterness demands more than self-regulation. When bitterness arises from blaming other people, then recovery may involve others. "In order to deal with bitter emotions there may need to be something else required to enable a person to overcome the negative emotion — that something is forgiveness," says Wrosch.
Berkley:
What is forgiveness?
Although we all feel we intuitively know what forgiveness is, it has proven to be a theoretical challenge to define it. Consider the following questions.
Is forgiveness an emotion? Is forgiveness a behavior?
Imagine your friend emails you to apologize for forgetting your birthday but you still feel angry with him. Nevertheless, you don't want to make too big a deal out of it, so you immediately hit the reply button and say, "I forgive you." Has forgiveness occurred?
Researchers Julie Juola Exline and Roy Baumeister have proposed that forgiveness has both internal (emotional) and external (behavioral) elements. Sometimes, we might choose to tell people we forgive them, even if we are still angry inside. Or, we might not be angry anymore, but we might not want to tell the offending person this so they don't think they have a license to walk all over us. Which of these is forgiveness? Exline and Baumeister do not seem to prefer the private aspects over the public aspects, but merely point out that forgiveness can involve one or both. However, little research has been done on this interesting and important distinction between private and public forgiveness.
The Berkley article especially was really worth reading if you have a few minutes
People are complicated.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
-
- User
-
-
- User
-
Attachment h1b7e04a.jpg not found
I took these notes from Chapter 4 of The Wisdom of Forgiveness by the Dalai Lama and Victor Chan:
The Dalai Lama meets Desmond Tutu. They appear to be nearly twin souls, capable of having fun and laughing about the most mundane things almost instantly. I know almost nothing about Apartheid in South Africa, and the stories are horrific... yet Desmond Tutu, who has had to confront it, can face life with optimism. He says that in order to heal, he had to forgive the perpetrators. Forgiveness is not cheap and reconciliation is not easy. By learning to forgive, we open the door a little wider to letting ourselves and others break loose from the past and into a new future.
Ubunt: when I want to praise you, the highest praise I can give you is to say you have "ubuntu". "This person has what it takes to be a human being. This is a person who recognizes that he exists only because others exist. A person is a person through other persons." When we say you have "ubuntu", we mean you are gentle, you are compassionate. "My humanity is caught up in your humanity. When I dehumanize others, I dehumanize myself. We can only be human, we can only be free, together."
In prison a monk named Tenzin realized that being consumed by hatred, by focusing on revenge for his Chinese captors and torturers, he would drive himself insane. They could hurt him physically, but they couldn't take his mental health. The only way he could suffer psychologically was through his own attitude. So he learned to forgive them and learned to feel compassion for them.
Learning to forgive your enemies is spiritual progress. To reduce hatred and other destructive emotions, you must develop their opposites: compassion and kindness.
Revenge does nothing but drive us further apart and breed more hatred and revenge (what else is going to happen besides them trying to return the favor?) and teaches nothing. Empathy heals. Those people who angrily hurt you are already damaging their humanity enough by lashing out at you... helping them heal is so much better for you and them.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
-
- User
-
-
- User
-
Streen wrote: Instead of being philosophical, I'd like to hear from people who have been seriously wronged and managed to forgive the people who have hurt them. Explain to me how you've turned your pain into peace.
You'll have to read my journal (somewhere around Lesson
And I can be philosophical about it because I've lived it. It's the only reason I feel I have any right to talk about it at all.
I imagine anyone here being able to say the same. We've all been wronged, it's part the experience of being human. It's what we do with it that matters.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
-
- User
-
I dont really believe in revenge ...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Wescli Wardest
-
- Offline
- Knight
-
- Unity in all Things
- Posts: 6460
Revenge
To exact punishment or expiation for a wrong on behalf of, especially in a resentful or vindictive spirit:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/revenge
Vengeance
The act of doing something to hurt someone because that person did something that hurt you or someone else
Punishment inflicted in retaliation for an injury or offense
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vengeance
Justice
The process or result of using laws to fairly judge and punish crimes and criminals
Full Definition of justice
1. 1 a : the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments b : judge c : the administration of law; especially : the establishment or determination of rights according to the rules of law or equity
2. 2 a : the quality of being just, impartial, or fair b (1) : the principle or ideal of just dealing or right action (2) : conformity to this principle or ideal : righteousness c : the quality of conforming to law
3. 3 : conformity to truth, fact, or reason : correctness
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/justice
I do not speak for Council, TotJO or Jedi… these are my personal thoughts based on experience, what I have seen and what I know.
In the world of the corporeal...
When someone is reacting to something I’m sure they feel they are being just and fair (the quality of being just, impartial, or fair) dealing right action and conforming to at least their principle or ideal. They conform to their truth and reason at the time.
I have always said that justice is just polite vengeance; or, I have also said that it was no more than more civilized revenge. The real difference, that I see, is that with justice more people are involved and supposedly acting in accordance with a set of rules that are for the benefit of fairness and our wellbeing. But I have seen the Justice system in action and I will tell you that from my experience it is a farce. A mockery of actual justice and fair play, leaving only the stinging sensation of a slap in the face by a wet leather glove.
I believe we need to have a system in place to regulate law and dispense reprisals in an orderly and just manor. But, what we have in place now I sometime wonder if the anarchist have at least some merit to their thinking and that a taste of chaos, or at least rebellion, may cause action to set things in a better direction?
Our current just system is a game where people play with the lives of others to advance their own careers, make political statements or seek federal funding and capitol gains. And has very little to do with actual justice.
Seeking revenge will ultimately hurt you. In the long run, and over time, the events that take place before, during and after will only destroy you and/or worst, those you hold dear. Vengeance can be yours if you are emotionally detached and can come to a resolution that will be viewed as just by others. But, it is always others you have to appease or the reprisals will come back to you. And your actions will be deemed out of line.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Carlos.Martinez3
-
- Offline
- Master
-
- Council Member
-
- Senior Ordained Clergy Person
-
- Posts: 8036
Case in point. I grew up troubled and on the streets. "Squabing" was a word we used for fighting. I fought every one. EVERYONE. Any one who had a thought they could take me. The fights that had more than one person paid more. 3 on one was a good payday, and a sore one some days. At night I would come home and I would get " disciplined" for my action. My step dad found out. For years I took his belt fist and hate, never lifting a hand. He's my dad I would say. Then one day I realized something, um...I'm actually tougher than that. I take 2-3 some times gang fights and I'm cowering to this guy. I stood up. I broke that fear. I had it in me the entire time. This is not to say oh I was abused n mistreated, yes I was yes I have broken that chain. I AM stronger because, I AM. Later in life I got to join the US army and my call sign would for ever be Ares God of War due to me walking out of burning buildings.
I said all that to say this , yes take your time but also remember, you have been doing great things yourself... we never see em as great. Ego and all..but we have been doing great things this entire time. As you read this book be in that "teacher" state of mind, that mind of thought and analyse. You have it present.
Stretch that mind friend. It will result wonderful findings.
Revenge is tough and even tougher to break but it is possible.! I am living proof and will always be thankful for it.
Chaplain of the Temple of the Jedi Order
Build, not tear down.
Nosce te ipsum / Cerca trova
Please Log in to join the conversation.
