Study Material?

Moderators: J_Roz, Desolous, tzb

Study Material? 08 Nov 2011 03:20 #44217

  • Remem
  • Remem's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Novice
  • ID: 8320
Where can I find the study material for Initiates??

Thanks,
Remem

Re: Study Material? 08 Nov 2011 03:43 #44220

  • Jestor
  • Jestor's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Councillor
  • Bishop
  • ID: 3682
If you mean the audios for Joe Campbell and such...

They are in the front page of the site, as well as in the library...

Does that help?
Rite: PureLand
Master: Master Jasper_Ward
Graduated Apprentices: Knight Learn_To_Know, Edan, Knight Brenna, Senior Knight Firewolf
Apprentices: Viskhard, DanWerts, Elizabeth, Llama Su, Trisskar

Life is just a party, and parties weren't made to last..." ~1999 by Prince~

"Questions and answers, sometimes there are no answers and sometimes the answer is yet more questions." ~Elizabeth~

"I don't have any answers, only more questions..." ~me~

Re: Study Material? 08 Nov 2011 05:03 #44222

  • Remem
  • Remem's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Novice
  • ID: 8320
Yes, Thank you

Re: Study Material? 08 Nov 2011 09:49 #44227

You can find everything you need under the "Studies" tab at the top right of the website, next to the "Home" tab and the "My Totjo" tab. There, the initiate's program is outlined in great detail, and you can begin at any time, as well as take as much time as you need to complete these assignments.

Good luck!
"All spirits are enslaved which serve things evil."
Latest Posts Comments Articles
    • What's your Poketeam? (Last post by Mindas Arran)
    • Quote: I was truly curious what anyone thought about this aspect of the game - the one that brings revulsion at the thought. This thread did put forth an opinion that the team you choose could somehow be related to some aspect of your personality. So what if you choose no team... in fact are repulsed at the thought of choosing a team? I'm pretty sure that you can still play without a team, you just couldn't do any gym battles. Personally, I love the competition, so I'm glad there's teams.
    • Knights of Awakening: Jedi Safe Spaces (Charles Mc... (Last post by OB1Shinobi)
    • i want to address most of your major points but im not going to be able to respond to all of this at once Quote: OB1, I wasn't going to post in this thread anymore, but since we've established an amicable exchange of ideas I will respond once and you're welcome to respond as many times as you'd like but this will be my last response to this particular thread. im gonna start here and hopefully i can finish tomorrow Quote: There are three ideas I see presented in your argument that I wish to address: 1. I am a self-loathing white person. 2. My ideals are reverse-racist 3. That personal suffering means there is no ethno-cultural suffering or is equivalent to ethno-cultural suffering. In response to the idea that I'm a self-loathing white person. I used to be. White guilt is a real thing, but it's also not inherently bad. White guilt can help white people take the proper attitude towards understanding the struggles of people of color, but it is essential to move beyond it. That doesn't mean ignore the feeling of guilt, but to work through it. It also doesn't mean you (random white person) will never feel guilty again, but it does mean you'll get to a point where guilt transforms into patience, understanding, empathy, and a refusal to be willingly complicit in white supremacy. Left unchecked, white guilt can become unproductive because it can become egocentric and therefore completely lose any utility. I was one of those people who let it become an unproductive thing and it took a long time to get out of that unproductive phase into one of understanding. Part of that process is removing yourself from the equation. That is to say that you cannot make criticisms of white privilege and supremacy about you and your feelings. You have to learn to recognize that these criticisms are not about you personally, but at the same time you need to analyze your own assumptions and behaviors and change accordingly in response to those criticisms. Some might call it depersonalization, however I shy away from that term because there is an aspect of these criticisms that is personal (via membership in the group being criticized). This is just the basics of it, but that's the gist of the idea. i know this seems completely insensitive to many people but i feel no more personally responsible for slavery or institutional racism than i do for the dark ages or the sinking of the titanic war is not my fault, genocide is not my fault, rape, murder, the holocaust, the mass killings of the communist regimes or the 20,000 yearly human sacrifices of the Aztecs, the untouchable caste in India, female genital mutilation, the genocide in darfur all these things happened and happen because human beings (of every race) are capable of great selfishness, foolishness, and cruelty technology and economics and well basically the development of western culture have resulted in whites having a great deal of relative influence in the modern world compared to other skin tones but thats more like the luck of the draw" it certainly is not a result of any particularly special trait inherent in white skin, and i take no more credit for all of the awesome things that white people (other than me) have done than i do assume blame for the terrible things they have done my personal responsibility is to look at my society as honestly as i am able, and to use my influence as well as i am able in order to nudge culture in the direction that i think it should go i do benefit from the system, yes, but as i have said before, this is what the system is FOR, for me to benefit, and also you; all of us the problem is not that i benefit from an unfair system, but that the system is still unfair but i didnt make it unfair, and i use my voice as best as i know how in order to make it more fair, and that is all i am ever going to feel i am responsible or guilty for: what i do or fail to do with the influence that i have i would add that i certainly do feel angry (and sad) at the injustices in the world, and when i look specifically at the injustices associated with racism in america i get angry at "whites" too but i know better than to stereotype anonymous people by their race, period: what makes racism wrong is that individuals are made to suffer negative consequences as a result of factors that have nothingto do with thier personal choices beliefs or behaviors  all fair judgement(if there is such a thing) has to be relevant to the individual s behavior, and even then it needs to be understood from the context of his or her personal experience stereotyping of all kinds is in inherently unfair and will produce more injustice all of our citizens need to have access to benefits protections and opportunities of our society and that is the message to focus on, imo
    • Evolution of Things, and division (Last post by Adder)
    • Growth occurs in some medium and so evolution probably needs to be defined in terms of both its internal and external consistency with something we could call 'nature'. I reckon that nature would need to address both domains to best represent the concept, and I think Jedi does this nicely with its inner and outer focus. I think that then also translates from individual to organisation; 1. Marginal, if at all. 2. Yes, though everything is unique if viewed in its proper context IMO. 3. Sounds more like an organisational identity crisis. But really depends how you define 'better' in better teaching. Why is it better, how is it better and what does the training program itself represent. The right fit just defines the program I guess, so it would probably revolve around what is that programs purpose? 4. Depends on the details. Things do change, but a lot does not, and some goes in circles and patterns. If change itself is part of the training then it gives value to compare and contrast the differences perhaps. 5. War Beauty once said time was an illusion, well I agree in a way. Being older does not mean out of date necessarily... so again it depends on the above things. 6. Depends on how one defines Jediism. 7. For me Jediism is not the collection of thoughts and teachings of people who've identified as Jedi. It's the particular application of that concept you introduced, evolution, of spiritual and scientific discovery in both those domains of inner and outer, and the understanding and empowerment in that regard to the experience of 'life' and therefore the Force. The fiction lends itself to it, and historical participation has real value, but neither define it for me. I don't think Jedi are followers, but rather leaders, explorers and problem solvers. In contrast, to rally behind a few proverbial 'forefathers' as gospel and choosing to isolate based on that reason alone is starting to make inroads into cult type behaviour IMO. I'm only speaking for myself tho, not the Temple or anyone else. I'm sure there is plenty of great stuff people have written, and it can and should be used to great effect, but my comments are meant to address what I thought you were asking specifically about evolution.
    • Jedi Knights Meaning (Last post by Kyrin Wyldstar)
    • Like Marta I answered this in my IP Journal. It describes my personal motivations for pursuing the title and what it means to me. If you feel so inclined please check it out. www.templeofthejediorder.org/forum/47-Jo...rnal?start=40#233515
    • Meditation (Last post by Bareus)
    • How do i meditate? I use my comfortable little meditation pillow, sit down and cross my legs (sometimes lotus, sometimes half lotus or just legs crossed) and place my hands in the "cosmic mudra" position before closing my eyes. After that, when the meditation itself begins, i start breathing. Not deep, or in any way else then what's natural to me at first (deeper and/or slower breathing usually comes around later), i focus on my inhales and exhales, and count every breath until i reach ten, when i do i start all over again at one. Should my mind wander away (which it always does :P ) i usually notice it after a while and do my best to focus at my breathing once again.
    • So, I really hate exercise.. (Last post by Trisskar)
    • I've gotten more fitness + fun = Healthy Results by playing Pokemon Go :) There are other apps out there too. Zombie Hunter....or....something like that. I never tried them, but I hear it's a great way to direct your focus towards a play mentality rather than a "OH MY GOD this Sucks!!!" mentality :-p
    • Your Jediism "Holy Books" (Last post by Leah Starspectre)
    • Although I'd probably put this in the nonessential pile, I found "The Mists of Avalon" by Marion Zimmer Bradley had a huge impact on my spiritual education. And those lessons would serve Jediism well even if the focus is around Paganism and Christianity. There is a lot of comparative religion and mythology in there. “I think too many people presume to read the divine Scriptures and fall into such terrors as this,' said Patricius sternly. 'Those who presume on their learning will learn, I trust, to listen to their priests for the true interpretations.' The Merlin smiled gently. 'I cannot join you in that wish, brother. I am dedicated to the belief that it is God's will that all men should strive for wisdom in themselves, not look to it from some other. Babes, perhaps, must have their food chewed for them by a nurse, but men may drink and eat of wisdom for themselves.” EDIT: Not to mention the narrative is an interpretation of Arthurian Legend, so there is much discussion about chivalry and knighthood, as well!
    • My 3-year-old brother doing telekinesis (Last post by Gisteron)
    • Despite the finickiness one finds in logic classes in philosophy - to my surprise, I might add, far greater finickiness than in any math or science class - when it comes to questions of possibility or probability, often in application wholly unwarranted assumptions are being made. Much like after one side's failure to disprove a proposition, the other side still has all of its work ahead of it to prove it, so does it not follow from something not being conclusively impossible that therefore it is possible. There are multiple different and conflicting models in possible worlds metaphysics and only under the most naive ones where everything is literally possible by default can we presume that any one given thing is. I do not know that telekinesis is real. I do not know that it could be either. If we want to be really finicky about this we would need to go on defining what we mean by factual or possible and whether or how we can differentiate the two from each other and from their respective opposites. I am open minded in the sense that I am willing to entertain hypotheticals. Propose a definition, give a few examples to indicate its plausibility or usefulness, then feel free to go ahead and provide evidence that your pet theory meets it. It's tedious and to some boring, especially when compared to the alternative "Look! Magic!" approach. Now, all that being said, of course, the thread was not so much about telekinesis itself (we had like two of those with Ryder before, if memory serves) but about the particular instance with the OP's little brother. I do however appreciate TheDude's posting especially of Darryl Sloan. Here we have a gentleman who may not be any more a man of science than Ryder, but if we assume he is being just as honest, in him we see a healthy response to criticism. He goes out of his way to implement at least all of the immediate and obvious controls and safeties and tries to get results despite the obstacles. Basically, at least from what we see, we are lead to believe that this is a man who is trying for transparency and honesty, one who invites rigor and criticism so as to grow all our understanding. Now, yes, we are dealing with a 240p video from 2009, and loud background noise that could be just about anything. We are also dealing with someone who, if he ever did take any formal science education in relevant fields, didn't find it impactful enough to mention on his bio on his website, and if he ever published his results for peer review, didn't find that that was worth mentioning either. So I can of course by no means say I am convinced. But, to be fair, I have no immediate likely explanation of what I saw in his video. To my knowledge this does not look like a quite so obvious trick nor coincidence the way Ryder's materials always have. Before judging Mr. Sloan's display one way or another, or equivalent displays, as it were, I for one would need more data.

There are 164 visitors, 3 guests and 30 members online (3  in chat): Br. John, Alethea Thompson, Guardianofwinds, ren, Adder, Darren, Proteus, Reacher, Alexandre Orion, Rosalyn J, Lykeios, rrhodes67, Kit, Avalonslight, Cabur Senaar, Adi, Tellahane, Hyrum Tigerprice, Ke JinnDakken, MadHatter, Cayce, Kyrin Wyldstar, Rex, Ryder, Codama, Leah Starspectre, Rahatha, DEEZYGAINS, Blitz7737.

Follow Us