How Do Jedi View Waterboarding?

Moderators: Adder, Desolous

How Do Jedi View Waterboarding? 25 Apr 2012 18:13 #57793

According to our temple doctrine, "Jedi Believe...In the sanctity of the human person. We oppose the use of torture and cruel or unusual punishment including the death penalty. 1"

I know that waterboarding is a very controversial issue (one that my dad and I always debate), and that the United States military has used waterboarding as a "advanced method of interrogation". I personally believe it is torture, but my dad always disagrees and says that it doesn't cause pain but merely "scares" the person (because he feels like he's drowning.

Moreover, as a Jedi (in training)...

1) I oppose torture and cruel and unusual punishment.
2) I think that waterboarding is torture because it does cause people pain and forces them to answer questions.


3) I oppose waterboarding.

What's your position on this matter? How do other Jedi view waterboarding?

1) Do you oppose any type of torture and cruel and unusual punishment?
2) Do you think waterboarding is torture? (Or just "an advanced form of interrogation"?)
3) (Therefore) Do you oppose or support waterboarding?

Thanks for you opinions, in advance.
Sean Ching - Jedi Apprentice
Teaching Master: Senior Knight V-Tog

Re: How Do Jedi View Waterboarding? 25 Apr 2012 18:17 #57795

One quick tidbit of perspective...

Some of you may ask why in the world would my dad think waterboarding isn't torture? (It seems a bit crazy to me.)

However, here is what I found on wikipedia: specifically about the Bush Administration's use of waterboarding and their justification for using it on suspected terrorists:

"During the presidency of George W. Bush, U.S. government officials at various times said they did not believe waterboarding to be a form of torture.[12][13][14][15] To justify its use of waterboarding, the Bush administration issued classified legal opinions that argued for a narrow definition of torture under U.S. law, including the Bybee memo, which it later withdrew.[16][17][18]"

So, my point is, even though I think that waterboarding is definitely torture (and I'm sure a lot of you also agree), there are many significant people out there that support it and deny that is is torture.

So there are many perspectives. Life is not simple.
Sean Ching - Jedi Apprentice
Teaching Master: Senior Knight V-Tog

Re: How Do Jedi View Waterboarding? 25 Apr 2012 18:21 #57796

  • Darren
  • Darren's Avatar
  • Knight
  • Deacon
  • ID: 8542
I oppose torture and cruel and unusual punishment.
To me, water-boarding is torture. Even if it doesn't cause physical pain, there is emotional and psychological pain involved.
Therefore, I oppose water-boarding.

Re: How Do Jedi View Waterboarding? 25 Apr 2012 18:24 #57799

It is not a punishment... it is torture!

I openly oppose all torture.
Some forms of water boarding are extremely painful... and they not only damage the body, but the psyche. People are never the same afterwards, and people have died a very slow and terrifying death from it.

I believe that the ends never "justify" the means and that we should conduct ourselves accordingly.
I not only cherish human life, but hold a sanctity to all life.

Re: How Do Jedi View Waterboarding? 25 Apr 2012 18:25 #57800

  • NickCB
  • NickCB's Avatar
  • Novice
  • ID: 10295
It would depend how you define torture, if its mental then yes waterboarding is mental torture but it is not physical. Its similar to the water torture of dripping water on someones head although that does cause more physical damage.
The issue is that many see torture as physical and not mental

Re: How Do Jedi View Waterboarding? 25 Apr 2012 18:28 #57802

  • LTK
  • LTK's Avatar
  • Knight
  • ID: 8277
I don't know that I would call it torture, but in my quickly formed opinion that is subject to change, I think I'm against it simply because it can be a slippery slope to other extreme forms of punishment.

Instead, ask the prisoner what his favorite foods and dessert are. Then just give the prisoner bread and water while you eat their favorite meals everyday in front of them. Do this until they crack. I'd crack on that kind of treatment in about a day.

See? You don't need "aggresive negotiations."

Master: Jestor
“I have striven not to laugh at human actions, not to weep at them, nor to hate them, but to understand them" -- Baruch Spinoza.

Re: How Do Jedi View Waterboarding? 25 Apr 2012 18:31 #57803

  • V-Tog
  • V-Tog's Avatar
  • Senior Knight
  • Priest
  • ID: 9122
1) Do you oppose any type of torture and cruel and unusual punishment?

Yes. Who are we to grant ourselves the power to cause other people pain and suffering? My moral code finds the concept of torture abhorrent. And aside from that, what if the person turned out to be innocent?

2) Do you think waterboarding is torture? (Or just "an advanced form of interrogation"?)

Absolutely. It is supposed to simulate drowning, is it not? Imagine what it must feel like to drown - to feel as though your lungs are filling with water and you can't breathe. I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy.

3) (Therefore) Do you oppose or support waterboarding?

Oppose. Very very strongly.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Wescli Wardest, Harvestpaw

Re: How Do Jedi View Waterboarding? 25 Apr 2012 18:42 #57805

Well, I think we can all agree that waterboarding is something we would not like to do or to be subject of. In my opinion it is clearly a form of torture.

From the linguistical point of view:

If we look the definition of torture up, in the spanish royal language academy dictionary (Real Academia Española de la Lengua), we find the following definition:
Grave dolor físico o psicológico infligido a alguien, con métodos y utensilios diversos, con el fin de obtener de él una confesión, o como medio de castigo. which means: serious physical or psicological pain inflicted to someone with diverse methods and tools, with the goal of obtaaining a confession or as a punishment. therefore wateboading would be a form of torture.

From the moral point of view:

From this point of view another controversy arises, ¿Is it justified in some situations to inflict pain on another person to obtain information which may save a life?. I say to save a life because I believe that the right to live is the highest one there is, and therefore the only one that may justify moraly wrong actions like forms of torture, or even terminating another life (self defence), when my right to live conflicts with the right to live of another.

Any other situation where torture is applied for other reasons I cannot justify. For me only life is worth enough to corrupt our behaviour in such a way.

1. I oppose forms of torture and unsusual punishment. The only exception I see is that as a result of it a life may be saved.
2.Yes, I think waterboarding is torture
3. I totally oppose this type of torturing. Appart from beeing a form of torture, it is also too aggressive, and may therefore cause not only permanent psicologycal damage (trauma) but also death if not done "right".

Re: How Do Jedi View Waterboarding? 26 Apr 2012 15:54 #57900

  • Akkarin
  • Akkarin's Avatar
  • Councillor
  • Priest
  • ID: 484
Any other situation where torture is applied for other reasons I cannot justify. For me only life is worth enough to corrupt our behaviour in such a way.

You think it's worth it when we corrupt our behaviour? How is it you think that it's possible to have larger ideals if the smaller ones get compromised?

It's like building a house without a foundation. Sooner or later it will collapse.
V-Tog wrote:
1) Do you oppose any type of torture and cruel and unusual punishment?

Yes. Who are we to grant ourselves the power to cause other people pain and suffering? My moral code finds the concept of torture abhorrent. And aside from that, what if the person turned out to be innocent?

2) Do you think waterboarding is torture? (Or just "an advanced form of interrogation"?)

Absolutely. It is supposed to simulate drowning, is it not? Imagine what it must feel like to drown - to feel as though your lungs are filling with water and you can't breathe. I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy.

3) (Therefore) Do you oppose or support waterboarding?

Oppose. Very very strongly.

That is my view exactly
Sean Ching via Wikipedia wrote:
the Bush administration issued classified legal opinions that argued for a narrow definition of torture under U.S. law

That is simply using the letter of the law to defeat the spirit of the law
Never ask more of another than you are prepared to offer of yourself.

Apprentices: discorder, hellisforhorses, Red Lila, Xaii
Former Apprentices: Desolous
Former Master: Br. John

Head of Public Relations and Marketing
Associate Pastor
The following user(s) said Thank You: V-Tog

Re: How Do Jedi View Waterboarding? 26 Apr 2012 15:59 #57901

Anyone that considers waterboarding not torturous should be waterboarded themselves- and I happen to like Bush (not getting into politics here, so don't start).

I am against waterboarding and torture- with the exception of withholding "treats" (soda, chai, tobacco, etc).
Alethea "Setanaoko" Thompson
Apprentice to Br. John

"Stop praying. Praying is a sense of false accomplishment, thus leading you to inaction. If you stop praying, you will be driven to take action, which in the end will prove more effective." - Nathan Thompson
Latest Posts Comments Articles
    • The Force as described by a physicist? (Last post by OB1Shinobi)
    • Quote: Quote: Quote: Its not relevant to me. its not APPEALING to you it is absolutely RELEVANT to you, as the story of Jonah illustrates, although i admit that my own explanation of it is amateur (which is why i reference academic sources) it is relevant to you but you dont want to see that because THE IDEA THAT IT IS RELEVANT is not appealing to you - which reminds me of a story about a god named osiris who willfully put himself inside of a coffin as a result of the fact that he refused to acknowledge the reality or relevance of something that was right in front of him - the danger that was posed to him by his brother seth, WHO IS UNDERSTOOD AS A MYTHOLOGICAL SYMBOL OF CHAOS so its funny (to me) that a guy who calls himself Khaos would promote willful blindness in a discussion so heavily focused on the themes of mythology in a sense you actually reenact one of the myths whose relevance you deny, BY THE DENIAL OF ITS RELEVANCE lol its kind of poetic actually Quote: As I said, if you need stories to back your moral and ethical dos and donts, fine. i would like to ask you what "backs" your ethical do's and dont's, and where and how you learned those things, and if you seriously think that you just came to those conclusions all by yourself, without the social foundations which were the source of -- well to start with your existence, and everything which that means or imlies, including of course your ethics lol and anyway ive explained that the myths dont "back" ethics, they express the realities of different kinds of human behavior the social patterns exist first, then the myth is developed to articulate the pattern so that civilization doesnt have to keep repeating the same mistakes - or willingly put themselves into coffins lol but i respect that youre not interested in the discussion, which seems to have moved on anyway i wouldnt even have posted this but the bit about seth and chaos was too good to pass up You do know we dont have to agree on this right? Khaos, is a screen name on a forum. I think you have looked deeper into it than I have. As I have repeated a couple of times now, if you need stories to back your moral and ethical do's and don'ts, that's fine. It has no relevance to me, and I have no desire to try convince you otherwise that I dont need, or use them for mine. You ultimately wont believe me anyway. I also see that it is important to you, but I have no desire to challenge nor seek to remove that foundation. I havent that power anyway. This conversation, which has now been largely one sided, as I have repeated my disinterest in it, is going to the road to nowhere fast. Here, lets just make it simpler. Your right, im wrong. Better? Can we move on? Again, its not relevant to me, or appealing, or interesting, no matter how many caps you use. its not important to me that you agree with me, or even recognize the point i make and im not reading anything INTO your screen name - im just reading the name itself and i notice the correlation because its there and its funny "if you need stories to back your ethical do's and donts" is not only a presumptuous, simplistic and dismissive way to refer to my belief structure, but it is also response which implies that your belief structure was developed in some fundamentally different way than my own - and im confident that it wasnt, because we are fundamentally the same thing: human beings and while the end results of these structures may come out quite different across individuals and cultures, the structuring process itself - that process or set of processes which result in the fully formed structures, are essentially the same for the entire species so i think its a totally fair response to your statement about my ethics to ask you "well, how did you develop your own structure of ethical dos and donts?" and this is a fair response no matter how many snide evasions you use to avoid answering lol i think it was the idea of science ending human civilization that drew you in to the discussion with me, and since we arent talking about that now, and since you keep saying you arent interested in the discussion THAT YOU KEEP HAVING, i guess i have to acknowledge (AGAIN) that i also see no reason for you to continue with our conversation so by all means feel free to move along at any time lol and my best wishes to you
    • An Apology (Last post by Jamie Stick)
    • It is with heavy heart that I acknowledge that I have not handled my problems the way I was supposed to. I publicly called out Ros about two sermons that were overlooked in the sermon schedule. Though in my mind I believed I was doing the Temple a service by pointing this out for everyone to see, it has been made clear that there were many steps I could have taken before a public shaming was called for. That was an error in judgment on my part. Unfortunately my error in judgment has effected more than myself, but the clergy, the Synod, and Ros. I am also aware that my comments regarding the Synod might have been construed as public criticism and while my intention was not to do so, the outcome still bears a striking resemblance to the same harmful behavior I conducted towards Ros. This apology is primarily for Ros, but also the rest of the clergy for not upholding a certain standard for how problems are handled, and to the Synod who I've embarrassed with my actions as a member of the clergy. If there is anything I can do to make this right, feel free to offer suggestions here or in my PM inbox.
    • Wisdom repeated back to you.. :) (Last post by KageKeeper)
    • Quote: I have a different thing happening. When I was younger, I would reject wisdom out of hand sometimes from older generations. Now, as I have come through the years, I realize that in many ways it is true that youth can be wasted on the young, and that some things, you simply have to live long enough to truly understand or appreciate. I find I am the one now, as a father, a teacher, etc, that repeats the wisdom. This is also so very true. It is such a unique perspective to see our kids doing exactly what we did at their age, including ignoring all advice and wisdom from OUR parents. :D
    • Jedi Bush-trackers... (Last post by carlos.martinez3)
    • Quote: Quote: a tip for starting fires without a match.... So far, I have successfully started fire with every "element" (whether Classical or Wu Xing) except water. It's next on my list. My favorite method, however, is the fire piston. [video] omg im a fan but that takes some clear working knowledge.
    • Videos not showing (Last post by Tellahane)
    • Quote: I'm finding since the change to https that I'm not seeing some people's videos, even though it's clear others can see them. This is happening on both my mac and my work pc.. (I use Firefox). It's not going to be cache issues etc because my browser clears it on each closure. Anyone any ideas? On the videos I've seen problems with in the past, videos that were put in before the https change, have a url to the http:// version of the site, and most browsers will block content of non secure stuff when your on a secure page. The fix would be to update the links of videos to their https versions, ie just adding the s will work because youtube has the same secure pages as well. It's just up to going back to those videos and fixing the links in most cases. For example: http: // will not show https: // will show videos added after the change I believe have the correct https automatically, but ones in posts from before hand doesn't, so any videos still at the old links in posts will not show by default via your browsers security, and its settings. some browsers you can kill the security settings and have it show no matter what, but I don't recommend that unless its a browser you don't do anything secure on at all, ie log into your bank or paypal or webmail etc. Just need to go back and fix any video links that are now broken.
    • Live Your Legend (Last post by Goken)
    • Quote: Quote: I learned though, that I needed to be empty to discover what I really wanted to be filled with. Very profound! Can I use this for something I'm writing for the Temple? Absolutely. B)
    • I think people are falling for it (Last post by Yabuturtle)
    • Aside from the holes in stories you notice much of the media tries to make everyone who questions the official story nuts. Even Bush himself said "Let us not tolerate any outrageous conspiracy theories, concering the attacks on 9/11" Doesn't this sound strange to anyone? How there's some sort of event that happens, you see some trying to cover it up and try to call anyone nuts who questions them. If what some of them spoke was true, why try to cover it up? With all the racial tension and the whole Muslim hating thing, there's some serious divide and conqeur mentality going on and pretty soon people all over might be fighting each other.
    • saber build (Last post by RyuJin)
    • the saberstaff...gave it a twirl's a bit heavier than i expected, other than that it works well despite being over 8 feet long...and despite its weight it moves quite fast using the lotus spin (darth maul's twirling technique)...with a bit of practice to remove my rust it'll be quite impressive... [attachment]
    • Fear of Ridicule (Last post by MartaLina)
    • Quote: It is well known among my friends here, and now another circle of friends, ;), that my wife is anti-jedi... She is actually anti religion, like so many, she thinks 'sheeple', and its all fake, and blah, blah... She also suffers from, well, lack of faith, lol... She gets overwhelmed by life, and the pressures of it, and forgets quite often that 'everything will be alright'... I just share the wisdom, I dont share the teachings... How that is different, is that when she is talking, like all facebookers, all negative about the world, a person, or point of view, I remind her that we all march to the beat of a different drum... Not all 'jedi-y' (picture some hand waving here, ;)), but rather just in the 'shoulder shrug, it doesnt upset me' kinda way... After a few years, and enough of that stuff, I have heard some of my little gems come back out of her mouth... We dont discuss my time here... Which is numerous, because it is such a hot topic for her... And, I learned to not say "hold on" when she wants my attention... I may be in a conversation, or mid post in a reply, and will 'lock the screen' (make it go dark, my phone is never locked with a passcode or anything, just takes a swipe to open), and turn my attention to her... While I value my time here, I also value her a bit more... I have invested 17 years in marriage, and 30+ in friendship... She can think I am crazy, or gullible, or whatever... I dont find Bejeweled, or Soda Pop wars, or Sims, or Smurfs, or any of those games she plays as fun, and I have tried, but then I get all philosophical, and the game loses it fun... And, that's cool for her.. At the pinnacle of disagreements, I told her that I do not find those games fun, and I would rather talk about philosophical stuff for my fun... (yea, Im fun at parties, lol)... You can still discuss the ideas, but you have to use other world stories to convey them, such as the refugees, Trump, terrorists, and so on... I hope that helps... Yes that helps , we all have to work around other peoples preconceptions and their view on life, even if we live under the same roof , we still have to go our own path, and in these matters Love is of the most important , it teaches us we can giggle over someones believes without hurting them in a nasty way , and if we do , accidentaly , we can say sorry , i love you , for who you are and move on ! :woohoo:
    • We need you! (Last post by Rosalyn J)
    • I'd like to get this thread back on track. Ive made a few changes to the calander. An updated version is here: As always, my pm box is open if youd like to be added
    • Is anything not a metaphor? (Last post by Loudzoo)
    • Why might it be helpful to recognise everything we experience as metaphor? I think we’ve established that the definition of metaphor requires it to be a figure of speech. I’d argue it’s also perfectly valid to use the word ‘metaphor’ as a metaphor in the sentence “everything we experience is metaphor”. It’s a metaphor to address the fact that what we experience of the world, via our senses, is not the whole story, and not solely dependent on the properties of the ‘object’ we’re interacting with. As far as I’m aware there is no English word that adequately describes this phenomenon so it is perfectly valid to try and describe it, using the word ‘metaphor’ as a metaphor. What we see, touch, hear and taste is not solely due to the intrinsic nature of the object we’re sensing. The information that we glean about anything has as much to do with the nature of our sensory apparatus and cognitive processing as it has to do with the object we are sensing, itself. The object does exist but it does not exist independently of the interaction, as far as we can ever know. It’s the interaction we experience, not an isolated object or set of objects. People are free to believe that objects do exist independently of each other - but we can never prove that they do. The idea of independently existing objects is just a hypothesis. As David Bohm wrote in his book Quantum Theory: “ . . . the world cannot be analysed correctly into distinct parts; instead it must be regarded as an indivisible unit in which separate parts appear as valid approximations only in the classical limit . . . thus, at a quantum level of accuracy, an object does not have any “intrinsic” properties belonging to itself alone; instead it shares all its properties mutually and indivisibly with the systems with which it interacts . . . Although such fluidity and dependence of form on the environment have not been found, before the advent of quantum theory, at the level of elementary particles they are not uncommon in fields such as biology, which deal with complex systems.” So the way we commonly see the world – as being made up of distinct independent objects is not supported by scientific fields such as biology, ecology or quantum theory. There is an argument often put forward that quantum theory doesn’t apply on the macro (or classical) scale of our experience. I find this argument unconvincing. Our experience of solidity day to day is explained by quantum theory – indeed it’s the only good theory we have to explain it. This pre-amble is important because hopefully it begins to sketch a picture that our perception of reality – is not an objective reality. Indeed we can never know an objective reality – it may exist but we can never know it. Our experience is a kind of language with which we can comprehend our interactions – but only in a metaphorical like manner. I hope that idea is not too offensive. Clearly the ‘regular’ way of seeing the world is helpful in many ways. But if solely relied on it can lead to many delusions that are literally figments of our imagination, and literally do not exist other than in our minds. Personally I’m keen to understand what aspects of my experience are worth my limited attention and emotional bandwidth. Understanding my experiences as metaphors for what may, or may not, be actually going on might help take some of the sting out of them, make them less painful without reducing my awareness of them, allowing me to respond in more constructive ways than might otherwise be the case. I can expand on this further if you would like. Lastly, I don't see these [two] viewpoints as being mutually exclusive, or the sum total of the perspectives we can have. I find both viewpoints helpful in my day to day life.

There are 728 visitors, 20 guests and 62 members online (6  in chat): Akkarin, Br. John, Zanthan Storm, Jestor, Jedi_Roz, Kitsu Tails, Lightstrider, GtG1, Wescli Wardest, Garwa Mayharr, Desolous, Gisteron, Proteus, Alexandre Orion, Rosalyn J, Timberwolf, Lykeios, Khaos, KageKeeper, Brenna, Archon, Kamizu, elizabeth, Edan, Silvermane, tzb, Senan, Zenchi, Jamie Stick, carlos.martinez3, Cabur Senaar, Goken, OB1Shinobi, Loudzoo, Relyt Dagor, Atticus509, Xhaiden, CryojenX, Tellahane, Bareus, Athena_Undomiel, django, Golan Wilder, Mael, Ke JinnDakken, Jack.Troutman, Yabuturtle, MartaLina, standley, ETSubmariner, Skryym, Almeida, Breeso, McNulty, Colonial73, John.R, BionicPianoMan, Tolkien5045, CanadianVaquero, Maeros, Anubis, Kayota Cor, hab, Tamas, judahrbennett, Leightoncox, norton.

Follow Us