So... I won't bother responding to four and half hours worth of material, and here is why: In but the first remarks he makes, Mr. Braden claims two things: First, that he has a background in the natural sciences; and second, that in that background in the 60's and 70's there was just about no room for the notion of our state of mind or emotional makeup to - and I quote - "in any way affect the world around us".
These two claims are inconsistent. Either he had studied any science, be it even on a middle school level, in which case the other statement is false, or he genuinely feels that this is what the sciences were back in the days in which case he is lying about ever having studied them. Or maybe both of them are lies.
At any rate, since he lied at least once as early as half a minute into the video, I have no indication that anything he says thenceforth can or should be trusted. If anybody more decent wishes to present his arguments in his stead, we can have a discussion but I for my part feel no need to talk to anybody who ontop of taking less than a minute before starting to lie to the camera also cannot or will not respond to our discussion here.
Better to leave questions unanswered than answers unquestioned
