Temple of the Jedi Order logo

   

May the
Force
be with you:

We are real Jedi.

We believe in Peace, Justice, Love, Learning and using our abilities for Good. We are not fictional Jedi, nor are we role playing. We live our lives according to the principles of Jediism and work together as a community to both cultivate and celebrate.

Learn more Join now

 


HOW DANGEROUS IS MARIJUANA 
COMPARED WITH OTHER SUBSTANCES? 

 

Number of American deaths per year that result directly or primarily from the following selected causes nationwide, according to World Almanacs, Life Insurance Actuarial (death) Rates, and the last 20 years of U.S. Surgeon Generals' reports. 

 

TOBACCO 340,000 to 450,000
ALCOHOL (Not including 50% of all highway deaths and 65% of all murders)  150,000+
ASPIRIN (Including deliberate overdose)  180 to 1,000+
CAFFEINE (From stress, ulcers, and triggering irregular heartbeats, etc.)  1,000 to 10,000 
"LEGAL" DRUG OVERDOSE (Deliberate or accidental) from legal, prescribed or patent medicines and/or mixing with alcohol - e.g. Valium/alcohol  14,000 to 27,000 
ILLICIT DRUG OVERDOSE (Deliberate or accidental) from all illegal drugs. 3,800 to 5,200 
MARIJUANA

 

(Marijuana users also have the same or lower incidence of murders and highway deaths and accidents than the general non-marijuana using population as a whole. Crancer Study, UCLA; U.S. Funded ($6 million), First & Second Jamaican Studies, 1968 to 1974; Costa Rican Studies, 1980 to 1982; et al. LOWEST TOXICITY 100% of the studies done at dozens of American universities and research facilities show pot toxicity does not exist. Medical history does not record anyone dying from an overdose of marijuana (UCLA, Harvard, Temple, etc.). 

 

 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Drug Enforcement Administration


In The Matter Of MARIJUANA RESCHEDULING PETITION


Docket No. 86-22


OPINION AND RECOMMENDED RULING, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE FRANCIS L. YOUNG, Administrative Law Judge


DATED: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988

 

Section 8 of Judge Young's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision."

Page 56 & 57 http://mojo.calyx.net/~olsen/MEDICAL/YOUNG/young

3.  The most obvious concern when dealing with drug safety is the possibility of lethal effects.  Can the drug cause death?

4.  Nearly all medicines have toxic, potentially lethal effects.  But marijuana is not such a substance.  There is no record in the extensive medical literature describing a proven, documented cannabis-induced fatality.

This is a remarkable statement. First, the record on marijuana encompasses 5,000 years of human experience.  Second, marijuana is now used daily by enormous numbers of people throughout the world.  Estimates suggest that from twenty million to fifty million Americans routinely, albeit illegally, smoke marijuana without the benefit of direct medical supervision.  Yet, despite this long history of use and the extraordinarily high numbers of social smokers, there are simply no credible medical reports to suggest that consuming marijuana has caused a single death.

6.  By contrast aspirin, a commonly used, over-the-counter medicine, causes hundreds of deaths each year.

7.  Drugs used in medicine are routinely given what is called an LD-50.  The LD-50 rating indicates at what dosage fifty percent of test animals receiving a drug will die as a result of drug induced toxicity.  A number of researchers have attempted to determine marijuana's LD-50 rating in test animals, without success.  Simply stated, researchers have been unable to give animals enough marijuana to induce death.

8.  At present it is estimated that marijuana's LD-50 is around 1:20,000 or 1:40,000.  In layman terms this means that in order to induce death a marijuana smoker would have to consume 20,000 to 40,000 times as much marijuana as is contained in one marijuana cigarette.  NIDA-supplied marijuana cigarettes weigh approximately .9 grams.  A smoker would theoretically have to consume nearly 1,500 pounds of marijuana within about fifteen minutes to induce a lethal response.

9.  In practical terms, marijuana cannot induce a lethal response as a result of drug-related toxicity.

 

Comments  

 
#1 Andrew Wicker 2008-01-15 23:15
It makes me happy to finely see some cannabis support on here. Thanks Br. John, Cali, Washington, New Mexico, Nevada, and hawaii. (those are the only ones I could remember) have all made steps to bring the American culture a little closer to accepting Cannabis and hopefully bring us closer to understanding others as well.
 
 
#2 Aaron 2008-01-15 23:36
I think marijuana is a dangerous drug. I have talked to many meth addics and they all started with maijuana. No one ever woke up and decided they would use meth or coke. They started small and worked their way up to more dangerous drugs. Marijuana is like the sweet words of Palpatine to Skywalker. They sound really good until you are caught in its grasp! Beware!
 
 
#3 Andrew Wicker 2008-01-16 01:30
I disagree Aaron, I know alot of people that started on harder drugs, and Cannbis isn't always a 'grate-way' drug, well at least thats the case on the west coast. but facts are facts most people that try cannabis don't try other hard drugs.
 
 
#4 Toby Greenfield 2008-01-17 03:19
personally i think it really depends. i mean, every thing we do is a concious choice, whether its to start doing drugs or give in to peer pressure or any of that. so if u start snorting coke, its not cause u started at marajuana and just continued up a ladder, its because you decided to.
all ive ever seen from 'mary jane' is maybe being a little tripped out too much. and yea ill admit ive seen a couple bad puking reactions, but thats because the stuff is on the street and you cant be sure of everything you get, unless you are REALLY close with your dealer. if weed was legalized, the legal sellers would know there wasnt like PCP laced in to it or anything. things can only improve with weed being legalized. well except on one front: cost. prices over the counter or off the shelf or any of that will surely be higher than from your good friend down the street, you know?
Ok so thats my take on this.
 
 
#5 Br. John 2008-01-17 16:50
The Gateway Effect - NONSENSE

Marijuana use has not been found to act as a gateway drug to the use of harder drugs. Studies show that when the Dutch partially legalized marijuana in the 70's, heroin and cocaine use substantially declined, despite a slight increase in marijuana use.

If the stepping stone theory were true, use should have gone up rather than down. In reality, it appears that marijuana use tends to substitute for the use of relatively more dangerous hard drugs like cocaine and heroin, rather than lead to their use.

Thus, oftentimes strict marijuana laws themselves are the most significant factor involved in moving on to harder drugs like cocaine. Such is the case in Nevada and Arizona, the states toughest on marijuana use. Because selling marijuana is illegal and many drug dealers sell more than one illegal drug a customer is likely to be offered a free sample of cocaine, crack, speed or what have you.

If it were sold like alcohol this would not happen.
 
 
#6 Bradford Klaus-Peter Ermel 2008-02-07 15:48
Ah not only have I found a site that helps in my Jedi beliefs, but my belief in the legalization of Marijuana!

All the gov't needs to realize is that if they REGULATED it instead of BANNING it, not only would the crime rate drop DRAMATICALLY, but they would find a new sin tax!

When will we realize that the dutch have it right?
 
 
#7 Anaru Hika 2008-03-13 08:48
In New Zealand the gangs control the drug trade. This has allowed them to diversify into other areas. E.g Extortion, Armed Robbery, Intimidation and a host of others.
The profits made on pot have allowed them to continue their life style and recruit more members.
If Marijuana was decriminalised in this country it would remove a large chunk of their income and mean that they could no longer spend their days enjoying a free ride.
You could argue that they will simply move into harder drugs.... well, they already have.
Pot profits allowed them to do so.
The problem is already there...and the current laws ARE NOT WORKING. Unless we (in my country) are prepared to execute first time drug offenders (and we most definitely are not!) then we cannot 'solve' the problem (if there is one). New Zealanders enjoy smoking pot.
And the majority of them are law abiding citizens, they just recognise an unjust law when they see one.
 
 
#8 Jason Huges 2008-04-21 11:16
something like 90% of the prison population is made up of small time drug offenders; of that 90%, 60% of them are people busted for selling or using marijuana. I think it's the retroactive relief involved that has kept the US govt. from legalizing marijuana to the extent that only a couple of states like Oregon have, where you can have up to two plants within' your home. There and California, it's a misdemeanor to have less than an ounce on your person, as long as it's not divided for distribution. Vote Democrat!
 
 
#9 philbore 2008-08-17 12:49
i agree that authorities have far bigger problems to be concerned with than small time pot users... however I that rather than legalize the substance (which would cost thousands in rehab clinics) amnesty should be provided for users and the prosecution of small time growers should be halted however for people growing for mass profit other actions need to be taken as this can lead to further illegal actions (ie organized crime)
 
 
#10 Grigori 2008-12-29 23:58
Mary Jane is not a huge problem I agree. But that graph about Marijuana deaths is a lie. There have been.
 

Old - Old Category

Who's online

We have 342 guests and 11 members online

Latest Posts