Sven One wrote: Gisteron,
This Is merely a discussion I value your opinion but, you don't need to be overly critical of what I wrote.
This is not my first draft of a response to the quote above, so please understand it as a text created after the rest of this post. I do not know the line between an appropriately critical and an "overly" critical response; to me this sounds like a convenient and arbitrary enough distinction to be employed to dismiss an argument irrespective of its merits. You are free to not engage, of course, if you don't feel like it this time, and there is no shame in that either.
Also, the 2 commandments Jesus wrote if you study then extensively do sum up the 10 if you read what he saif after he finished speaking.
I don't know what exactly you mean by extensively, nor do I understand how someone can say things after they had finished speaking unless they start again. At any rate, you will find that Jesus did not say that the two he quoted were a summary of any set of ten but rather of the entire Law (Matthew 22:40), albeit that he doesn't literally call it a summary. Again, either your research didn't include reading the book or you are lying about what it says. If you choose to understand the Law as just the ten, that's your interpretation and though I may differ in mine, I shall readily grant you yours; but you don't get to lie about what the text actually says.
I might care little about energies you feel or chase after, but I do thank you for the general sentiment and your willingness to keep this on topic and impersonal, as it were. As you see, I myself do not always respond kindly to all things, but rest assured that my accusations against you, though perfectly sincere, are likewise never against your person but are meant to be understood strictly within the context of what you said in this particular thread.
