Grand Masters, Masters, Senior Jedi Knight, Jedi Knight

Moderators: Adder, Adhara

Re:Grand Masters, Masters, Senior Jedi Knight, Jedi Knight 23 Feb 2010 04:17 #29012

  • Br. John
  • Br. John's Avatar
  • Councillor
  • Bishop
  • ID: 523
Sweet Baby Jesus!
Founder of The Order

Re:Grand Masters, Masters, Senior Jedi Knight, Jedi Knight 23 Feb 2010 05:43 #29016

OK Tatsujin - firstly - I NEVER once said wiki was authoritative - never have and never will, im fully aware of its open source operation - as are most if not all our readers (or at least the adult readers) - I said its accurate.

There are hundreds of possible sources for this information, including the main scouting group website.

Im English born n bred - so if it makes you feel cosy inside - lets put it this way - Im giving the english historical version of the founding of the scouting movement - which funnily enough happens to be the nationality of Powell.

Another point - I dont see any 'grey area' in terms of the history - we're talking late 19th/early 20th century here - not several hundred years ago.

Neither did I once say the scouts and military are the same - you dont seriously think im that ignorant do you? This temple has DOZENS of active service personal, from all the forces from many nationalities - and as many if not more ex-servicemen/women. TOTJO also has regular interaction with the military for various reasons - and whilst I personally have not served - every generation of my family up to the current HAS served King/Queen and country - and has so dating back some 800+ years - im well aware of how the military functions thank you.

As a side note - linked to above point about language - I went somewhat out of my way to 'defend' you or at least put it to everyone else that perhaps youd been misunderstood - im starting to think 'why did I bother'

Have you had enough of the masters in this thread because you dont like being challenged over your statements?

To be blunt - a number of your posts have been quite abrasive - generally I put this down to language differences and the limitations of text conversations - I tend to cut everyone slack (when they are new or reasonably new) just in case its 'new comers defensive syndrome' or something - yet in an earlier post, you said

Tatsujin wrote:
If anything would make me want to leave, it's being put in a position to explain myself any time I affirm what the order is doing because someone is used to being assailed by people who don't get it.

yet your doing exactly this to others time n again.

Youve also said your seen as opinionated/snobby etc - have you wondered why this is? Perhaps lines such as this

Tatsujin wrote:
The third thought that crosses my mind is that I'm an intellectual who can post with clarity and defend myself well. This comes off to most people as being overly opinionated and snobby, so I can gather that when combining the three thoughts would result in people not reading what I'm writing and assuming their way through.

will explain this.

Your not the only one to have run many sites, your not the only one with any level of intellect but from the little I have experienced of you thus far is mainly your guilty of everything your pointing at others for. Most of the longer standing members here treat 'attacks' like water off a duck back- everyone has a different perspective of everything, one persons 'fact' maybe another's fantasy - history is written by the victors as they say.

I certainly am not going to disagree with your final line.

So back on topic - I think in terms of ranks etc - those who are 'rank haters' maybe have not quite thought about what the rank means. Just because one does not appreciate why another has a rank or title should not mean that they have no respect to the individual. Of course, respect is a mutual thing, but if your in a place (physically or otherwise) where ranks are used - it is only good manners to use the appropriate titles etc. You would expect a 'guest' in your home to treat you with respect and abide by your rules - so its simple course to do the same - be it in a home, public building, website or other place.

From what ive seen elsewhere - the main cause of problems in this regard is lack of understanding of what the title or rank means - with the knowledge of what they mean and what the function of the title and or individual - one can often avoid looking foolish or worse - ignorant.

Yes, respect is two way traffic - but someone has to 'go first' - so by showing the appropriate respect - youll be off to a good start in a given situation. As said, there will always be the little hitlers - but they are easy to identify, just keep calm and polite but dont fuel their rage or ego - if necessary, walk away - it takes at least two to fight ;)

As a final note - I have one irritation in terms of ranks and titles - its folks who (as an example) INSIST on being called 'Major' or whatever - when the last time they were in active service was in WW2. OK, they earned the rank in the military at the time, but military and civilian life is very different - most civies wont understand the ranks anyway and its especially maddening to see/hear elderly 'Majors' (again an example) get cross with say a 20 year old for not using the title. Whats the point? they will have only legitimatly had the title for a couple or so years anyway and once out of service - is the 'rank' theirs toi use anyway?

Would a serving soldier now, follow an 'order' from a guy who was a major 60years ago? I very much doubt it - so why do such folk think others should treat them differently. If you really want the name used - get your name changed by law (deed poll in the UK)

This really does only serve to feed the ego of the title holder - and at the end of the day - its only a word, a badge - it has no actual value and like money - you cant take it with you.

Everyone is equal in death and within the force ;)


Re:Grand Masters, Masters, Senior Jedi Knight, Jedi Knight 24 Feb 2010 23:48 #29039

Wow Tatsujin you really carried this a long way since I was last on.

Maybe we should withdraw from this subject or change the subject?
Rahm Kota: "The Force is strong in you my boy, to be able to sense my thoughts..."
Cheshire Cat: Different denotes neither bad nor good, but it certainly means 'not the same'!

Re:Grand Masters, Masters, Senior Jedi Knight, Jedi Knight 25 Feb 2010 00:11 #29040

  • stevef
  • stevef's Avatar
  • Knight
  • ID: 535
been on and off for a while, and I just noticed a clever post saying lets be respectful and call people by rank or title.
Wow, for a simple point this thread got really complicated... scouts and the UK and the military!

here's my rule of thumb and it seems to make sense:
if They are a master Call them Master X. I use the username in shout and the forums. If they are an apprentice call them Apprentice X or I think Padawan is acceptable to most. or Brother or Sister.
Knights Sir Madam or Brother Sister
If you and them are the same rank Brother or Sister is fine.
If you don't know and are too lazy to find out Brother or Sister.
Ya we can use the full title or multiple titles but it's less about who's what than being respectful of all of us. let me say that again, it's about respecting your fellow jedi.

if you look at the films, all the jedi were called by a title even by Palpatine, who hated them and wanted to destroy all jedi. If he can bite the bullet so can we.

but maybe I'm too simple to be in this conversation.


Re:Grand Masters, Masters, Senior Jedi Knight, Jedi Knight 25 Feb 2010 23:15 #29054

  • Jaden
  • Jaden's Avatar
  • Guest
  • ID: 1092
I been reading the whole thread and I would like to bring my small contribution in, saying what I think about ranks.

First of all I never see the rank, I see the person behind it and use the rank to get an idea about the amount of knowledge and work that person had until now. For instance I am an apprentice and it describes exactly what I am: a person that has more to learn in order to be able to teach others. As Kana Seiko Haruki said in one of the posts, a master is a normal human being which never looses the desire to learn and improve oneself for the good of others and make this world a better place.

We could put it this way: you call the one that gave you birth \"mother\". This is a rank. Before she gave birth she was a woman, she didn't knew how it feels and what it means to be a mother unless she had a child. This goes the same with our ranks: when you join in you know few things or maybe nothing about jediism. Later on as you learn your perception about life and other matters change, the ranks are there to remind of who you were and where you reached.

I personally see ranks as a tool to help new members and make the bound between members stronger. For instance when I will be called Master I wouldn't feel any different from what I feel now (it will just make me remember always about my duties and responsibilities I have towards the Temple and it's members)but I certainly know that a new member will come to me and ask for help because he/she would know that I am among those who know about TOTJO.

And yeah it's a matter of respect also. It's your choice if you want to use the ranks or not but I wonder if you would call your boss by his/her name, if you would call your school teacher by name and so on. As long as you see it JUST as a matter of respect you shouldn't feel offended yourself when others tell you to follow this simple rule and use the ranks.

Hope I managed to explain these things well as english is not my native language. Thanks for taking time to read this.

Re:Grand Masters, Masters, Senior Jedi Knight, Jedi Knight 26 Feb 2010 23:22 #29062

  • Br. John
  • Br. John's Avatar
  • Councillor
  • Bishop
  • ID: 523
Yes you did Jaden very well indeed.
Founder of The Order

Re:Grand Masters, Masters, Senior Jedi Knight, Jedi Knight 27 Feb 2010 22:48 #29068

  • Jestor
  • Jestor's Avatar
  • Councillor
  • Bishop
  • ID: 3682
The comparrison to 'mother'... awesome..

VERY well done Jaden....
Rite: PureLand
Master: Master Jasper_Ward
Apprentices: Knight Learn_To_Know, Viskhard, DanWerts, Elizabeth, Edan

"Together, the teacher, and the taught, make the lesson." -- Eckart Tolle

Dan: "I have enough teachers."
Socrates: "Oh do you now? Whether you have a proper teacher or not, depends on what you want to learn."

Latest Posts Comments Articles
    • Book of Sith - what do you think? (Last post by baru)
    • So they put out an other one of these "holocron" like books. And there is a third coming out " the code of the bounty hunter". The book was interesting. I has information in it. and I still do not like the "writing in the book" style that they continue to do. I wonder who would be writing in Boba Fett's book? The have Luke as one of the people who wrote in it. I bet he wrote in it when he was the apprentice to Dark Lord - which will be the plot of the next set of movies - the Dark Empire. I relate to these "dark books" in a similar manner. They are "fun" and they are "dangerous". They are fun because they explore the darkside in a way that is easy and accessible while not (generally) taking itself too seriously. Book like the "Necronomicon" are interesting because they use really symbols in a "fake" way. Is the book real or it is fake? They create so much mystery around it so it sells. So is it real or is it just a gimmick to sell a book? Its dangerous when people by into the book's "dark" message. Imagine if people by into it. Imagine if people take this book seriously and live as Sith? Are the writers prepared for that? Do they account for that? Or is it out of sight out of mind? Is there no writer's responsibility for what they put out there? Is Salinger responsible for what happened to - the mythology around the his book - "catcher in the rye" or is he absolved because its just a book? When I put my books out i like to take all that into consideration. How about you? What do you think? Is the writer responsible for the books effect on the world or not?
    • From time to time a poem (Last post by Llama Su)
    • The Realms in energy of the realms the energy of emotion put into the energy of fear put into the energy of believe put into the energy of distort put into the energy of hope put into the energy of reaction put into the energy of energy put into the energy of illusion put into the illusion of change put into the illusion of familiar put into the illusion of revolution put into the illusion of progress put into the energy of dying put into the energy of death put into the energy of de-energizing of parallels parallels of the energy of feeling put into the energy of clarity put into the energy of think put into the energy of coherent put into the energy of prayer put into the energy of action put into the energy of energy put into the energy of reality put into the reality of energy put into the reality of creativity put into the reality of evolution put into the reality of change put into the energy of life put into the energy of living put into the energy of re-energizing in the realms of energy John Trudell
    • What Do We Mean By "Order"? (Last post by rugadd)
    • Whether I am Knighted or not remains to be seen. This fish is having a hard time climbing the tree with the rest of the squirrels. But the ideal of a Knight of the Order is something I try to exemplify as well as I am able everyday. So from that perspective, perhaps I should share briefly what that means. Be your best. See the best in others. Pretty simple.
    • Ebola (Last post by Jamie Stick)
    • Apparently they're flying patients here to the US to treat them further. Am I the only one who thinks that sounds like a disaster waiting to happen? I mean, we're one of the wealthiest countries in the world and people still don't wash their hands or act smartly about avoiding getting sick (and that's just for the garden variety of illnesses).
    • What Do We Mean By "Temple"? (Last post by Luthien)
    • Historically, temples are places of worship where one may grow closer/stronger to the thing/idea they worship. Another definition of "temple", which I typically use, is something of special importance and attendance (e.g. my body is my temple, etc.). So, what does one do in a temple with these two given definitions? Contemplate. Con-templ-ate. To look at something on all sides or in all its aspects; to view or consider with continued attention; to regard with deliberate care; to study, ponder, or consider. This is what I see, most of the time: contemplation. It's a very Jedi concept, too. We contemplate in our temple. We consider different aspects of lots of things at a place that we hold as important and we carefully deliberate where we stand on an issue or idea. I agree that the "Temple" isn't just an idea, but is a part of our lives, both online and offline. If we're going to go that far, I consider the entire Universe to be my temple. :laugh:
    • Steamboat (Last post by babyblueyes247)
    • Quote: Show off. Now the rest of us are going to be sad and jealous that weve not had the chance to see his badassery in person :P I'm not sad or jealous :P I've ALSO met his badassery in person!! :woohoo: And then I was crazy enough to spend a week hanging out with him B)
    • The science of Rainbows (Last post by Senan)
    • :laugh: I can't even wrap my brain around this. Not the physics or biology of unicorns farting rainbows, but how a conversation like this begins in the first place. I just... can't. :laugh: Maybe we can make this an essay topic for the IP? :huh:
    • Cathedrals of Utopia (Last post by Alan)
    • Stones Rising is the name of the event which can be found at the church's web site Each stone is raised by hand. Ropes and rollers, levers and blocks. There are few concessions to modern technology. Two stones a year. One time we raised three stones and it quite nearly 'killed' us. One year we raised one 14,000 pound stone. The shape of the 'circle' is elliptical and we raise the stones sequentially moving around the ellipse with each stone next to the previous. It would make a wonderful place to hold a Jedi Conference. The church property is 120+ acres and is a full camp with excellent facilities. Camping is preferred but there is a dorm, a full institutional kitchen, dining pavilion, comfort facilities (showers and toilets). A river runs through it. The Stone Circle is magical. [attachment]
    • Gisteron (Last post by Gisteron)
    • You might also want to check out math sites about this. Operating on the axiomatic method, much of math will come down and rely upon these logical principles, and since most of set theory can be illustrated quite well with diagrams it may help you see what those things mean. I'm also pretty sure that you are both familiar with and employing these rules every day. Human thinking is strictly bound by them, and if not all of the implications, the rules themselves are pretty intuitive, not least because they are tautologies.

There are 203 visitors, 4 guests and 36 members online (4  are in chat): Br. John, Zanthan Storm, Octagon, steamboat28, Jestor, ren, Joe, Timartin, Connor L., Desolous, Psyddhattha, Proteus, Luthien, Alexandre Orion, Rosalyn J, PatrickB, Khaos, vincent valor, Gallileo Oortael, Buvan, Llama Su, Archon, Kamizu, Kohadre, wesleycook74, Edan, Senan, babyblueyes247, Zenchi, benedictveritas, Trice Corbel, Cabur Senaar, SeventhSL, TambelSadera, Lilith Lindsey.

Follow Us