Jedi views on homosexuality

Moderators: Adder, Desolous

Re: Jedi views on homosexuality 02 May 2012 04:03 #58645

My 2 cents on this would have to be:

I no longer believe that the United States, or possibly any other country, creates laws specifically for unity, general safety, and morality. Whether it be against homosexuality, or something else harmless, the government seems to exceed expectations on making laws just to simply--well, make laws!

And on the note of YthanH, I agree completely. Another good example is The bible was translated into English from Hebrew way before we even had a complete grasp on original hebrew. They have since corrected a few things but not all is complete, and not all is original.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Megan4506

Re: Jedi views on homosexuality 02 May 2012 11:01 #58669

@ bornofosiris: You're right. The Bible has been changed and things have been forged by peolpe many times, so (in my opinion) not every thing that's in the bible should be trusted, such as the views on homosexuality. No offence intended to any "bible-lovers".
Show compassion to all living beings.
Live to serve life.

Re: Jedi views on homosexuality 02 May 2012 11:28 #58675

  • NickCB
  • NickCB's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Novice
  • ID: 10295
On the Bible but, the one we normally read now was translated from Greek normally which was how it was written and some hebrew and there are a lot of miss-translations in it so it is possible that Jesus was gay or had a relationship with Mary just depends which translation you take and into how of it you read

Re: Jedi views on homosexuality 02 May 2012 19:24 #58757

Saw this on Facebook and thought it was appropriate (apologies to those that can't see it):
www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150833...28349&type=1&theater

A great argument against all those that quote the Bible (Old Testament) when discriminating.
Sometimes another door doesn't need to open just because one closes.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Akkarin, Viskhard, Darren, Kimla Daalm, Luthien, Kalkho

Re: Jedi views on homosexuality 02 May 2012 19:41 #58762

  • NickCB
  • NickCB's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Novice
  • ID: 10295
Mark Anjuu wrote:
Saw this on Facebook and thought it was appropriate (apologies to those that can't see it):
www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150833...28349&type=1&theater

A great argument against all those that quote the Bible (Old Testament) when discriminating.

Love that letter, always makes me cack up when i see it :D

Re: Jedi views on homosexuality 03 May 2012 08:56 #58829

  • Kalkho
  • Kalkho's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Apprentice
  • ID: 9870
To all Christians opposing homosexuality: Jesus clearly stated, that there are no Commandments greater than the Two Commandments of Love. You're not exactly loving your fellow men by hating them, do you?

Re: Jedi views on homosexuality 03 May 2012 09:11 #58830

  • Jestor
  • Jestor's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Councillor
  • Bishop
  • ID: 3682
I can't say it enough, I love this comic strip!


coffeewithjesus65.jpg
Rite: PureLand
Master: Master Jasper_Ward
Former Apprentices: Knight Learn_To_Know
Current Apprentices: Viskhard, DanWerts, Elizabeth, Edan, Brenna

"I do not demand your faith; I am not setting myself up as an authority. I have nothing to teach you - no new philosophy, no new system, no new path to reality; there is no path to reality any more than to truth. All authority of any kind, especially in the field of thought and understanding, is the most destructive, evil thing. Leaders destroy the followers and followers destroy the leaders. You have to be your own teacher and your own disciple. You have to question everything that man has accepted as valuable, as necessary."~Krishnamurti~

The following user(s) said Thank You: Akkarin, Viskhard, Darren, csmith

Re: Jedi views on homosexuality 03 May 2012 16:09 #58865

  • Akkarin
  • Akkarin's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Councillor
  • Priest
  • ID: 484
We were talking in chat and this was brought up:

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mahatma Gandhi
Apprentices: discorder, hellisforhorses, Red Lila
Former Apprentices: Desolous
Former Master: Br. John

Councillor
Head of Public Relations and Marketing
Librarian
Associate Pastor

Senior Knight and Priest of the Temple of the Jedi Order
The following user(s) said Thank You: PloKoon, Darren

Re: Jedi views on homosexuality 03 May 2012 17:27 #58876

  • csmith
  • csmith's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Novice
  • ID: 10203
@akkarin

What I said before about age of consent, I am merely trying not to encourage breaking Laws that for the most part, do protect the people without taking away a disproportinate amount of freedom. There can be no arguement that laws about legal age of consent do more bad than good. Do I think there should be a way to work around them whento individuals do consent with at least a decent idea of what they are getting into, yes. Legitimate protection good, tyranny bad.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Akkarin

Re: Jedi views on homosexuality 05 May 2012 16:09 #59172

same here Akkarin i fall in love with people
Latest Posts Comments Articles
    • Rants far and wide (Last post by Alexandre Orion)
    • :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: I'm less pissed off today ... :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:
    • What Are You Listening To Right Now? (Last post by Tarran)
    • It was 1969, I was about 2 years old, we'd just landed on the moon, and Sesame Street first came out - and this skit on that show was the very first version of this song I ever heard - I remember it as clearly as the moon landing on TV... enjoy! :D
    • Meditation Comes With a Price (Last post by Cyan Sarden)
    • Quote: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719544/ I remember a post about Shamanism and Mental Illness patients. I actually posted it at Force Academy. Last night, a long time member posted that he has been reading up on these sorts of things and posted the above link. In this article, it actually makes a case AGAINST meditation. I would be curious to see your thoughts. :) The conclusion deems meditation to be helpful and practical and tries to encourage medical professionals to educate themselves so they can apply the techniques better. It also says that strategies used for meditation are already present in modern psychology, making meditation compatible with treatments that are already being used in the field. As Arkayik already said: a de-mystification of meditation doesn't hurt. To me, meditation doesn't have a mystical side, never had.
    • The Force Explained (Last post by Adder)
    • Quote: Once without thinking, but with feeling deep compassion for an injured cat, I felt the same Force flow and directed it to the cat who recovered and was able to nurse her kittens. Not something I talk about with many people. Kewl, I think compassion is a great vehicle to connect to healing potential. My cat got diabetes from the result of a stressful even, bad diet and probably bad genes, and I was able to work with her to help her recover completely from it. She is now about 4 months without any symptoms, tests normal and no needles or medication required. She has never been healthier!!
    • "The Interview" gets pulled (Last post by Adder)
    • I think its ontopic still? I lean towards showing the movie and burning the book. IMO the movie can best be seen as not realistic and therefore acceptable satire (of the CIA), but if it were appealing to some real view or movement then it would be unsuitable as inflammatory. Burning the Quran to me, while inflammatory again is not a breach of anyones property. The inflammation occurs because of an extension of one parties rights over and above another parties rights, which I think is unfair. I don't think you should be able to tell people what not to do if its otherwise legal, unless doing so is deliberately designed to inflame. The problem here is is the burning being done to represent ones rights to burn it, or to inflame those who don't want it burned. I then view the measure taken by each party and unless its done in a way that cannot be by realistic measure avoided, then its acceptable. So burning a Quran on private property and posting a video online to me is ok, but going infront of a Mosque and on public property burning a Quran is not. Splitting hairs, but I think that is the best way to view it.
    • Spiritual agnostic talks. (Last post by Rickie The Grey)
    • Quote: Quote: Best to admit what we do know so we can know what we dont, so we can admit that. As it is, the average person doesnt truly know how ignorant they may be, because they have no idea how much we arent. I think we are on the same page. I just don't see myself as the center. Center of my life yes but still a speck in the big picture. Just a matter of perspective and a view of self importance. To each their own. I can't say who is wrong just what I believe.
    • Jedi In Combat (Last post by Adder)
    • Oh I think the military is a great place to train in 'Jedi', if the individual can see the greater value of it and not get caught up in seeing onself as a gear in a machine or the grind of repetitive work (things not unique to the military) - getting to paid to train for a living to be stronger and smarter in body and mind could be a great opportunity for someone who associates themselves to the Jedi way IMO - unfortunately the actual fighting side detracts from that personal perspective (usually) but that is where the nature of service comes into play. Its a really important discussion actually and I thank Reacher for posting!!!! Reflecting on the concept of self versus service to non-self is interesting, for in Jediism I do see some of the fundamental concepts might be focused on the dissolution of those distinctions, with the strong focus of the interconnected nature of the Force where oneself is integral to non-self. So I've tended to now see non-self as a part of self, and so service to self extends to include non-self!! It might just be the nature of different individuals seeking balance with themselves to relate to the Force, that for some service leads to self and for others self leads to service!? In my personal experience I was committed to service but couldn't make it happen (in the ways I would have liked), and so had to focus on self. What I found was that the focus on self in a Jedi context with the interconnected nature of the Force leads to some sensation towards a concept of almost obligatory involvement outwards into society (in various capacities) - when outer becomes part of inner and no longer are separated. I tend to think it might be why Mahayana Buddhism has this concept of Bodhisattva, not that it share the concept of 'enlightenment' but that the particular doctrine suddenly progresses with a heavy association outwards to all other life, and for Jediism it might be more about the things discussed in the Code. But service requires a certain strength of self plus a certain capacity to engage ones strength in that particular way, and that limits its applicability to those who can meet or train up to meet that particular avenue. I don't think its a universal entry point. I don't think the Code demands service explicitly but rather service is part of what it means to develop a greater/clearer relationship with the Force, and therefore relates back to the Code through that nature. Some people might need to focus on self to be a steward of the Force, while others might need to focus on non-self, but I'd like to think the balancing nature leads all Jedi to being stewards of the Force, that hope I can agree with 100%!!!

There are 517 visitors, 4 guests and 28 members online (none in chat): Akkarin, Shadouness, baru, Jestor, Connor L., Wescli Wardest, Proteus, Arcade, zeronycon, ChillBroBaggins, Silvermane, Jamie Stick, Mathew Erickson, Calanon, Cabur Senaar, Goken, Revan Falton, Tarran, Rocda, Ryno, den385, RaB, fredogaston, Dragonspeakerz, Ariane, Hitira38, Jamieson, TheForceWithin, Everett, Leonaxas.

Follow Us