Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN??

Moderators: Adder, Desolous

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 23 Dec 2011 11:20 #46481

Learn_to_Know wrote:
However, I'm not ready to subscribe to the idea that Jedi should have children. There is much that a Jedi can do in their service and compassion to others that doesn't have to involve raising their own. Perhaps even seeking out those children that are in a less fortunate position and helping them in some way?

As a matter of semantics, should and must are not the same. Jedi should have children but not all have the capacity or capability at this time in their life. I would also point out that working with any child is a form of parenting. If you have a desire to help other children that is wonderful. As a past PTA member I worked with many children in the school. I was also a Scout Master for several years.

In any one of these cases, you are raising children, you just are not paying for their cloths so to speak. Your influence on a child has an effect on them that lasts a lifetime. I have children I worked with 10 years ago saying hi to me in the grocery store. I wish I could remember all their names. They remember me because of the time I took to teach them how to read, or make paper, or chalk. I, in a very real sense, took an active part in raising that child.

So...raise your own or raise others? Either way be a positive role model!
Jedi Knight
Deacon of the Temple of the Jedi Order

Master: Mark Anjuu
Former Apprentice: Jedi Knight Arcade
Current Apprentices: Jedi_Roz
Read what I wrote not with your emotion and interpretation, but with mine!
Phortis Nespin
"Right and wrong, good and evil, light and dark most of the time, they are illusions that prevent us from perceiving the greater reality. The Jedi have learned to distance themselves from these illusions, to seek the truth beneath the words"
Luke Skywalker
“Selflessness is the only antidote to evil. It provides the light that destroys the dark.”
Corran Horn
The following user(s) said Thank You: LTK, Desolous

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 23 Dec 2011 12:16 #46484

  • LTK
  • LTK's Avatar
  • Knight
  • ID: 8277
Sapadu wrote:
'HAH!' Kendalina guffawed. Immediately, Jack should have known the Vader quote would upset her, 'Redemption for killing, what, THOUSANDS of people, just because he got that stupid b**** senator from Naboo knocked up and she popped out TWO kids? How is that redeeming in the SLIGHTEST?'

"Kendalina, you're not helping your case when I try to defend you as a pro-feminist model." Jack mumbled.

'No, I'm serious. The mother is the one who did all the work, Vader didn't play ANY role in how they grew up -- what with never BEING there or even being AWARE the children had been born or survived -- and he didn't get his head out of his @$$ until the very last second.' Kendalina fumed. Triclops didn't say a word, merely sitting by and knitting, 'And your children being the best of you? KARK THAT! That's just lazy, relying on a kid to justify your existence. You should be a good person on your OWN! Lookit Jango Fett! Having Boba Fett didn't redeem him. Or the Emperor for that matter -- 'cuz, y'know, HE was such a great person because of Trike!'

'The Emperor didn't have kids!' Interrupted Kakeru, in a very Star Trek-not-knowing-Star-Wars-lore sort of voice.

'Sure he did -- but it was in cloning experiments kinda like the Jango/Boba Fett crossed with Frankenstein way.' James snapped back, fanboy to the core. Tired of the argument, Triclops sighed.

'Maybe the real lesson is Vader's ability to love.' It certainly shut everyone up, 'He turned to the Dark Side because the obsessive, violent part of his love for his wife turned into possessiveness. What redeems him is the fact that he loves his son enough to save that son.'

"I like her passion, but I think we disagree on the word redeem," LTK said quietly.

His Force Conscience paused momentarily before prompting softly, "What does redeem mean to you?"

LTK contemplated carefully, debating within himself how to best phrase it. Not being entirely sure of his choice of words, he proceeded cautiously.

"I look at redeem in this scenario with Vader as simply a desire to not repeat the same mistakes again." LTK paused a moment, feeling like he wasn't being as clear as he desired. "He finally turned his back on the darkness, and it was because of the suffering of his son, what he was witnessing that spurred him on. His child may not have redeemed him from his past evils, but he certainly effected a huge change on Vader as he turned against the embodiment of evil. That is kind of like redemption, isn't?"

His Force Conscience nodded sagely, but was somewhat disappointed at LTK's struggling to explain a concept that should be clear and concise. "What about her comment about using a kid to justify your existence. I believe she said you should be a good person on your own, not just because you have a kid."

LTK quickly replied, "I agree with her there. We should be a good person on our own. To have to rely on children to be good would be an attachment a Jedi shouldn't have."

His Force Conscience smiled delightedly. "She is definitely right. And you are on your way to understanding this, possibly as well as she already does. But one thing shouldn't be forgotten: understand that you should be a good person on your own, you should strive to be an even better person when guarding and training a light that comes from the Force."
Master: Jestor
“I have striven not to laugh at human actions, not to weep at them, nor to hate them, but to understand them" -- Baruch Spinoza.

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 23 Dec 2011 14:41 #46488

  • Leena
  • Leena's Avatar
  • Apprentice
  • ID: 1965
I must say I like the question a lot. I agree with Phortis Nespin on this as far as the answer. I would love to have children and plan to when I find the right man to have them with. Now, aside from work, I have taught kids, mentored, and other things. It's so important to be a positive role model.

As for redeeming, that's an interesting point. Can that act of saving his son redeem Vader? Well, acording to some religions, yes. In Islam, I believe Muhammad said that if you do a bad deed followed by a good deed, the good deed will wipe out the bad one. In Christianity, Jesus' sacrifice redeems any who accept him and repent. Is everyone redeemed by their children, no. I think perhaps Vader was. Honestly, their mother didn't do all the work. She had the children and died. They were each raised by different people. It is a testament to Anakin Skywalker that even after he became Darth Vader and didn't know his kids, he still saved Luke's life and, ultimately, sacrificed his own.
“In times of change the learners will inherit the earth, while the knowers will find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists. ” Eric Hoffer
Master: Mark Anjuu
The following user(s) said Thank You: LTK

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 23 Dec 2011 23:20 #46494

  • RyuJin
  • RyuJin's Avatar
  • Senior Knight
  • Priest
  • ID: 3037
i say, let things happen as they must... if one is meant to have children it will happen (whether they plan to or not). whether we have children or not we should still provide a positive rolemodel to all(adult and children alike).
I do not need a cloak of darkness, I am darkness and I am light. I am both because the universe is both.
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
J.l.lawson, knight, b.div, o.c.p
Intake officer, Eastern Studies S.I.G advisor
Former masters: GM KanaSeikoHaruki, Br.John
Current Apprentices: Raikoutenshi, Zenchi, Baru

The following user(s) said Thank You: LTK

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 24 Dec 2011 03:24 #46495

I have 3 daughters and a gran daughter, they are my life!!!

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 24 Dec 2011 03:59 #46496

I have three fantastic children, I can't think of life without them now.

When my 1st one was on the way I was so very worried as I was not sure I was ready to be a dad, but when are we ever ready ???

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 24 Dec 2011 16:33 #46502

I don't really agree with Lucas that the point of life is having children- that's what a virus does, not more complex living things. We are more than our children.

However, I am a father myself, and can see the arguments for and against it in my own experiences. Parenting is a valuable teaching experience, and can be a great joy and fulfillment. However, your own body and mind does attempt to betray you and cause you to instinctively center on them. It has proven genetically valuable, but may not be the wisest course of action for a Jedi.

Through application of will, I have gotten to a place where I love my children, but feel no attachment to them, and do not revolve my life around them. Not many parents do all three of those things.

Saying Jedi should have children is something of a loaded statement to something that has advantages and disadvantages. I would say Jedi should be allowed to have children.
Latest Posts Comments Articles
    • The World (Last post by Krieger)
    • A single person can start a movement and thus make a huge impact on society. History proves this with such examples Bruce Lee, Adolf Hitler and Socrates. The stubbornness of man to change is but one of many hurdles. You must also consider antagonists. Those that would try to discredit the movement and tear it down without rhyme or reason. As Michael Cain said in The Dark Knight, "some men just want to watch the world burn".
    • Cultural Appropriation (Last post by Jedi_Roz)
    • Your welcome. This is how a traditional society takes care of each other. All of those goods get redistributed to folks who need them. For instance that elder has family that takes care of all his food needs but he could always use another good blanket, the drummers and flute players had to travel and while they were away they couldn't get food so I share the food with them, the rattles also help them keep time, the tobacco and such I give to those who have honored me. The robes as another form of honor to my teacher, my husband and I sponsored this event so we have enough and want to share our knowledge but the next time we attend something gifts will come back to us as well. It's all a circle. Some items are gifted many times and never stick around. At traditional wedding years ago I received a rattle that is probably 100 years old. It will continue its journey as a gift as long as it's around. When I do not need it any longer it will find a new home. Although none of this is set in stone either, if I know that elder needs food then I will also gift food back etc. Pretty neat stuff huh? I'm always honored to be a part of traditional ways. It is a beautiful culture and in these ways everyone is taken care of as well. Obviously this model does not work in today's world. Someone is always greedy and that's why sacred rites have become such a hot topic.
    • No inner monologue (Last post by Alan)
    • Is it a monologue? Even when thinking in words (silently in our inner thoughts) are we not talking to ourselves? When we talk to ourselves using our outside voice it is a conversation that we hear. So, a dialogue. Theory: Only a being with a sense of self and language skills can have an inner dialogue. Younger children do not have this inner dialogue because they have not yet developed a sense of self, even if they do have language skills Suggested reading: Consciousness and the Acquisition of Language, Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Also of interest: The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind by Julian Jaynes. Before the form of consciousness that we now experience developed (evolved), ancient persons thought their inner dialogue was actually someone else talking to them. The silent voice of perhaps, a god or other invisible being.
    • Changes to Simple Oath Wording (Last post by Edan)
    • You can take the oath whenever you want, but it is no longer a requirement for membership that you have done it. If you wish to become an apprentice however, you must have taken the oath when you complete the IP (you can take it when you're done).
    • Politics Everywhere? (Last post by Akkarin)
    • If politics is a form of agreed social management then it seems to me that animals do have politics, though of course not nearly as complex as ours (though maybe ours isn't even as complex as we seem to think it is?). Either way having something such as an Alpha male is a "kind" of political arrangement, alphas even have to occasionally fend off competitors from the same tribe looking to supplant them. The idea that the strongest (typically male) member of that group is the leader has only recently been abandoned, to some degree, in western history.
    • Sharing a locker room with a transgender (Last post by Garrat)
    • If one is searching other bodies for details, then they themselves dont know their way. not looking is respect, respect beacuse "why U looking so hard, you tripping" tripping becasue U aint in reality.
    • Temple Of The Jedi Order: Church Of Jediism - Ital... (Last post by Malmu89)
    • Traduzione e adattamento della pagina: DIVENTARE UNO JEDI Diventare un membro del sito non è la stessa cosa che diventare un membro del Tempio Jedi. Un utente registrato sul sito web è considerato un "ospite" fino a quando non diventa un membro. Un membro o "Membro del Tempio" è uno Jedi legalmente riconosciuto dal Tempio dello Jedi. Gli Jedi soddisfano i seguenti criteri: • Uno Jedi crede nella Forza. La forza risiede dentro di voi, vi circonda e scorre attraverso di voi; • Uno Jedi accetta i nostri insegnamenti e la nostra Dottrina che servono come guida spirituale per lo Jedi. Si può credere anche ad altre convinzioni spirituali (religioni) oltre a essere uno Jedi; • Uno Jedi ha completato la domanda di adesione. Inoltre consigliamo vivamente di leggere attentamente le FAQ che dovrebbe rispondere ad alcune domande che potreste avere. Se hai tra i tredici (13) e diciotto (18) anni non sei ancora idoneo a essere un membro ufficiale della nostra Chiesa e della comunità. Tuttavia, siccome sei considerato un minore è necessario che leggi le FAQ - Gioventù e seguire le istruzioni in esso indicate. Per diventare un membro dell'Ordine (Membro del Tempio) è necessario completare la domanda di adesione (compilando l'apposito form). La vostra domanda sarà esaminata dal Vice Presidente degli Affari dei Membri e, se necessario, dal Consiglio del TOTJO. E' raro per il nostro ordine rifiutare una richiesta di adesione, tuttavia, il processo di approvazione a volte può richiedere un paio di settimane. Nel frattempo vi consigliamo di presentarvi e di partecipare con discussioni sul forum, dandoci l'opportunità di conoscerti meglio. Puoi iniziare la formazione anche se non abbiamo ancora processato la tua domanda. Nel frattempo che il vostro status nella barra (il disegno sotto il nome) è Guest (Ospite) sarete solo in grado di rispondere ai messaggi nel sub-forum Jedismo. C'è anche un forum aperto a tutti che potete utilizzare in cui TUTTI possono commentare e scrivere discussioni fino a quando la domanda di adesione non sarà approvata e il vostro status nella barra del rango non cambierà in Membro del Tempio.
    • Jedi Community Action Group (Last post by Vagabond)
    • From Quote: noun, ( used with a singular or plural verb) 1. the science or art of political government. 2. the practice or profession of conducting political affairs. 3. political affairs: The advocated reforms have become embroiled in politics. 4. political methods or maneuvers: We could not approve of his politics in winning passage of the bill. 5. political principles or opinions: We avoided discussion of religion and politics. His politics are his own affair. 6. use of intrigue or strategy in obtaining any position of power or control, as in business, university, etc. 7. (initial capital letter, italics) a treatise (4th century b.c.) by Aristotle, dealing with the structure, organization, and administration of the state, especially the city-state as known in ancient Greece. Quote: adjective 1. of, relating to, or concerned with politics : political writers. 2. of, relating to, or connected with a political party: a political campaign. 3. exercising or seeking power in the governmental or public affairs of a state, municipality, etc.: a political machine; a political boss. 4. of, relating to, or involving the state or its government: a political offense. 5. having a definite policy or system of government: a political community. 6. of or relating to citizens: political rights. Quote: I reckon politics is about policy outcomes more then policy discussion or lobbying. The actual making of decisions and writing the wording of the policy. I think that is inherently going to create division - but I'm not suggesting that's what the CAG is about or anything, just reflecting on how I see politics. There are heaps of things the community needs action on!!!! So still reflecting on politics, the reason things require written rules is usually because people disagree and something needs to be laid out for everyone to follow - usually a compromise, but often more about strategy towards sustainable growth. I guess the only angle I'd be interested in is if it was that pure middle way approach, defining the fence so other people can decide where they sit, base diplomacy of determining the spectrum of rational thought and designing a position which takes the most inclusive yet functional mechanism as a balanced position. Though the results would often not be related to the Jedi way I'd imagine, but it could be seen as a service of the Jedi way, if that makes any sense. If it did align, then I guess the policy discussion could be taken to the next level and become policy production and subsequent lobbying. I think it was Benjamin Franklin who said 'people will either govern themselves or choose to be governed'. Laws/rules are just a methodology of doing that. Notice many semi-sentient species work just fine without laws/rules. The Jedi Way in its strictest form tends to advocate not becoming involved in national/international government except as counselors and guides. However given Rosalyn's groups focus on internal government, that certainly does apply for Jedi, except that as an independent group, it might have some difficulty with that. Quote: One thing I dislike about politics where I live is the uninformed lobbying - basically cheerleading of supported, and bullying of opposition parties. So if instead the intention is to focus on lobbying for the opinion of a group of Jedi, then its not so much my thing as I tend to think often the better outcomes are more often the less popular ones - 'gasp', I do though defer to the diplomatic mechanism Hehehe. There's good and bad in all things. Science, for example, can be used to advance our knowledge and improve quality of life, or it can be used to mutate, deform, etc. The same is true of politics-you get the people who work for mutual self-growth, and then you get those who use politics and government for there own ends.
    • Stupidity as a religion... (Last post by OB1Shinobi)
    • "im not just the president, im also a client" another issue this will affect is bathroom choice for transgenders this is why being offended is not an apporopriate justification for social regulation because it cuts all ways and it never ends we all suffer eventually everything offends someone
    • Making of a Jedi Warrior (Last post by OB1Shinobi)
    • a common translation of JUSTU is technique a common translation of DO is way ju is basically translated as gentle and aiki is translated as harmony so ju jutsu would be the techniques of gentleness and ju do would be the Way of gentleness aiki jutsu are the techniues of harmony and aiki do the Way of harmony the important distinction here is not about which style to train in one may walk a JUTSU path with WAY mentality or study a DO system with a TECHNIQUE perspective the importance is in understanding the distinction between the ideas and the function that each serves in the development of the warrior archetype to be good with a rifle or with a scalpel is a soldiers skill or a surgeons skill these are the JUTSU of a soldier or a surgeon and represent types of personal excellence to be fully commited to the development of ones skills and to being of the greatest service to ones field and through ones field, society or the rest of the world these represent the Do or the Way and are matters of personal character character in and of itself represents a type of skill and will invariable lead to the development of further skills skill by itself only perpetuates itself so the foundations of a solid warrior are first and foremost issues of character each individual has a unique blend of natural talent/potential and developed skill/competence in any given area the bridge between the two is character character is a result of commitment to excellence and respect for essential human dignity in the long run, the most effective people - in or out of the military - are the ones with the greatest commitment and the finest character it is an honor to follow a person of exceptional character, whatever the occupational field and it is shameful to follow a person of low character under any circumstances so the Way of the warrior is to cultivate personal character and dignity and the Jutsu of the warrior is to cultivate personal excellence and competence it is the love of dignity which translates these into the actual WARRIOR ethos because neither skill nor character per se result in courage but when character is infused with dignity it will not back down or give in to that which assaults dignity this is the type of courage that changes the world Dr King is an example of a totally non violent interpretation of the warrior archetype what made him remarkable is that he had that blend of character and competence and love of dignity he was not at war with anyone or anything- to think he was at war with racism or "the system" is to misunderstand his was a warriors mission of empowerment the kind of empowerment that only comes from the love of dignity
    • TotJO (Last post by Adder)
    • Yea, there are Jedi here who work with dark and light, and shadows and grey concepts, but like with a lot of the fiction - its not forced here onto people to become attached to something from the fiction (except maybe the 'Force' but that is open to interpretation?). I tend to view TOTJO as being less prescriptive in its approach for Jedi, where some other groups tend to focus on specific elements of the fiction to define their approach (sometimes for functional reasons and sometimes just for identity issues), we let the individual use what they want to work with, so long as it does not conflict with the spirit of the doctrine. The IP, Degree and Clerical Programs here do provide specific guidance, but its not based in the fiction so much, rather its to assist Jedi in how to best experience their Jedi path without actively prescribing to them what that path should be. This to me is the most inclusive method, as it not only allows people from other groups to enjoy the Temple, but it does still allow for like minded Jedi to form working groups or projects along cultural or functional approaches anyway. Thus the Temple grows based on the members interests and activity, rather then their adherence to its particular interpretation of the fiction (because we don't prescribe it). That's my personal view on it, hope I didn't confuse the issue for you :huh:

There are 376 visitors, 9 guests and 34 members online (none in chat): Akkarin, Br. John, steamboat28, RyuJin, Jestor, Jedi_Roz, LTK, Desolous, Proteus, V-Tog, rugadd, Alexandre Orion, Rosalyn J, Rickie The Grey, Llama Su, Archon, Kamizu, Edan, Wudan, a67, carlos.martinez3, Janice, Cabur Senaar, Cristris_Jons, Goken, GalUnDrux, Tarran, Ramadeus, Quaesitor Veritatis, Albatross, Atticus509, TheDude, Krieger, The Penguin, Oakenshaw, Mhall, Tombe, bloodx, Maverick Grey, fellini.

Follow Us