Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN??

Moderators: Adder, Desolous

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 23 Dec 2011 11:20 #46481

Learn_to_Know wrote:
However, I'm not ready to subscribe to the idea that Jedi should have children. There is much that a Jedi can do in their service and compassion to others that doesn't have to involve raising their own. Perhaps even seeking out those children that are in a less fortunate position and helping them in some way?

As a matter of semantics, should and must are not the same. Jedi should have children but not all have the capacity or capability at this time in their life. I would also point out that working with any child is a form of parenting. If you have a desire to help other children that is wonderful. As a past PTA member I worked with many children in the school. I was also a Scout Master for several years.

In any one of these cases, you are raising children, you just are not paying for their cloths so to speak. Your influence on a child has an effect on them that lasts a lifetime. I have children I worked with 10 years ago saying hi to me in the grocery store. I wish I could remember all their names. They remember me because of the time I took to teach them how to read, or make paper, or chalk. I, in a very real sense, took an active part in raising that child.

So...raise your own or raise others? Either way be a positive role model!
Jedi Knight
Deacon of the Temple of the Jedi Order

Master: Mark Anjuu
Former Apprentice: Jedi Knight Arcade
Current Apprentices: Jedi_Roz
Read what I wrote not with your emotion and interpretation, but with mine!
Phortis Nespin
"Right and wrong, good and evil, light and dark most of the time, they are illusions that prevent us from perceiving the greater reality. The Jedi have learned to distance themselves from these illusions, to seek the truth beneath the words"
Luke Skywalker
“Selflessness is the only antidote to evil. It provides the light that destroys the dark.”
Corran Horn
The following user(s) said Thank You: LTK, Desolous

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 23 Dec 2011 12:16 #46484

  • LTK
  • LTK's Avatar
  • Knight
  • ID: 8277
Sapadu wrote:
'HAH!' Kendalina guffawed. Immediately, Jack should have known the Vader quote would upset her, 'Redemption for killing, what, THOUSANDS of people, just because he got that stupid b**** senator from Naboo knocked up and she popped out TWO kids? How is that redeeming in the SLIGHTEST?'

"Kendalina, you're not helping your case when I try to defend you as a pro-feminist model." Jack mumbled.

'No, I'm serious. The mother is the one who did all the work, Vader didn't play ANY role in how they grew up -- what with never BEING there or even being AWARE the children had been born or survived -- and he didn't get his head out of his @$$ until the very last second.' Kendalina fumed. Triclops didn't say a word, merely sitting by and knitting, 'And your children being the best of you? KARK THAT! That's just lazy, relying on a kid to justify your existence. You should be a good person on your OWN! Lookit Jango Fett! Having Boba Fett didn't redeem him. Or the Emperor for that matter -- 'cuz, y'know, HE was such a great person because of Trike!'

'The Emperor didn't have kids!' Interrupted Kakeru, in a very Star Trek-not-knowing-Star-Wars-lore sort of voice.

'Sure he did -- but it was in cloning experiments kinda like the Jango/Boba Fett crossed with Frankenstein way.' James snapped back, fanboy to the core. Tired of the argument, Triclops sighed.

'Maybe the real lesson is Vader's ability to love.' It certainly shut everyone up, 'He turned to the Dark Side because the obsessive, violent part of his love for his wife turned into possessiveness. What redeems him is the fact that he loves his son enough to save that son.'

"I like her passion, but I think we disagree on the word redeem," LTK said quietly.

His Force Conscience paused momentarily before prompting softly, "What does redeem mean to you?"

LTK contemplated carefully, debating within himself how to best phrase it. Not being entirely sure of his choice of words, he proceeded cautiously.

"I look at redeem in this scenario with Vader as simply a desire to not repeat the same mistakes again." LTK paused a moment, feeling like he wasn't being as clear as he desired. "He finally turned his back on the darkness, and it was because of the suffering of his son, what he was witnessing that spurred him on. His child may not have redeemed him from his past evils, but he certainly effected a huge change on Vader as he turned against the embodiment of evil. That is kind of like redemption, isn't?"

His Force Conscience nodded sagely, but was somewhat disappointed at LTK's struggling to explain a concept that should be clear and concise. "What about her comment about using a kid to justify your existence. I believe she said you should be a good person on your own, not just because you have a kid."

LTK quickly replied, "I agree with her there. We should be a good person on our own. To have to rely on children to be good would be an attachment a Jedi shouldn't have."

His Force Conscience smiled delightedly. "She is definitely right. And you are on your way to understanding this, possibly as well as she already does. But one thing shouldn't be forgotten: understand that you should be a good person on your own, you should strive to be an even better person when guarding and training a light that comes from the Force."
Master: Jestor
“I have striven not to laugh at human actions, not to weep at them, nor to hate them, but to understand them" -- Baruch Spinoza.

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 23 Dec 2011 14:41 #46488

  • Leena
  • Leena's Avatar
  • Apprentice
  • ID: 1965
I must say I like the question a lot. I agree with Phortis Nespin on this as far as the answer. I would love to have children and plan to when I find the right man to have them with. Now, aside from work, I have taught kids, mentored, and other things. It's so important to be a positive role model.

As for redeeming, that's an interesting point. Can that act of saving his son redeem Vader? Well, acording to some religions, yes. In Islam, I believe Muhammad said that if you do a bad deed followed by a good deed, the good deed will wipe out the bad one. In Christianity, Jesus' sacrifice redeems any who accept him and repent. Is everyone redeemed by their children, no. I think perhaps Vader was. Honestly, their mother didn't do all the work. She had the children and died. They were each raised by different people. It is a testament to Anakin Skywalker that even after he became Darth Vader and didn't know his kids, he still saved Luke's life and, ultimately, sacrificed his own.
“In times of change the learners will inherit the earth, while the knowers will find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists. ” Eric Hoffer
Master: Mark Anjuu
The following user(s) said Thank You: LTK

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 23 Dec 2011 23:20 #46494

  • RyuJin
  • RyuJin's Avatar
  • Senior Knight
  • Priest
  • ID: 3037
i say, let things happen as they must... if one is meant to have children it will happen (whether they plan to or not). whether we have children or not we should still provide a positive rolemodel to all(adult and children alike).
I do not need a cloak of darkness, I am darkness and I am light. I am both because the universe is both.
sometimes you have to enter the darkness to save the light
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]
J.l.lawson, knight, b.div, o.c.p
Intake officer, Eastern Studies S.I.G advisor
Former masters: GM KanaSeikoHaruki, Br.John
Current Apprentices: Raikoutenshi, Zenchi, Baru

The following user(s) said Thank You: LTK

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 24 Dec 2011 03:24 #46495

I have 3 daughters and a gran daughter, they are my life!!!

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 24 Dec 2011 03:59 #46496

I have three fantastic children, I can't think of life without them now.

When my 1st one was on the way I was so very worried as I was not sure I was ready to be a dad, but when are we ever ready ???

Re: Should Jedi (when of age) have CHILDREN?? 24 Dec 2011 16:33 #46502

I don't really agree with Lucas that the point of life is having children- that's what a virus does, not more complex living things. We are more than our children.

However, I am a father myself, and can see the arguments for and against it in my own experiences. Parenting is a valuable teaching experience, and can be a great joy and fulfillment. However, your own body and mind does attempt to betray you and cause you to instinctively center on them. It has proven genetically valuable, but may not be the wisest course of action for a Jedi.

Through application of will, I have gotten to a place where I love my children, but feel no attachment to them, and do not revolve my life around them. Not many parents do all three of those things.

Saying Jedi should have children is something of a loaded statement to something that has advantages and disadvantages. I would say Jedi should be allowed to have children.
Latest Posts Comments Articles
    • Why should we have "fear of God"? (Last post by Gisteron)
    • Oh boy, how much to reply to... Alright, let's do this. First things first, as V-Tog pointed out, fear is, in this case, a tool. It is true that animals in terror tend to act irrationally when unguided but if your goal is to control a people, you will have an easier time at it if they believe your threats. So much easier, in fact, that said threats or at least fear mongering of one sort or another is a centerpiece of just about every remotely successful ideology, be it religious or political or otherwise. Now, there is still a difference between your standard boogie man, like the wicked machine-man Lord Vader, the greedy deceitful Jew or the treacherous atheist Soviet on the one hand, and the heavenly father of infinite mercy on the other hand, who you are supposed to fear no less than to love, and how the latter is positively sick, I think goes without saying. It must at this point be however added, that those who fear their gods usually think of themselves as some who one would think would have least reason to fear said gods. The religious seldom consider that their god is the wrong god and that they are doing wrong by their gods' respective standards; at best they might say that everybody does and that they will be forgiven. Even if their scripture, historical and contemporary scholars and religious authorities would disagree, the believer is almost always either blameless or - more often in the case of Abrahamic traditions - forgiven. The ones that ought to be positively afraid of their god are indeed the infidels and that this fear is still preached to a congregation of devout believers betrays in my opinion a certain satisfaction with the torment of the damned or, alternatively, the outdated concept that the majority of listeners in a church are the same infidels that would pass by the market preacher in bronze-age palestinian deserts - a mindset abrahamic traditions have been stuck in ever since. On to another, more specific point in the case of this particular desert's faiths, I would beg to differ with Ryu's theology. To put it the way Christopher Hitchens used to, at least the Old Testament God was done with you when you died. It is not until after the arrival of the Prince of Peace that talk begins of a fate far worse than death, extending for all time after it, as if a miserable life on earth, supposedly with all the rules and punishments as declared in the pentateuch still in place, if Jesus' alleged words are to be believed, wasn't quite enough of a punishment yet. That is not to say that the Old Testament God was kinder than we make him out to be. We typically don't quote the occasional sensible or kind saying, in part because all of them are preceded, succeeded or both by quite hideous ones. For instance, the ten plagues of Egypt in Exodus and the subsequent drowning of their entire army in the red sea had nothing to do with divine retribution. Rather, God just felt like screwing with the Egyptians because at the time Exodus was composed the ancient Hebrews happened in their culture to dislike Egyptians quite a bit and probably found it pleasant to write and read their sick fantasies and manifest their attitude in the person of God. Then there is Corwinani's post where he pretty much copied the text from the "Deities of the ancient Near East" portal box in Wikipedia and then told us to fear all of them and that somehow there are any dualities in either the list or the individual deities. Now, the second claim is false, as I'm sure you'd know if you had read any of the articles linked to in that box, and as for the recommendation to fear gods: No, thanks; better luck next time. A similarly cynical sentiment goes out to Seventh. Don't say you read the book from front to back when everything else you say betrays how you didn't. I could try and explain why I don't think that compassion, forgiveness and love are strongly represented overarching themes in the Bible and at best are undertones of a few select books of the New Testament and occasional passages in the Old, or how Revelations in particular, a book about how God will come back and destroy all of existence, is a rather poor example of the point you are trying to make, but instead I shall concede that I likewise have never read the Bible from cover to cover, and if I were to, I'd make sure to find out where the chapter long sections of, say, genealogies are, just to skip them because they are frankly boring. In any case, unlike Joseph And The Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat relating to Genesis, The Prince Of Egypt is not exactly an accurate telling of Exodus, I must disappointingly inform you. Neither the Hebrews nor Moses himself plead for their freedom, nor does the Bible have severe problems with slavery in that book. It regulates it, granted, but that's about it. Moses asked for the Pharaoh to set them free for as long as a mere three days to go out into the desert to worship their god after which they would come back. And the Pharaoh didn't stubbornly refuse the plea, God personally forced him to that decision, effectively negating most arguments about free will. He also forced him to pursue the Hebrews and even to go after them into the Red Sea. This wasn't retribution or a consequence of their actions. God just wanted to screw the Egyptians over and he did. Also, God is nothing like a father. And unless you are willing to murder your children for the mildest kinds of questioning, let alone disobedience, as God would in the Old Testament, or torment them for extended periods of time (and only a finite time for that stands to your avail), like God will according to the New Testament, you are nothing like either God. You are better than both.
    • Irritated by an individual, and changing my perspe... (Last post by Aharon)
    • One thing I noticed about what you said, Daniel, is that you have not attempted a conversation with your roommate, instead simply doubting such a conversation would work. I agree with Lestaut. You don't actually know that it won't work. Luke: "I don't believe it." Yoda: "That is why you fail." ;)
    • Windows 10 (Last post by Cyan Sarden)
    • Quote: I upgraded from 8.1 to 10 the other day. As soon as I log in the desktop just keeps reloading over and over again. I can't do anything unless I go into safe mode. I tried deleting the graphics drivers and redownloading them, tried disable anything that loaded on startup, and now I'm at a loss. Anyone got any ideas before I give up and go back to 8.1? If you somehow manage to do this: run msconfig, go to running services, hide Microsoft services, then mark all others and disable them. Once you apply, it'll tell you to reboot - do that and things should be back to normal. In my case, an older version of Google Chrome was the culprit - that one runs some kind of auto-update background task which wasn't compatible within windows 10. After the reboot I removed chrome - I find Edge better anyway
    • What is TTIP and why should we be angry about it? (Last post by OB1Shinobi)
    • i hate to be doom and gloom but things are not going to get better - theyve been getting progressively worse for decades and the trend is not slowing in pace or in scope there really is what amounts to an "evil empire" and it really is taking over and it really is very, very bad
    • Today I.... (Last post by RyuJin)
    • today i donated food to a homeless charity, even though i needed the money for supplies to fix my car
    • FAQ Update (Last post by Akkarin)
    • This slipped by but has now been updated properly: Rosalyn J is Secretary for the Clergy. Cabur Senaar is Secretary for the Synod. And here:
    • Thoughts of a simple man (Last post by MikeBudo)
    • Greetings Each FOCUS "High in the Himalayan mountains, lived a wise old man. Periodically, he ventured down into the local village to entertain the villagers with his special knowledge and talents. One of his skills was to "psychically" tell the villagers the contents in their pockets, boxes, or minds. A few young boys from the village decided to play a joke on the wise old man and discredit his special abilities. One boy came up with the idea to capture a bird and hide it in his hands. He knew of course, the wise old man would know the object in his hands was a bird. The boy devised a plan. Knowing the wise old man would correctly state the object in his hands was a bird, the boy would ask the old man if the bird was dead or alive. If the wise man said the bird was alive, the boy would crush the bird in his hands, so that when he opened his hands the bird would be dead; if the wise man said the bird was dead, the boy would open his hands and let the bird fly free. So not matter what the old man said, the boy would prove the old man a fraud. The following week, the wise old man came down from the mountain into the village. The boy quickly caught a bird and cupping it out of sight in his hands, walked up to the wise old man and asked, " Old man, old man, what is it that I have in my hands?" The wise old man said, "You have a bird." and he was right. The boy then asked, "Old man, old man tell me, is the bird alive or is it dead?" The wise old man looked at the boy and said, "The bird is as you choose it." And so it is with your life."
    • Logic Puzzles (Last post by Akkarin)
    • (Includes solution to first puzzle) Area maze: Answers are never fractions, the only equation you need is: Area of rectangle = width x height Spoiler: [image] Spoiler: [image] Spoiler: [image] Spoiler: [image] Spoiler: [image]
    • How to speak so that people want to listen (Last post by Akkarin)
    • Don't: Seven deadly sins of speaking Gossip, don't talk ill of people Judging, it's hard to listen if you know you're being judged Negativity Complaining, it's viral misery Excuses Penultimate, exaggeration and lying Dogmatism, the confusion of facts with opinions Do: HAIL Honesty, stand in your own truth Authenticity, be yourself Integrity, be your word Love, wish others well Consider: Register - deeper voices are listened to more and have more weight Timbre - people prefer rich/smooth/warm voices Prosody - the metalanguage used to impart meaning, don't be monotonous, don't end sentences like they're questions Pace - don't say things too quickly, take things slower rather than faster, use silence Pitch - Try adjusting your pitch for emphasis Volume - Adjusting your volume for emphasis, don't "sod-cast" loudly imposing your sound all the time
    • Rants far and wide (Last post by Edan)
    • I don't feel I can openly rant about what I want to rant about. So I'm going to rant that I can't rant about it. :angry:

There are 912 visitors, 12 guests and 32 members online (one in chat): Akkarin, Br. John, Grom Fett, steamboat28, Shadouness, Aharon, Jestor, Jedi_Roz, Karn, Adder, Gisteron, Proteus, V-Tog, Alexandre Orion, Leandros Von, Kamizu, mdk, Edan, SeventhSL, Rocda, Cyan Sarden, Fenton, Loudzoo, Krieger, Protonix, Tellahane, Corsair Gorscue, adventureexcitement242, WRRPhoto, Noct Pool, Spartanmeup, Whotalen, Vigebo, Mikhael, DanielJ, RikJWolfrik, Hiram Abiff.

Follow Us