TOPIC: Here is a good question.

Re: Here is a good question. 20 Dec 2011 01:03 #46274

  • Tenrec
  • Tenrec's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Member
  • ID: 8644
I think it's more about coming to understand the other ways people might try and get through their life. I believe that all humans have both positive and negative motivations and characteristics, as people trying to do well in the world, we are trying to motivate ourselves and others into a more positive life and through positive means. And to increase happiness, safety, health and love in the universe – I don't believe you can get those results through cruelty, anger, hate and so on.

To me, the 'dark side' is about how we are all tempted to wallow in our … selfish impulses; to use others for our own gain without thought to theirs, to blind ourselves to the potential harmful consequences of our actions, and even to decide to be intentionally cruel to achieve goals. So, for me, the whole dark side as just another part of Jediism doesn't make sense. The dark side are the aspects of all people that we struggle to manage, to clear ourselves from, to understand so we don't allow that darkness to control us.

But in order to be mindful of ourselves, we must also be willing to look at our flaws and weaknesses, to understand them and to let go of the shame and anger we might feel about our 'sins' so that we can actually deal with them.

Re: Here is a good question. 20 Dec 2011 01:40 #46276

the dark side is real, and the force is there also but we must resist the temptation of the dark side

Re: Here is a good question. 20 Dec 2011 02:37 #46282

I agree with most views here. I believe one has to understand the dualistic aspects that reside within. To label things as good and evil is a misconception on our part. We tend to label the things that we like and agree with as good and those that don't as evil. We have a choice to walk whatever path that we come across and no one has the right to judge you. Our ability to choose is what separates us from the rest of the animal kingdom. We are all creations of the one force but with different levels of understanding. Choice my brothers and sisters is what keeps us walking the path that resonates within. Until we can embrace our dualistic aspects and bring them into balance we will never be free of it. As a Jedi i choose to walk a certain path and i know that even though the sith walk another we both serve the same force.

Re: Here is a good question. 20 Dec 2011 07:07 #46295

I do not believe the dark side has anything to do with evil. Nor the light side with good.

The real difference between the two is are you going to draw strength from your emotions or from wisdom. Yes, one can draw great strength from ones emotions. But strong feelings will not bring peace. Any strong emotion rather it be love or hate pulls us further from the center. And the center is where harmony lies.
Intake Officer
Security Officer

"The true mind can weather all the lies and illusions without being lost. The true heart can tough the poison of hatred without being harmed. Since beginning-less time, darkness thrives in the void but always yields to purifying light."
The following user(s) said Thank You: PloKoon

Re: Here is a good question. 20 Dec 2011 07:17 #46298

  • Adder
  • Adder's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Knight
  • ID: 7778
Carl Jung might have had some insight into the Force on this topic;

I have learned that in addition to the spirit of this time there is still another spirit at work, namely that which rules the depths of everything contemporary. The spirit of this time would like to hear of use and value. I also thought this way, and my humanity still thinks this way. But that other spirit forces me nevertheless to speak, beyond justification, use, and meaning, filled with human pride and blinded by the presumptuous spirit of the times, I long sought to hold that other spirit away from me. But I did not consider that the spirit of the depths from time immemorial and for all the future possesses a greater power
than the spirit of this time, who changes with the generations.


My opinion on this is there is a real distinction how we percieve aspects of the Force, and its there where I think the terms living and unifying find meaning. That the living aspect is much more comfortable to work with, and that the unifying aspect much more foreign it is thus even dangerous to oneself. Perhaps that is the only distinction - how we percieve it. The point being though that accessing the unifying aspect seems to mean confronting the depths of the subconscious and venturing into the spiritual unknown.

Carl Jung continues a bit further on to say;

But the supreme meaning is the path, the way and the bridge to what is to come. That is the God yet to come. It is not the coming God himself, but his image which appears in the supreme meaning. God is an image, and those who worship him must worship him in the images of the supreme meaning. The supreme meaning is not meaning and not absurdity, it is image and force in one, magnificence and force together.

.. and;

The image of God has a shadow, and , and Like plants, so men also grow, some in the light, others in the shadows, and The image of God throws a shadow that isjust as great as itself, but he also says The shadow is nonsense, and It lacks force and has no continued existance through itself. But nonsense is the inseperable and undying brother of the supreme meaning.

So I do agree there is a dark side to the Force, but I see it as more a shadow of the Force itself. In this way I actually see the Force as 100% light. I think any use of emotions is a distraction from the Force, and is a misintepretation of what the dark side might be. I havent experienced any dark Force yet, but I have experienced parts of the Force so foreign they automatically generate an instinctual emotion reaction such as fear, thus appearing to be a dark force.

I find the Jedi philosophy really sits perfectly with the living aspect but I think the Sith code is a little more specific to dealing with the unifying aspect.... unfortunatly the nature of delving into the subconcious with any depth means confrontation with various potentials for madness so it makes sense that the Sith as portrayed by Hollywood turn out to be maniacs with diagnosable mental disorders!! That's a bit harsh though, and I'm finding a lot of the symbology of working with the spiritual dimension is what is popularily labelled as evil. I do though believe in evil, but only the type of behaviours displayed by animals like us humans, as I've yet to run into genuine supernatural evil.

As a result I just think any real world Sith would be almost a graduate program unto the Jedi path, taking the important foundations of the Jedi way and focusing on delving into the subconcious - to discover deeper truths about the Force. Perhaps Carl Jung's 'The Red Book' might be an apt inclusion into a Sith canon for the real world!!

Here is an excerpt from it; www.gnosis.org/library/The-Red-Book.pdf

Source: Jung, Carl Gustav (2009). Sonu Shamdasani. ed. The Red Book. Liber Novus

Re: Here is a good question. 20 Dec 2011 10:38 #46313

Wescli Wardest wrote:
I do not believe the dark side has anything to do with evil. Nor the light side with good.

The real difference between the two is are you going to draw strength from your emotions or from wisdom. Yes, one can draw great strength from ones emotions. But strong feelings will not bring peace. Any strong emotion rather it be love or hate pulls us further from the center. And the center is where harmony lies.

I believe the attachment to love pulls us from the center.

The Jedi Creed says this: "Where there is hatred, I shall bring love." Would we desire to bring love anywhere if it took us away from the center of harmony?

(BTW, great post; I like how it makes me think of the topic in more detail.)

Re: Here is a good question. 20 Dec 2011 11:08 #46314

That is a fine line you're treading.

Why would it be acceptable to love and not to hate? If I am allowed one extreme, why not the other. Because of how it is viewed?

I see bringing love as an action and not an emotion, like compassion. It is in the act of compassion that we aid. But, if I am to strike down an enemy in defense of my life would it be hate, an act of hate or just someone viewing as a hateful act. Because not all will see it as an act of defense.

And that is why I do not prescribe to this line of thought. Does an apple tree love you because it provides you fruit to eat? Even though the seed is poisonous?

Perhaps in the future I will be more comfortable exploring these paths, but for now I feel I should just try and stay in the center. And yes, it is a comfort level. I think it would be unwise for me to try and explore all possibilities until I have better mastered where I am at.

I am reminded that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Many times throughout history people have traveled where angles fear to tread. And it usually ends with disastrous results.
Intake Officer
Security Officer

"The true mind can weather all the lies and illusions without being lost. The true heart can tough the poison of hatred without being harmed. Since beginning-less time, darkness thrives in the void but always yields to purifying light."

Re: Here is a good question. 20 Dec 2011 11:19 #46316

You said: "Why would it be acceptable to love and not to hate? If I am allowed one extreme, why not the other. Because of how it is viewed?"

Not by how it is viewed, but by consequences we have seen from it. I think it would be difficult to present a lot of evidence suggesting that cultivating hate had a more beneficial end than bringing or cultivating love and compassion.

As a learning Jedi, I think it's not acceptable to hate because it leads to the Dark Side. Love and compassion, not attached and living in the moment doesn't lead to the dark side. The fear of losing love or in other words, the fear of not having it anymore is the path to hell as you put it.

Anyway, just my thoughts. I'm certainly not trying to convince you my way is right. Just wanted to throw out another view point.

(Again, good post to think on.)

Re: Here is a good question. 20 Dec 2011 11:43 #46319

  • Tenrec
  • Tenrec's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Member
  • ID: 8644
Why would it be acceptable to love and not to hate? If I am allowed one extreme, why not the other. Because of how it is viewed?

Well, basically yes - it's preferable to love, not hate and it's okay to value one emotion over the other.

For one thing, in general love brings about good and positive things in the world and others. Hate never has, that I know of, resulted in a positive, good feeling in others. So, yes, I value love over hate (compassion over anger, forgivness over vengance etc).

Re: Here is a good question. 20 Dec 2011 14:19 #46324

The problem with hate, like love, is that is can be a two edged sword when used improperly. Someone who is inexperienced with such delicate matters can easily cause themselves and those around them much pain and suffering with any strong emotion. While they do have some benefits (love can help bring peace, hate can bring focus for instance), it is an area to tread lightly.

As to the parable of the apple tree, it simply is. There is no love or hate, good or evil in it. It just is, much the same way as I feel the Force to be. There is no good or evil, light or dark within the Force, it simply is. It is the individual with good or evil intent in their hearts that makes the difference.

There is nothing wrong with placing greater value on the usefulness of hate than of love, it is your perogative. The Force will not be less or more either way. You may destroy yourself and those around you if you are not careful, but it is still your choice, and only your choice.

We may not agree with everyone's opinions here, but we still care about them as individuals and respect their right to their own opinions. In this way, we love everyone, even those who we may otherwise not be able to tolerate. As stated before, this is my view, and you are entitled to yours, which I respect.
Latest Posts Comments Articles
    • God vs Ego (Last post by Leandros Von)
    • I think we are on the same page Raikoutenshi, though I would say the key lies in the separation, you can separate yourself from the angel and the devil, you just can't "understand" how it is done. What I wonder is if in describing the serpent Campbell was talking about the ego, it isn't good or bad it was just necessary for a while. We as humans like the snake have the ability to throw off "life" (the ego) and still survive through true consciousness. The trying to understand thing is more that true consciousness transcends all human thought, it cannot be explained or taught, you can only be given pointers of how to achieve a true state of being by seeking it out within you. letting go of the ego brain is how we come into true being.
    • Shadow Being (Last post by Brenna)
    • Quote: I think the first thing you should determine is if the phenomenon is inside her head or outside it. If it's outside then other people will observe it too. That's unfortunately not necessarily true. Although if would be helpful to see if anyone else can see or sense it.
    • From a corner of the library ... (Last post by Alexandre Orion)
    • This little piggy went to market ... fora.tv/2009/07/20/Michael_Sandel_on_Markets_and_Morals ... and 'wow', did he ever ! :huh: (can't figure out how to embed the vidéo, so just follow the link) :angry:
    • Peaceful means and the lightsabre (Last post by suliskveteba)
    • Quote: Well, not everyone in the galaxy wants peace in the way Jedi do. As large as the galaxy is, many many people see that violence IS the answer and the Jedi realize this. They use the lightsaber because they know not everyone will be unarmed and there to only talk. This is just my opinion of course. Also, it is a symbol to the Jedi and all who see.it. Franciscan, Dominican, Carmelite Friars Eastern Orthodox Priests Buddhist Monks etc all these groups desire peace, and deal with people who desire violence and they know this, not only do they not carry weapons, but they succeed in bringing peace to others. the symbolisim comment was interesting, but again, we the the TOTJO logo, TOJF logo FA, JS and literally many more which say "Jedi" so the lightsabre isn't really needed in that respect.
    • Is the Bible the Literal Word of God? (Last post by suliskveteba)
    • again, as I have stated in my own biblical thread, the Bible is a dusty old abstract Tome, potentially beautiful and lifechanging, but hardly literally true, in the west with the KJV and NIV atrocities to the translations ( here's to Augustine *raises glass*, oh and Calvin ( who gave his best friend an excruciating death of living incineration)) we can't really say much on the Bible, St Ignatius of Antioch has been metaphorically crucified ( get it?) by protestants for saying the NT is better than OT because the NT has the gospel, life of Christ and his teachings, the core of Christianity.
    • the bible..............*sighs* (Last post by suliskveteba)
    • trying to seperate myself from the previous frustration of impatience that I had when I posted the original post here, the bible is mainly a story book (Old testament), a book with great poetry and symbolism, with beautiful stories and lessons to be learnt, when it isn't a story, it is an abstract form of philosophy or meaning that is supposed to teach you a lesson every time you read it. I am not arguing against the bible, but like philosophy, I was arguing against the reactions of: - Claiming the Bible is pure divine text ( sometimes the claim of "only divine text") - Taking every single word of the Bible as truth or literal meaning both reactions don't hold true to the original meaning or motivation of the Bible.
    • Who would you like to meet? (Last post by Lorian)
    • Quote: Why such angst towards Lucifer? Maybe Lucifer gave him a bad birthday present sometime? ;) On a more serious note, I would personally like to meet the Dalai Lama as he is a man of great wisdom, is very well versed and is knowledgeable. I suppose meeting him could be considered akin to meeting the Pope, as I have heard from friends and other ears that meeting either religious man is both humbling and wonderful. The Dalai Lama also serves as an inspiration to many, as he continues to advocate for a free Tibet despite having the odds stacked against him, so to learn of how he holds such strong resolve in light of such adversity not only intrigues me but also makes me respect the man a great deal more. I'm not overly fond of actors, yet meeting Harrison Ford would be very cool indeed if I was given the chance :D
    • the dark side (Last post by Bao Shenlo)
    • Quote: [quote="Jestor" post=105806 Do you enjoy "light comedy" too? Ya know, slapstick, silly stuff? Think that makes you "light"? oh boy, do I! if people think slapstick is lame and stupid I would present forth mr bean ( as soon as youtube stops being annoying)[/quote] "Forth", as in Black Adder goes Forth?
    • Seems Quiet Around Here? (Last post by Azrael)
    • Quote: Blue... Summer time means outdoor stuff.... Can't be a Jedi staring at a computer screen!! :P Unless you're a Librarian. :P
    • Loss (Last post by Metsu Desal)
    • Didn't expect to get any replies for this thread haha! You're all welcome because you see TOTJO is more than just another Jedi Community, here friendships are built, connections are forged and a family is born, we don't judge or look down upon anyone and that is what makes TOTJO not just good, but exceptional I sincerely look forward to our future here at TOTJO together! :)
    • Nature of "the Force" (Light/Dark dicoto... (Last post by Adder)
    • Quote: A comparison i typically use in the Star Wars online roleplaying community i am a part of is to take the colour purple. It is after all a single colour but we of course know that is is made of two different colours, blue and red. It is through either calm, peaceful communion or the use of raw emotion and passion that either one of these sides or colours can then be distinguished and as such felt and communed with. Sometimes I feel like the dichotomy of light and dark is akin to a black and white TV versus a color TV, and it leaves me wondering 'what about the colors!!!'. Purple is almost like an energetic grey in that way. Of course the dichotomy is not of these things, but what they represent. Still, I was looking at the color spectrum and cannot help but think red at one end and purple at the other are very different from light versus dark (with are very much poles apart).... since purple is a combination of the antipole red, plus blue! So I like to see red as standing for passion/sacrifice and at the other end the purple color really is a clash between that red and blue, ie conflict. It could make more sense for purple to represent conflict as it does actual show a higher energy state. So then going all Star Wars (sorry Zenchi) red blades could represent a call for victims to sacrifice on the Sith blade, while blue a call to conflict so it can be settled best by the Jedi way together with green as protective and harmonious midpoint. In which case a color Force dichotomy could be passion/red/giving of oneself to a cause, versus conflict/purple/exhausting resources through competition for a cause. It also aligns well with blood, red is fresh and oxygenated ready for use, while purple is rare and causes tension around it. One of the things I like about dichotomies is that by having two points they automatically create a midpoint. So in this regard I feel like the color version of grey might not be purple like I first thought, but instead green!
    • Slap off your cheeky smile and have a good rant ..... (Last post by Alexandre Orion)
    • LOL ... :cheer: Last week it was Jestor covering the soap box with controvery. Now look ... All things, even equality, considered, you're right, Wescli. And that was sort of what I had "hoped" to get to by this. It isn't clear as to whether or not we're not really all equals, for the story of the carreer in baseball aspirations doesn't imply that shortstop or first baseman could programme a robot to tear up a hill ... We are not all equal in all domains ; that is an evidence. It is unsure whether we have equal potential even in all domains. I'm personally not much of a determinist, but do feel that we have dispositions which render us better at some things than at others. Still ... And S - you are on to something there about the ones who are disappointed when things turn out better. Here in France, we are always listening to the whinings of those who are all salty about things not living down to their expectations. :dry: And if one thinks well about it, the Schopenhauerian toad would definitely make ones day better. Toad skin secretes a sort of tryptamine, bufotenin, which acts as a sort of neurotransmitter that is the same or similar as found in some mushrooms and plants. So, by swallowing a toad for breakfast - one would be flying high nicely for a good part of the day. :woohoo: It is this which is reputed to have given us all the faerie tales about princesses kissing toads and they miraculously turn into princely lovers ... :huh:

We have 309 visitors, 3 guests and 7 members online (one is in chat): Br. John, Jestor, Adhara, Desolous, Zenchi, Alexandre Orion, Llama Su, Bao Shenlo, JoeyTap, elizabeth.

Follow Us