TOPIC: Temple Rider??

Moderators: Phortis Nespin, Wescli Wardest
  • Page:
  • 1

Temple Rider?? 30 Jun 2012 17:19 #65478

As you can see my avitar is my motorcycle vest with the TOTJO symbol. B) Love it!!!!!
I asked in my journal if it was ok to add a tag that identified me as "Temple Rider" or Jedi Rider". Master Jestor suggested "Lady Jedi" and suggested I ask other members for their opinion.
So I am asking what do you think????

Re: Temple Rider?? 30 Jun 2012 17:50 #65479

  • Br. John
  • Br. John's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Councillor
  • Bishop
  • ID: 523
I like all of them and Jedi Rider the best.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Kimla Daalm

Re: Temple Rider?? 01 Jul 2012 05:48 #65518

In one of the first Star Wars books I read (Dark Loards of the Sith series) There was a Jedi named Nomi Sun Rider I think???

Kimla Hog Rider? If you have a Harley that is.:lol:
"I have no religion, I am a Jedi, My philosophy is the balance of all things in life, and to treat everyone with kindness and compassion."

The following user(s) said Thank You: Kimla Daalm

Re: Temple Rider?? 02 Jul 2012 01:05 #65633

Thank you for your input. I do actually ride a Harley Phortis, and my personalised plate is 3 JEDI.
3 for past, present and future, JEDI
3 beacuse it is supposed to be lucky for saggitsarius,
3 beacause it is supposed to be lucky for my numerology

and JEDI3 looks like JED 13, not good...
so any mor ideas, before I order ??????

Re: Temple Rider?? 06 Jul 2012 05:04 #66122

I like Jedi Rider myself, haha.

But the other suggestions are pretty good, too. I don't think you can go wrong with any of them.

Hint hint....you need to post a picture of you on that Harley!

I only have an electric bicycle; but I get about 100mpg on that hog! Haha.

MTFBWY,
LTK
The following user(s) said Thank You: Kimla Daalm
  • Page:
  • 1
Latest Posts Comments Articles
    • Levels of Hppiness... (Last post by Wescli Wardest)
    • “WHAT IS MAN?” The Four Levels of Happiness An Essay by Graham Moorhouse The consideration of the above question has been enormously complicated by modern man’s abandonment of the very notion of objective moral truth! One may hear for example people say such gobbledegook as: “Whether an unborn child is a person or not is a matter of opinion.” As a culture we have learned to talk out of both sides of our mouths at once, because this is certainly not the way we actually live our lives. No one for example drives with eyes shut on the premise that whether it is safer to drive with one’s eye shut is a matter of personal opinion. When our own health and well-being are at issue we start to believe very firmly indeed in objective truth. Our doubts about objective truth are restricted to moral truths and only arise when it is opportune to doubt, so as to remove obstacles from our chosen path. The modern philosophical claim that objective truth is merely one individual’s perception and therefore: “How dare you impose your perceptions on me,” is a collective hypocrisy which we slip in to and out of at will, as and when it serves our present purpose. The German philosopher Alice von Hilderbrand, famously responded to a student who told to her not to impose her opinions upon her: “My dear, if it is true, it is not my truth but our truth. We can only lay claim to personal ownership of our errors.” If we can agree that there is such a thing as objective truth, the next issue we must explore is: Can one actually arrive at an objective methodology for defining things? The best place to start such an intellectual journey is with a noble pagan who lived 400 years before Jesus Christ, the Greek philosopher, Aristotle. Aristotle argued that a thing should be defined by its end, purpose, raison d’être. Thus an acorn is not merely a small greeny brown thing, but is something with the power and purpose of oak tree, or “oak-treeness”. The purpose and end of man, Aristotle argued, was happiness - for happiness is self-evidently what all men seek and strive for, it is what he directs all his powers towards. So this universal quest for happiness defines humanness. “Happiness” Aristotle pointed out is the only thing willed by man for its own sake. Everything else is willed for the sake of happiness. But this is where the debate really becomes interesting, for there are according to the noble pagans four levels of happiness. The truth behind this insight is now confirmed by theology, philosophy, psychology, sociology and indeed many modern disciplines. These disciplines may use different terminology, but they are all basically talking about the same thing that Aristotle was talking about 2400 years ago. These four levels are summarised as follows Happiness Level 1 Happiness level 1 is simply sensual gratification: enjoying a good meal, sexual gratification, owning the latest BMW or gadget, watching a good football match, etc. The pleasures of happiness level one are intense but short lived. There is nothing wrong with happiness level 1 unless one puts the little word ONLY in front of it. When you do this, you will sooner or later hit a crisis where life seems to be pretty shallow and empty. Happiness Level 2 Happiness level 2 is ego gratification: being the best, the fastest, smartest, funniest, most liked and esteemed, admired, powerful etc. Again there is absolutely nothing wrong with happiness level 2, it’s what drives progress, makes us build the Sydney Opera House, etc., and it’s what makes the fundamentals of happiness level 1 healthy - we now eat and relax to perform better. There is nothing wrong with happiness level 2, unless one again puts that little word ONLY in front of it. When we do this, others become competitors, a challenge, problems. Men locked into happiness level 2 may have several failed marriages. Friends and wives are for such people there to stroke their ego and tell them how wonderful they are. When they cease to do this, they are rejected for a new relationship. The worlds of politics and entertainment are filled with HL2 types. Happiness level 3 Happiness level 3 is best summed up by the word “love”. It is reached when we genuinely move from the self to the other. That is, when we start to live to serve another, or others, or a cause that will be of benefit to others. HL3 involves commitment, giving, loyalty, care, concern, forgiveness, acceptance, compassion and above all self-sacrifice. HL3 again makes HL2 healthy: we start to achieve, to serve. I want to be a good lawyer so that I may give my children a good education and represent the poor well, for example. Other people are now no longer mere competitors or ego-strokers. Others become partners with whom I can work in a much more noble enterprise than my own ego-gratification. But HL3 also has its crisis when we again put ONLY in front of it. Why? Because human beings do not just want love, we want ultimate unconditional love. We do not just want truth, we want ultimate unconditional truth. We do not just want beauty, we want ultimate unconditional absolute beauty. We do not merely want being, we want absolute being. But I cannot be an ultimate unconditional infinite anything for you, nor you for me. Why not? Because I’m a creature, finite, limited. The more deeply we know one another, the more apparent that becomes and the more disillusioned we become. The crisis in the HL3 person leads to cynicism, the feeling that whatever I commit myself to inevitably disappoints me in the end. The philosopher John Paul Sartre summed it up when he wrote: “I seek perfection, but perfection does not exist, therefore life is absurd.” Happiness level 4 The happiness level 4 person simply acknowledges his human desire for the ultimate and consciously seeks a relationship with God, the ultimate truth, love, goodness, beauty and being. HL4 involves surrender. The kernel of HL4 is summed up in the prayer: “Thy will be done.” The true HL4 person enjoys a great inner peace. HL4 makes HL3 healthy, for you no longer need to be perfect for me and I no longer seek the ultimate in you. I’m easy and comfortable with the fact that we are deeply flawed and very finite. This liberates me to love unconditionally. One of the greatest examples of an HL3/4 personality in our own times would be Mother Teresa. Where we, or more importantly, our culture, sits on the “staircase” of happiness affects every issue of life. It affects our view of success, quality of life, suffering, ethics, freedom, human rights, the common good, personhood and love. “Personhood” is the real biggie. If the culture is built on happiness level 1 attitudes, then it is focused on things - eating things, consuming things, owning things. In such a culture we will tend to look upon other people as just things. And if you are a thing, I’m a thing. This is hardly likely to do much for our self-esteem and abortion and euthanasia are unlikely to cause us too much loss of sleep. If we are in an happiness level 2 culture, i.e. ego gratification, where outstripping, performing, achieving, competitive advantage, is the name of the game, once I become weak and dependant then euthanasia makes perfect sense. “Persons” in such a culture are either winners or losers, and once nature has determined from here on you are going to be a loser in competitive terms, then self murder makes perfect sense. And if a new baby is getting in the way of you winning a Wimbledon final, why not murder it by abortion. Winning is what life is all about. Winning is what makes you happy and all human beings seek happiness don’t they? For the happiness level 3/4 person and culture all this is just too shallow to contemplate. To the happiness level 4 person human beings are mystery, with the potential for infinite love, beauty, justice, goodness and being. Before such a mystery the only appropriate response is to genuflect. And this is as true for the one cell zygote in a woman’s fallopian tubes as it is for you and me - for all three of us are defined by the same potential thirst and capacity for the infinite, the same potential perfection of our powers. Indeed, from the perspective of level 3 & 4, the six months we spend bed-ridden, incontinent and slowly losing our faculties may be the most fruitful six months of our entire lives. They may be the time that we spend doing the most forgiving, the most intense loving, the most profound passing on of wisdom to the younger generation, the most invoking in others of that care, love, compassion and self-sacrifice that redeems humanity, and ennobles us by lifting us above mere brutes. Euthanasia, from this perspective would mean rubbing out the most fruitful months and years of people’s lives. [attachment]
    • Addiction to the perception of power (Last post by Rickie The Grey)
    • Quote: Thank you for responding. This is very tough for me to get through. I feel a lot of guilt over my thoughts and intentions over the past several years. I have never actually harmed anyone though there were times when I would get very angry. I would cast hexes and curses on others. I never found out if I succeeded although there were a couple of occasions where I seem to have. It does not matter if one were to say it was coincidence or if I truly was able to bend the forces of change to my will. The fact of the matter is that I want nothing more to do with that path. I am spiritually sick and I know that deep down I was never truly "evil" so to speak. I can recall that I felt imprisoned and beyond redemption. I was easily manipulated. For now I feel that my destructive nature should be set aside. If there is a way to do good somehow with it, to heal others, or to create, then I know that during this process I will retain some of that. But if that is not a true part of myself then it will depart along with the rest of this negativity. There have been a lot of tears so far. A lot of people go through their entire lives not realizing that there are forces at work, energies that by their nature will corrupt you if you invite them in, and it truly is an internal struggle. I would not wish this upon anyone. I feel that this negative energy is the essence of what some would consider demonic although I do not believe in biblical demons as such. I do however believe in duality and in energies. The Universe does not inherently have a dark or light side. It simply exists. But there are some such as we who have discovered a way to attune ourselves to the Universe. When you are aware of these energies you can choose to create or destroy. Those who chose to destroy invited negativity into our world. I believe that it has been here since then. We create "evil" and only we can banish it. The Universe will not force us. We must open ourselves to the will of the Universe, to the will of the Force, and only then can we heal ourselves. Try doing some random acts of kindness. Small simple things that are helpfull to others, makes someone smile or feel better. Situations will present themselves, you will act kindly and move on. You'll feel better for it.
    • Political persecution (Last post by ren)
    • Quote: I'm not worried about being extradited. You should be. When they want something (or someone), they get it. No asylum status is going to protect you if you're in a country that does't have the guts to say "screw you".
    • Actual Churches? (Last post by Whyte Horse)
    • Dude, we should have black lights and those black light posters in one of the rooms. [video]
    • The Sith Academy! (Last post by Alaaric Jensen)
    • Yes RyuJin well said. I do believe that if they had any real power they would not be so open about themselves in the way that they are. They seem to allow their darkest secrets to unfold like a book. When they speak they do not sound confident. By all appearances they seem to be living out a fantasy but I never assume when I do not know. That is the best policy in my opinion. I am focusing my use of energy working and magic to heal. I want to create and not destroy. I believe that it is a waste of effort to use your abilities, or talents, whatever they may be, to hurt others. When I look at the philosophy of the Sith Academy, and then look at what my philosophy was before, I see that they are similar in essence, but they are both truly pointless. What is the purpose of domination? Conquest of that which already exists, to convert all of reality into your own image, it is a waste of time. What happens when, theoretically, all reality is under your control? Everything would conform with everything else. Everything would be the same but you are at a dead end. Where do you go from there? If you have nothing left to conquer or destroy then your motives have been exhausted. You no longer have a purpose. Creation however, is limitless, and there is no end to creating. All things that are created in this dimension must decay however, but more is created in place of what has departed, and I believe that most life reincarnates. Those who live only for domination or destruction lead an empty life. By remembering that emptiness I am inspired to keep struggling against my own temptations to fall back into that old life of self destruction.
    • Charged With Felony For Lesbian Relationship (Last post by ren)
    • May have nothing to do with homosexuality. 18 year old "going out" with a 15 year old is paedophilia: An adult engaging in sexual acts with a child (someone under 16). Some parents are going to be cool with it, gay or hetero, some aren't. Either way, if the law says it isn't cool, don't complain when you get caught. Not sure why they call it "battery" though ?
    • Seems Quiet Around Here? (Last post by meganrtaylor)
    • Rickie the Grey Quote: If I over think intuition it get's jumbled. I completely agree. Once you start to think about your intuition, you immediately over think your intuition. Always go with your gut. Once I learned to trust my intuition, instinct, gut, whatever you want to call it, I was able to become a much better medic. The ability to overcome the egos need to control instinct is a very helpful tool in your Jedi toolbox.
    • Opinion on an Orwell quote (Last post by Whyte Horse)
    • Part of the double-speak paradigm is hiding the underlying ideology and making slogans that nobody can disagree with because it doesn't mean anything. It's like "support our troops"... yeah everyone supports our troops... try saying "support our war" and see what happens.
    • Who would you like to meet? (Last post by Wendaline)
    • I would like to meet my distant relative who fought in the Civil War and was captured by the South...once released they shipped him off to serve at Fort Caspar where he died of malnutrition. How sucky would that be? Living...I would like to meet Chris Angel and ask him how he looks so young!!! I mean, whatever he does it works well and I wanna know. :P
    • Peaceful means and the lightsabre (Last post by 666)
    • We all know, violence it's at last end we need to know also violence exist hope never happen, but we all can be pushed to use violence there is always a way to push other to use. so, now the real question, when happen, and it's time for us to defend ourself, or someone else what we use by self defense law, never a weapon bigger in power than your opponent. to me, use what I need to end up safe in fast and secure way, if that can be accomplish taking in mind my local laws BETTER lightsabers don't exist, so are not an option a stick bo shinai boken sword broom knife gun chain o whatever we use is up to the moment, there is no way to know (can be in the bathroom, when you take a shower, and your best weapon can be your shampoo and a towel) you can carry a baton (if is legal) or a stunt baton, or whatever. lightsabers don't exist, can look like, but doesn't work. your surrounding can provide weapons.... you can be the weapon...
    • God vs Ego (Last post by Leandros Von)
    • Quote: One has to remember, there is no such thing as good or evil, its all about power. I think you may have misunderstood the intention of my ramblings MurMur, this was never about God as a deity it was my way of breaking down the differences between the ego brain and true consciousness. I chose to use the mythology as a method of explaining the internal conflict and the transcendence of it. Quote: I think the word "god" leaves a bitter taste in most people's mouths, but in this case, "god" is a word meaning your own, personal "higher self", not a religious god. Thank you Master, I suppose the use of the term "GOD" is very much misrepresented at times, as you have stated what I meant by god is the part of you that is "GOD" (the force), whether the god is good or evil is irrelevant, it still created the ego self and as such is the true spirit and driving force behind the illusion of what we are. Though I also suppose that in using the word god I was talking about the mythical concept of a god that is there for our fragile ego to grasp upon until true enlightenment comes through mythological translation of the holy scriptures.
    • Is the Bible the Literal Word of God? (Last post by Azrael)
    • Even though in the early years of my life i was raised a Christian, i could never take the Bible seriously. In my mind there were some good lessons yes but a lot of what i heard stood out as being no different from the fairy tales my mum and dad told me when i was small. Noahs ark for example or Moses parting the Red Sea.. One must bare in mind that while the Bible is in places trying to give a moral lesson (perhaps not in the most straightforward way) large tracts of it, the Old Testament in particular was written at a time when people still believed the Sun was a man in a chariot flying across the sky or thunder was an expression of the gods anger. Much of it was mans early attempts to explain and educate people on how the world and nature worked and even came into being when infact they had no proof. Indeed, even today, we still largely lack a lot of proof for much of this. While there are SOME lessons to be learned, much of it is pure myth. I cannot treat the story of Genesis any more seriously than the story of the Norse creation myth, how the first gods came out of a giants armpit.

We have 184 visitors, 4 guests and 13 members online (one is in chat): Akkarin, soya, Jestor, ren, Wescli Wardest, Adhara, Desolous, Lorian, Hadi Apollos, rugadd, MCSH, Vusuki, Gnost Qui-Li, Kamizu, Dbrewer1995, StephenZuckerman, LuCrae Jiddu.

Learning

Community

Help

About Us

Follow Us